<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Show Explains the LHC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:31:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Noonan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/comment-page-1/#comment-74503</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Noonan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 00:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/#comment-74503</guid>
		<description>The probability of 1 in 50 million of a destructive incident was calculated for RHIC in 1994. At those odds the estimate was half a chance of destruction by 2100. Since no time frame was given a half a chance of destruction is still 50/50. The LHC will create a quark/gluon plasma 25 to 30 times greater with the lead cycle. Presumably the 50/50 option will arrive a whole lot sooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The probability of 1 in 50 million of a destructive incident was calculated for RHIC in 1994. At those odds the estimate was half a chance of destruction by 2100. Since no time frame was given a half a chance of destruction is still 50/50. The LHC will create a quark/gluon plasma 25 to 30 times greater with the lead cycle. Presumably the 50/50 option will arrive a whole lot sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chronik des Universums: April 2009 &#171; Skyweek Zwei Punkt Null</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/comment-page-1/#comment-74246</link>
		<dc:creator>Chronik des Universums: April 2009 &#171; Skyweek Zwei Punkt Null</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/#comment-74246</guid>
		<description>[...] Reparaturarbeiten am LHC machen spürbare Fortschritte: Der letzte Ersatzmagnet ist im Tunnel - aber wie geht&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reparaturarbeiten am LHC machen spürbare Fortschritte: Der letzte Ersatzmagnet ist im Tunnel &#8211; aber wie geht&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellipsis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/comment-page-1/#comment-74237</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellipsis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/#comment-74237</guid>
		<description>Did you know .... that Walter Wagner is the evil twin of Harvey Newman at Caltech?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know &#8230;. that Walter Wagner is the evil twin of Harvey Newman at Caltech?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/comment-page-1/#comment-74129</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/#comment-74129</guid>
		<description>@maddox:  Um, no.  It&#039;s not that these collisions haven&#039;t happened before - it&#039;s that we haven&#039;t been able to do it in an environment that&#039;s controlled and directly observable.  Far more energetic collisions happen in the atmosphere all the time, and though I haven&#039;t looked at the sky in the last hour, no black holes.  That&#039;s why the probability is so low.  Because it&#039;s already been tested.  If we were colliding at energies beyond what the earth has experienced or what we&#039;ve observed in the range of our telescopes, then we might be able to say we don&#039;t know the probability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@maddox:  Um, no.  It&#8217;s not that these collisions haven&#8217;t happened before &#8211; it&#8217;s that we haven&#8217;t been able to do it in an environment that&#8217;s controlled and directly observable.  Far more energetic collisions happen in the atmosphere all the time, and though I haven&#8217;t looked at the sky in the last hour, no black holes.  That&#8217;s why the probability is so low.  Because it&#8217;s already been tested.  If we were colliding at energies beyond what the earth has experienced or what we&#8217;ve observed in the range of our telescopes, then we might be able to say we don&#8217;t know the probability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris W.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/comment-page-1/#comment-74043</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/#comment-74043</guid>
		<description>A bit off-topic: Have you been noticing &lt;a href=&quot;http://discovermagazine.com/2009/may/01-the-biocentric-universe-life-creates-time-space-cosmos&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;what sort of stuff&lt;/a&gt; Discover is publishing lately?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit off-topic: Have you been noticing <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2009/may/01-the-biocentric-universe-life-creates-time-space-cosmos" rel="nofollow">what sort of stuff</a> Discover is publishing lately?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maddox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/comment-page-1/#comment-74037</link>
		<dc:creator>maddox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 22:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/#comment-74037</guid>
		<description>@ NotJohnStewart: ps: If you asked scientists in the 1800s what is the probability for theories like quantum physics, special relativity, and general relativity to be true, they would unanimously 
said 0% !  And they would all have been dead wrong. 

Nobody knows how to calculate this probability since we don&#039;t what new revolution lies ahead. May be we see quantum gravity at the TeV scale against common expectations and no one really understands this theory. Everyone is quoting probabilities out of their ass but the truth is that nobody really knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ NotJohnStewart: ps: If you asked scientists in the 1800s what is the probability for theories like quantum physics, special relativity, and general relativity to be true, they would unanimously<br />
said 0% !  And they would all have been dead wrong. </p>
<p>Nobody knows how to calculate this probability since we don&#8217;t what new revolution lies ahead. May be we see quantum gravity at the TeV scale against common expectations and no one really understands this theory. Everyone is quoting probabilities out of their ass but the truth is that nobody really knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maddox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/comment-page-1/#comment-74031</link>
		<dc:creator>maddox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 21:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/#comment-74031</guid>
		<description>@ NotJohnStewart: Um, yes. at the very least we don&#039;t know what the probability is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ NotJohnStewart: Um, yes. at the very least we don&#8217;t know what the probability is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotJohnStewart</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/comment-page-1/#comment-73987</link>
		<dc:creator>NotJohnStewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/#comment-73987</guid>
		<description>@ maddox: Um, no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ maddox: Um, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graviton383</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/comment-page-1/#comment-73979</link>
		<dc:creator>graviton383</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/#comment-73979</guid>
		<description>z Says: You wouldn&#039;t get that impression after 15min walk through the halls at CERN...I guess the probability is 50%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>z Says: You wouldn&#8217;t get that impression after 15min walk through the halls at CERN&#8230;I guess the probability is 50%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/comment-page-1/#comment-73940</link>
		<dc:creator>z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 01:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/05/01/daily-show-explains-the-lhc/#comment-73940</guid>
		<description>If I were completely clueless about the physics community, one would get the impression from the daily show report that all physicists at the LHC were white males.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were completely clueless about the physics community, one would get the impression from the daily show report that all physicists at the LHC were white males.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
