In order for it to become denser, the DM particles would have to lose energy[*] somehow — but they can’t, at least not on reasonable timescales.

The timescales seem to be more reasonable when forming a DM halo (rather than a pure DM condensation). DM in a mixed cloud of DM and baryonic matter can transfer kinetic energy to the embedded baryonic matter gravitationally and through weak scale interactions. The denser the normal matter, the greater its opportunity for experiencing an acceleration attributable to DM which in turn cools that DM enabling it to follow a closer orbit. DM in regions very sparsely populated by baryonic matter will have far fewer opportunities to do so.

Ah, OK. The short answer is that baryons easily can lose energy via interactions with each other and radiation, and DM cannot.

You can think of DM collapsing into a DM condensation (a DM halo) as a process whereby the DM particles trade potential energy for kinetic energy: they end up losing potential energy by moving closer to the center of the halo, but gain kinetic energy. The result is a DM halo that’s in quasi-equilibrium, with all the DM particles on orbits within the gravitational potential of the halo. This is something denser than the initial smooth background, but not super dense. In order for it to become denser, the DM particles would have to lose energy[*] somehow — but they can’t, at least not on reasonable timescales.

The situation for baryons[**] would be similar, except for the crucial fact that they can interact with each other and give off radiation. So the baryons can lose energy via radiation, and sink closer to the center, and thus the baryon condensation gets denser. Which leads to more frequent baryon-baryon interactions, and more radiation (i.e., the collapsing cloud of gas heats up and glows), which just reinforces the process.

Once it gets going, baryonic collapse tends to stop only when the center is dense enough to resist further collapse, either because it’s hot enough to produce nuclear reactions (which add kinetic energy to the particles) or because pressure support is stable (as in the case of planets, white dwarfs, and neutron stars).

I’m skipping over a lot of details (e.g., baryonic collapse can slow down if the condensation becomes dense enough to be opaque, so that radiation only leaks out at the surface — this is the situation for protostars that haven’t started nuclear fusion yet), but I think that’s the gist of it.

(I realize this doesn’t answer what might be a further question — why are baryons concentrated into lots of different clumps instead of, e.g., one big clump at the center of the galaxy? — but: a) that’s getting into detailed physics of gas-cloud fragmentation and so forth; and b) this comment is long enough as it is…)

[*] Total energy, in the sense of potential + kinetic energy.

[**] This includes electrons, since they’re usually considered part of “baryonic matter” even though they’re really leptons.

I think one would expect that there is more DM in regions of lower gravitational potential and that in principle this can be observed when studying galactic cores, whereas it’s difficult to test this in the solar system because of the low densities as Peter Erwin says at @17.

However, from the point of view of an observer of DM who is at rest while above and rotating with the galaxy, the peculiar motion of the total mass-energy of our solar system (including the DM gravitationally bound up in the solar system) probably appears to leave a clear kelvin wake in the otherwise fairly still (i.e., cold) and sparser galactic DM gas. In due course, some of that gas will be swept up into moving with the solar system, and some of the solar system’s DM will escape.

A similar view will be had for all other solar-system-like clumps of mass-energy in the galaxy, but other than this “stirring”, the vast majority of individual galactic dark matter move in slow and fairly stable orbits about the galactic centre, with negligible chance of being knocked (and in most cases little chance of being dragged) out of the galaxy by radiation, and with very little infalling because there is no more than minuscule amounts of dark chemistry working to clump together dark mass-energy into larger structures that have larger galactic escape velocities. The galactic DM will be denser towards the centre of mass of the galaxy, and there will be some dynamical migration of DM in and out of the galaxy.

This probably continues analogously at still larger scales.

Or, of course, I could be completely out to lunch when I should be having breakfast…

Take the Earth, for example: if the local density of DM is ~ 6 x 10^-25 gm/cm^3 (i.e., 0.35 GeV/cm^3), then within the volume of the Earth (~ 10^27 cm^3), you expect a measly 600 gm of DM. Compared to the total mass of the Earth (6 x 10^27 gm), that’s kind of small….

Similarly, we can ask how much DM there is inside the solar system. Using 50 Astronomical Units (slightly larger than Pluto’s orbit) as a working size, the expected DM is 10^21 gm — which you’ll notice is still much less than the mass of the Earth, let alone the Sun. So gravitational interactions in the solar system will still be dominated by the Sun and the planets.