Deciphering Life’s Regulatory Code

To : Robert P. Zinzen, EMBL Heidelberg

Re : “Deciphering the regulatory code”

A. From “EMBL scientists take new approach to predict gene expression”
http://www.embl.de/aboutus/communication_outreach/media_relations/2009/091104_Heidelberg/index.html

“What’s exciting for me is that this study shows that it is possible to predict when and where genes are expressed, which is a crucial first step towards understanding how regulatory networks drive development”

B. Organism’s behaviour, its reactions to its environments, are “regulatory networks”?

The above statement by Furlong, translated to 22nd century comprehension, amounts to:

What’s exciting is that this study shows that it is possible to predict when and where organisms react to their environments, which is a crucial first step towards understanding how evolution proceeds.

C. Please consider the following suggestions of the origin and nature of life and organisms, and of the origin and nature of cosmic and life evolution

- Genes, Earth’s primal organisms, and all their take-off organisms – Life in general – are but one of the cosmic forms of mass, of constrained energy formats.

- The on-going cosmic mass-to-energy reversion since the Big-Bang inflation is resisted by mass, this resistance being the archtype of selection for survival by all forms of mass, including life.

- The mode of genes’, Earth’s primal organisms, response to the cultural feed-back signals reaching them from their upper stratum take-off organism is “replicate without change” or “replicate with change”. “Replicate with change” is selected in case of proven augmented energy constrainment by the the new generation, this being “better survival”. This mode of Life’s normal evolution is the mode of energy-mass evolution universally.

Suggesting for your consideration,

Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
Updated Life’s Manifest May 2009
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/140/122.page#2321
Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/180/122.page#3108

i.e. when the Robertson parameters alpha = 1 and gamma = 1/3.

Though this would seem not to be the case for z < 1

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0302088 (eq. 60).