DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« Ships that Pass in the Day
Common Sense for Uncommon Physics »

Remote Views

by John Conway

Inspired by Earth Day (and eerily in sync with Julianne!) I have been looking for good views of the planet from space. In fact, two nights ago my TV satellite provider Dish Network launched the Earth Channel, with a 24/7 view of the earth from the EchoStar 11 satellite. earth1.gifThere is also a video with a compressed 24 hour series of stills taken from the camera. At one point you see the moon passing behind the earth. Of course since it’s a TV satellite, it’s geosynchronous and you’ll only ever see the western hemisphere. As far as I can tell, though, you cannot get it online anywhere.

And this one is pretty cool. Even though the image is not very sharp, you can actually control a little web cam on a the Tate satellite, in polar orbit 400 km above the earth… Add a focus button!

I cannot seem to get NASA’s ISS webcam stream to work. Darn. Too popular? Not Mac compatible?

Sadly, Al Gore’s 1990′s vision of an Earth-viewing satellite, originally called Triana, and later renamed DSCOVR, sits in storage at Goddard, having been built but cancelled in 2006.

Speaking of which, it appeared for some time that a similar fate awaited Nobel Prize winner Sam Ting’s Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, designed to search for antimatter (antihelium nuclei, in fact) and other things in space. Construction of the $1.5 billion satellite was completed, and it awaits launch at CERN. An additional, final Space Shuttle mission, STS-134, was added to the 2010 NASA schedule. It was authorized by Congress in the fall but I am not sure if funding has been appropriated yet. (My money is on Sam Ting, though.)

Anyway, where are the cool views of our planet from space?

Share

April 24th, 2009 10:47 AM
in Miscellany, Space | 12 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

12 Responses to “Remote Views”

  1. 1.   Ethan Siegel Says:
    April 24th, 2009 at 11:45 am

    John,

    I did this for this Earth Day! Perhaps you could start here?

    http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2009/04/earth_day_from_space.php

    Good luck!

    Ethan

  2. 2.   Kevin Runnels Says:
    April 24th, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    I know the Sun gets a day every week (right after Saturday!), but thinking about the shots of the earth from space brought to mind one of my favorite sites.

  3. 3.   changcho Says:
    April 24th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    See here:

    http://www.planetary.org/explore/topics/earth/geostationary.html

    And here (you’ll need to register for his latter one):

    http://www.sat.dundee.ac.uk/browseleaf.html

  4. 4.   IvanM Says:
    April 24th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    “I cannot seem to get NASA’s ISS webcam stream to work.”

    It doesn’t work for me either at the moment. Could be capacity problems, as you suggest.

    I also use a Mac, and I’ve had success using mplayer and/or VLC (www.videolan.org) to play the Windows Media version of their live TV stream. The Quicktime version of the stream has never seemed to work, even using the official Quicktime player. The Realplayer version works in mplayer (crashes VLC, for some reason) but is crappier than the Windows Media version.

    By the way, if you want to use an external player like VLC, you have to become a bit adept at extracting .asx/.asf links to feed to VLC (use VLC’s “Open Network” menu item, btw). In NASA’s case, you can see them inside the javascript: links (it helps if you have your browser’s status bar turned on so that you can see the content of links). They really ought to make it easier to use an external player– I’ll try sending them a comment about that.

  5. 5.   Anonymous Says:
    April 24th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    I wouldn’t bet against Ting either. Too bad AMS has no real scientific justification. It’s an example of a big ego backed by a Nobel Prize successfully bypassing normal peer review procedures to get a pet project funded.

  6. 6.   rbooth Says:
    April 24th, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    I hate to tell you this, but it appears that the Tate satellite is (how can I put this kindly) fictional. See this webpage for an interview where the creator reveals all:
    http://www.dshed.net/digest/04/content/week2/tate_in_space.html

  7. 7.   Pat Says:
    April 25th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    I hope Ting get’s the shot and from what I’ve read about him, he has the chops to make it happen.

    An earlier commenter said, “Too bad AMS has no real scientific justification.” I disagree.

    If AMS does find anti-matter atoms, we would have a better understanding of symmetry-breaking in the early universe. I think more important, the AMS is also going to be detecting cosmic rays — collision events at much higher energies than the LHC.

    If the AMS detects no anti-matter atoms but does detect superpartners (or other speculated high-energy particles), that would be plenty of scientific justification. No anti-matter atoms, in and of itself, would also be an interesting find.

  8. 8.   uncle sam Says:
    April 26th, 2009 at 5:48 am

    This is supposed to be a good site for pics of Earth: http://www.flashearth.com/.
    But nothing (?) compares to the classic shot from Apollo 8 of Earth rising over the Moon’s horizon (remembering all that makes me feel old, as does my first vote for a Presidential candidate younger than me.) BTW, there doesn’t seem to be a big deal going on about the 40th anniversary of the first Moon landing (with inevitable argument over whether we should believe Neil Armstrong’s claim he said “One small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.”

  9. 9.   Marshall Eubanks Says:
    April 26th, 2009 at 8:52 pm

    Start here

    http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/

    and dig. Then there is EUMET sat

    http://oiswww.eumetsat.org/IPPS/html/MSG/RGB/

    This site gives whole Earth views from a variety of satellites :

    http://www.fvalk.com/day_image.htm

  10. 10.   Emily Lakdawalla Says:
    April 27th, 2009 at 11:59 am

    Here’s a page I put together on all the views of Earth I could find, taken by spacecraft that were departing Earth entirely:
    http://planetary.org/explore/topics/earth/spacecraft.html

  11. 11.   Marcos Says:
    April 27th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    One of my favorites, Carl Sagan’s “Pale blue dot”

    http://earthbydavidbrin.pbwiki.com/f/1151367563/earth-pale-blue-dot.jpg

  12. 12.   Wesley Says:
    April 28th, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    [link="http://www.fourmilab.ch/earthview/satellite.html"]http://www.fourmilab.ch/earthview/satellite.html[/link]





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • Dark Matter: Still Existing (One in a Continuing Series)
      • Guest Post: Marc Sher on the Nonprofit Textbook Movement
      • Higgs Ripples in the Koi Pond
      • Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
      • The Case for Naturalism
      • Avengers Assemble!
      • Astronomy at the Philadelphia Science Festival
      • Wrapping Up the Semester: Fests, Workshops and Exams
      • A Universe from Nothing?
      • PhD Comics Explains the Higgs Boson
      • What Particle Are You?
      • The Particle At the End of the Universe
      • Aiming at Different Audiences
      • Puzzles!
      • Jon Stewart Doesn’t Understand How Science Works Even a Little Bit
    • Recent Comments

      • Sunny D on Dark Matter: Still Existing (One in a Continuing Series)
      • scribbler on Dark Matter: Still Existing (One in a Continuing Series)
      • grade 2 titanium on The Problem of Instructions
      • James Goetz on Dark Matter: Still Existing (One in a Continuing Series)
      • cormac on Dark Matter: Still Existing (One in a Continuing Series)
      • Juan Ramón González Álvarez on Dark Matter: Still Existing (One in a Continuing Series)
      • scribbler on Dark Matter: Still Existing (One in a Continuing Series)
      • James Goetz on Dark Matter: Still Existing (One in a Continuing Series)
      • Rangutan on Dark Matter: Still Existing (One in a Continuing Series)
      • Rangutan on Dark Matter: Still Existing (One in a Continuing Series)
      • Low Math, Meekly Interacting on Dark Matter: Still Existing (One in a Continuing Series)
      • Brett on Dark Matter: Still Existing (One in a Continuing Series)
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us