<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You too can be Galileo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/11/11/you-too-can-be-galileo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/11/11/you-too-can-be-galileo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: coolstar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/11/11/you-too-can-be-galileo/#comment-57260</link>
		<dc:creator>coolstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3142#comment-57260</guid>
		<description>In fact, the note I just got from the AAS said a Galileoscope ordered now probably wouldn&#039;t arrive before January (they&#039;ve apparently shipped about 100,000 so far).  A good alternative is the Celestron Firstscope (also an official IYA2009 product).  It&#039;s a 3 inch diameter, rich-field Newtonian for about $45-50.   Better yet would be BOTH of these as the Firstscope comes with much worse eyepieces than the Galileoscope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, the note I just got from the AAS said a Galileoscope ordered now probably wouldn&#8217;t arrive before January (they&#8217;ve apparently shipped about 100,000 so far).  A good alternative is the Celestron Firstscope (also an official IYA2009 product).  It&#8217;s a 3 inch diameter, rich-field Newtonian for about $45-50.   Better yet would be BOTH of these as the Firstscope comes with much worse eyepieces than the Galileoscope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/11/11/you-too-can-be-galileo/#comment-57259</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3142#comment-57259</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this, Daniel!  I&#039;m ordering a bunch of &#039;scopes for my friends (and myself).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, Daniel!  I&#8217;m ordering a bunch of &#8216;scopes for my friends (and myself).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Solomon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/11/11/you-too-can-be-galileo/#comment-57258</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Solomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3142#comment-57258</guid>
		<description>We too can be Galileo? Don&#039;t fuel the cranks! As Sean said, &quot;You are not Galileo. Honestly, you’re not. Dude, seriously.&quot; (http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/06/19/the-alternative-science-respectability-checklist/)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We too can be Galileo? Don&#8217;t fuel the cranks! As Sean said, &#8220;You are not Galileo. Honestly, you’re not. Dude, seriously.&#8221; (<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/06/19/the-alternative-science-respectability-checklist/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/06/19/the-alternative-science-respectability-checklist/</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/11/11/you-too-can-be-galileo/#comment-57257</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3142#comment-57257</guid>
		<description>Daniel,

Isn&#039;t this a little...i don&#039;t know...LATE?
They have been available all year long (I have now ordered 5 total - 1 for myself and 4 as gifts for friends who expressed interest via &quot;funny faces made when viewing through my 10&quot; SCT).

As far as i know, they&#039;ll stop selling them at the end of the year...so i guess it&#039;s good to plug it before the end...but with only a month and a half left, I hope more people jump onto the wagon!

The only problem with the &quot;G&#039;Scope&quot; is that your arm tends to get tired.  A good cheap tripod is in order (and there are quite a few available out there from online stores as well).

I personally recommend taking a small knife, and after attaining optimal focus on the moon, make a little notch on the plastic body of the scope.  This will save time trying to get the moon into focus.  Either that, or use little label-maker tape strips, to set the focus position for various eyepieces, etc!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this a little&#8230;i don&#8217;t know&#8230;LATE?<br />
They have been available all year long (I have now ordered 5 total &#8211; 1 for myself and 4 as gifts for friends who expressed interest via &#8220;funny faces made when viewing through my 10&#8243; SCT).</p>
<p>As far as i know, they&#8217;ll stop selling them at the end of the year&#8230;so i guess it&#8217;s good to plug it before the end&#8230;but with only a month and a half left, I hope more people jump onto the wagon!</p>
<p>The only problem with the &#8220;G&#8217;Scope&#8221; is that your arm tends to get tired.  A good cheap tripod is in order (and there are quite a few available out there from online stores as well).</p>
<p>I personally recommend taking a small knife, and after attaining optimal focus on the moon, make a little notch on the plastic body of the scope.  This will save time trying to get the moon into focus.  Either that, or use little label-maker tape strips, to set the focus position for various eyepieces, etc!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megzor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/11/11/you-too-can-be-galileo/#comment-57256</link>
		<dc:creator>Megzor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3142#comment-57256</guid>
		<description>The simple act of looking through a telescope can make a big impact.  In a panel called “Do we still believe in science?”  http://www.q2cfestival.com/play.php?lecture_id=8015 journalist Natalie Angier suggested that playing with a telescope can peak curiosity, promote an amateur interest in science and can “bring people into the world of discovery,” ultimately encouraging and helping more people to understand and study science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The simple act of looking through a telescope can make a big impact.  In a panel called “Do we still believe in science?”  <a href="http://www.q2cfestival.com/play.php?lecture_id=8015" rel="nofollow">http://www.q2cfestival.com/play.php?lecture_id=8015</a> journalist Natalie Angier suggested that playing with a telescope can peak curiosity, promote an amateur interest in science and can “bring people into the world of discovery,” ultimately encouraging and helping more people to understand and study science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
