<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Planck First Light</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/09/17/planck-first-light/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/09/17/planck-first-light/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:30:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter H</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/09/17/planck-first-light/comment-page-1/#comment-99521</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=2539#comment-99521</guid>
		<description>When will WMAP respond to Liu and Li? Planck will need a stick in the sand to move on from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will WMAP respond to Liu and Li? Planck will need a stick in the sand to move on from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric M</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/09/17/planck-first-light/comment-page-1/#comment-96420</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=2539#comment-96420</guid>
		<description>@15: Cosmic Kurtosis rolls off the tongue better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@15: Cosmic Kurtosis rolls off the tongue better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaleberg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/09/17/planck-first-light/comment-page-1/#comment-96383</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaleberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=2539#comment-96383</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of a question I&#039;ve been meaning to ask. I&#039;ve heard that when you fall into a black hole, everything you see above is blue shifted and is much brighter than it was when you started your fall. How bright does the CMB get? Do you need CMB-block? (Obviously, you&#039;ve got bigger problems, but I was kind of wondering and what with the LHC not producing any convenient black holes ...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of a question I&#8217;ve been meaning to ask. I&#8217;ve heard that when you fall into a black hole, everything you see above is blue shifted and is much brighter than it was when you started your fall. How bright does the CMB get? Do you need CMB-block? (Obviously, you&#8217;ve got bigger problems, but I was kind of wondering and what with the LHC not producing any convenient black holes &#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: o1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/09/17/planck-first-light/comment-page-1/#comment-96297</link>
		<dc:creator>o1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=2539#comment-96297</guid>
		<description>I think it won&#039;t be consistent with inflation as I expect CMB to be a result of photon-photon scattering and therefore it should depend on our local Galactic neighborhood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it won&#8217;t be consistent with inflation as I expect CMB to be a result of photon-photon scattering and therefore it should depend on our local Galactic neighborhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Coles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/09/17/planck-first-light/comment-page-1/#comment-96294</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=2539#comment-96294</guid>
		<description>If there is non-Gaussianity you might have to rename this blog &quot;Cosmic Skewness&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is non-Gaussianity you might have to rename this blog &#8220;Cosmic Skewness&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartesian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/09/17/planck-first-light/comment-page-1/#comment-96286</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartesian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=2539#comment-96286</guid>
		<description>Hello,

  It does look like something fractal, see : 
http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/6.html

Cordially</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>  It does look like something fractal, see :<br />
<a href="http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/6.html" rel="nofollow">http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/6.html</a></p>
<p>Cordially</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Siegel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/09/17/planck-first-light/comment-page-1/#comment-96270</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Siegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=2539#comment-96270</guid>
		<description>Sean, I think n_s = 1.00 is even more vanilla, but overall I agree with you.  I&#039;ve just seen so many 2- and 3-sigma results over the years in many different subfields of physics simply get overturned when statistics improve and/or new data comes in.  I think that -- with the exception of non-Gaussianity -- there&#039;s very little that&#039;s going to surprise us about Planck.  But we don&#039;t know until we do the experiment, and that&#039;s why we do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, I think n_s = 1.00 is even more vanilla, but overall I agree with you.  I&#8217;ve just seen so many 2- and 3-sigma results over the years in many different subfields of physics simply get overturned when statistics improve and/or new data comes in.  I think that &#8212; with the exception of non-Gaussianity &#8212; there&#8217;s very little that&#8217;s going to surprise us about Planck.  But we don&#8217;t know until we do the experiment, and that&#8217;s why we do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/09/17/planck-first-light/comment-page-1/#comment-96258</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=2539#comment-96258</guid>
		<description>My predictions:

1. The scale of slow-roll inflation is low

2. No promordial gravity waves are observed

3. The CMB is mostly generated by a late decaying  modulus field and not the inflaton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My predictions:</p>
<p>1. The scale of slow-roll inflation is low</p>
<p>2. No promordial gravity waves are observed</p>
<p>3. The CMB is mostly generated by a late decaying  modulus field and not the inflaton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brando</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/09/17/planck-first-light/comment-page-1/#comment-96229</link>
		<dc:creator>Brando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=2539#comment-96229</guid>
		<description>My question is:  will Alan Guth be happy with the data? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is:  will Alan Guth be happy with the data? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MedallionOfFerret</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/09/17/planck-first-light/comment-page-1/#comment-96213</link>
		<dc:creator>MedallionOfFerret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=2539#comment-96213</guid>
		<description>Hey, I can answer the last question.  There is a preferred direction to space:  down.  I know that may seem a little quarky, but that&#039;s exactly what the data will show.   Is that cool enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I can answer the last question.  There is a preferred direction to space:  down.  I know that may seem a little quarky, but that&#8217;s exactly what the data will show.   Is that cool enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
