<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Can&#8217;t We Visualize More Than Three Dimensions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:07:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nema Mansuri</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-93737</link>
		<dc:creator>Nema Mansuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/#comment-93737</guid>
		<description>I disagree with the one post above! Saying that &quot;time is the fourth dimension&quot; is an objection to searching for a fourth dimension. Time is a known dimensions, like the first 3 dimensions of space, time is NOT an extra dimension. A fourth spatial dimension or a second temporal dimension would be the &quot;extra dimensions&quot;, things beyond what has been observed in universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the one post above! Saying that &#8220;time is the fourth dimension&#8221; is an objection to searching for a fourth dimension. Time is a known dimensions, like the first 3 dimensions of space, time is NOT an extra dimension. A fourth spatial dimension or a second temporal dimension would be the &#8220;extra dimensions&#8221;, things beyond what has been observed in universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nema Mansuri</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-93733</link>
		<dc:creator>Nema Mansuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/#comment-93733</guid>
		<description>The nature of extra dimensions may be different from our standard three dimensions. This difference can explain how extra dimensions may not affect people&#039;s experience. There are two ways of having the extra dimensions different from the 3D. First, one or more of the particles you see in the known universe may not be able to propagate into higher dimensions. This would explain why we&#039;re not able to move in the fourth dimension. Secondly, the extra dimensions may be compact. If they are SO tiny (hopefully not) would explain why us (macroscopic being) do not notice them. Nema</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nature of extra dimensions may be different from our standard three dimensions. This difference can explain how extra dimensions may not affect people&#8217;s experience. There are two ways of having the extra dimensions different from the 3D. First, one or more of the particles you see in the known universe may not be able to propagate into higher dimensions. This would explain why we&#8217;re not able to move in the fourth dimension. Secondly, the extra dimensions may be compact. If they are SO tiny (hopefully not) would explain why us (macroscopic being) do not notice them. Nema</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geraint</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-81265</link>
		<dc:creator>geraint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 17:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/#comment-81265</guid>
		<description>hey im into this stuff: 2dimensions could be our eyes as we have 2 eyes, the third could be our imagination-brain as the brain does prossess what we se and therefore we can get a perception. and without our eyes we wouldnt see any dimention to imagin or process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey im into this stuff: 2dimensions could be our eyes as we have 2 eyes, the third could be our imagination-brain as the brain does prossess what we se and therefore we can get a perception. and without our eyes we wouldnt see any dimention to imagin or process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Successful Researcher</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-73727</link>
		<dc:creator>Successful Researcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/#comment-73727</guid>
		<description>Great post and great discussion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and great discussion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimensões e apreensão de conceitos desconhecidos &#171; Pensamentos randômicos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-71423</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimensões e apreensão de conceitos desconhecidos &#171; Pensamentos randômicos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/#comment-71423</guid>
		<description>[...] que mostra como construir um hipercubo e também há uns desenhos para facilitar a compreensão. Why can&#8217;t we visualize more than three dimensions Flatland - verbete da Wikipedia (em [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] que mostra como construir um hipercubo e também há uns desenhos para facilitar a compreensão. Why can&#8217;t we visualize more than three dimensions Flatland &#8211; verbete da Wikipedia (em [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebdePaylas.Net - Science News&#38;Articles!!!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-70996</link>
		<dc:creator>WebdePaylas.Net - Science News&#38;Articles!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/#comment-70996</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why Can’t We Visualize More Than Three Dimensions?&lt;/strong&gt;

Physicists and mathematicians who think about higher-dimensional spaces are, if they allow their interest to somehow become public knowledge, inevitably asked: “How can you visualize more than three dimensions of space?” There are at least three co...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why Can’t We Visualize More Than Three Dimensions?</strong></p>
<p>Physicists and mathematicians who think about higher-dimensional spaces are, if they allow their interest to somehow become public knowledge, inevitably asked: “How can you visualize more than three dimensions of space?” There are at least three co&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-70863</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/#comment-70863</guid>
		<description>I used to advocate using time and color (and sometimes a second time dimension) to aid visualizing additional dimensions, but found that this approach has severe limitations when I needed to compute Voronoi cells of lattices in 6 dimensions (because the dimensions use different units I can&#039;t compare distances meaningfully... also rigid body transformations are difficult (try rotating from the time dimension towards the color dimension while preserving distances)).  Eventually I got a bit of a &quot;knack&quot; for visualizing lattices in 6 dimensions.  Hard to describe, though;  it &quot;looked&quot; 3D, but weirder.  It hinges on the lattice being highly symmetrical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to advocate using time and color (and sometimes a second time dimension) to aid visualizing additional dimensions, but found that this approach has severe limitations when I needed to compute Voronoi cells of lattices in 6 dimensions (because the dimensions use different units I can&#8217;t compare distances meaningfully&#8230; also rigid body transformations are difficult (try rotating from the time dimension towards the color dimension while preserving distances)).  Eventually I got a bit of a &#8220;knack&#8221; for visualizing lattices in 6 dimensions.  Hard to describe, though;  it &#8220;looked&#8221; 3D, but weirder.  It hinges on the lattice being highly symmetrical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-70843</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/#comment-70843</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

Something that bothers me about the title of this article is that philosophers and psychologists have for centuries maintained that we can experience time as a dimension.  Subjective time is known as the &quot;specious present&quot;.

See &lt;a href=&quot;http://newempiricism.blogspot.com/2009/02/time-and-conscious-experience.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Time and conscious experience&lt;/a&gt; for an empirical description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>Something that bothers me about the title of this article is that philosophers and psychologists have for centuries maintained that we can experience time as a dimension.  Subjective time is known as the &#8220;specious present&#8221;.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://newempiricism.blogspot.com/2009/02/time-and-conscious-experience.html" rel="nofollow">Time and conscious experience</a> for an empirical description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schriAlphi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-70400</link>
		<dc:creator>schriAlphi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/#comment-70400</guid>
		<description>Perhaps if the atomic structures of the material that forms some hypothetical newly evolved cortex of the brain - if this atomic material were to contain an axis lying in a fourth direction; let&#039;s say a .0000006 seconds into the future and .0000005 seconds into the past, and with particles at these distances, then information of four space might be able to be processed into perceptual interpretation mediated through the 4-D neurons of this cortex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps if the atomic structures of the material that forms some hypothetical newly evolved cortex of the brain &#8211; if this atomic material were to contain an axis lying in a fourth direction; let&#8217;s say a .0000006 seconds into the future and .0000005 seconds into the past, and with particles at these distances, then information of four space might be able to be processed into perceptual interpretation mediated through the 4-D neurons of this cortex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schriAlphi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-70393</link>
		<dc:creator>schriAlphi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 22:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/30/why-cant-we-visualize-more-than-three-dimensions/#comment-70393</guid>
		<description>Perhaps if the atomic structures of the material that forms some hypothetical newly evolved cortex of the brain - if this atomic material were to contain an axis lying in a fourth direction; let&#039;s say a .0000006 seconds into the future and .0000005 seconds into the past, and with particles at these distances, then information four space might be able to be processed into perceptual interpretation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps if the atomic structures of the material that forms some hypothetical newly evolved cortex of the brain &#8211; if this atomic material were to contain an axis lying in a fourth direction; let&#8217;s say a .0000006 seconds into the future and .0000005 seconds into the past, and with particles at these distances, then information four space might be able to be processed into perceptual interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
