DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« Why Can’t We Visualize More Than Three Dimensions?
Financial “reporting” is entertainment »

Repressing Randi – Really?

by Mark Trodden

Somebody please, please, tell me this isn’t so.

If it’s really the truth, please take whatever punitive action you can.

Share

March 30th, 2009 8:23 PM
in Science and Society | 6 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

6 Responses to “Repressing Randi – Really?”

  1. 1.   Sean Says:
    March 30th, 2009 at 8:55 pm

    I strongly suspect it’s some sort of automated response, or at worst an overenthusiastic underling. I doubt it’s some sort of anti-skeptic prejudice. Will willingly boost my cynicism quotient if wrong.

  2. 2.   Blake Stacey Says:
    March 30th, 2009 at 9:15 pm

    Word on the street is that some complaints were filed about the JREF’s videos using copyrighted material. The DMCA provisions are such that the site hosting the challenged documents has to take them down first and ask questions later, so even if the complaints are entirely bogus, the videos go offline, at least temporarily.

  3. 3.   john evo Says:
    March 30th, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    Somebody please, please, tell me this isn’t so.

    Sorry, can’t do that.

    f it’s really the truth, please take whatever punitive action you can.

    There really is only one way to go with this since YouTube has resolutely failed to respond to complaints about this and other free-speech related infringements. It is going to be uncomfortable at first, but free-thinkers have to leave the YouTube forum and bring the strength of numbers into a new, less restrictive one. I’m thinking this may be the place to go

  4. 4.   Brian Says:
    March 31st, 2009 at 1:14 am

    It’s a bit misleading to state that “YouTube has resolutely failed to respond to complaints”. YouTube, or rather Google, simply doesn’t respond much to complaints about anything. They’re notoriously bad at anything that can’t be automated, and dealing with user complaints definitely falls into that category.

    Now, that may be a good enough reason for the JREF to decide to stop using YouTube. But let’s not be paranoid about it.

  5. 5.   Observer Says:
    March 31st, 2009 at 3:55 am

    “YouTube has resolutely failed to respond to complaints about this and other free-speech related infringements”

    Your complaints, or everyones? I’d say their response to John McCain is pretty detailed, and explains why they’re doing things in a certain way, and who’s forcing them to do that:

    http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/10/youtube-responds-mccain-campaigns-letter

    In general, it seems that organizations like the EFF and others have no trouble talking to YouTube or Google, and I suspect they listen to JREF as well (Randi did a talk in 2007, which is still available on YouTube, so I’m sure they know who he is). Maybe it’s just people ranting in comment boxes that are being ignored?

  6. 6.   the world of stupid, vol 1 « The Answer’s 42 Says:
    April 1st, 2009 at 9:01 am

    [...] 1, 2009 I’m back again… I just read something on Cosmic Variance about how Youtube seems to have suspended the videos of the James Randi Educational Foundation. Needless to say it distracted me from a job form… oh dear. Anyway, here’s the [...]





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Boycott Elsevier
      • Mind = Blown
      • Unsolicited Advice XIII: How to Craft a Well-Argued Proposal
      • Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Good News/Bad News: Nobel Edition
      • Do I Not Live?
      • Noisy Systems and Wandering Canines
      • Happy Birthday, Stephen Hawking
      • Predictions for 2012
      • A Year Well Blogged
      • Happy Holidays!
      • Last-Minute Shopping List
      • The Girl With Various Interesting Qualities
    • Recent Comments

      • jammer on Mind = Blown
      • Kaleberg on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • David Brown on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Andrew on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • steven johnson on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Albert Z on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Phillip Helbig on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • JoeTurpin on Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Valdis Kletnieks on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Bob Kirshner on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us