<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Higgs in Space!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/01/higgs-in-space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/01/higgs-in-space/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Frost</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/01/higgs-in-space/comment-page-1/#comment-110034</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Frost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3413#comment-110034</guid>
		<description>WIMPS observed in nature =0   
WIMPS observed in &quot;papers&quot; = 1,323,183,220,140,264*

A commanding lead!

*(seems to roughly obey Benford&#039;s law)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WIMPS observed in nature =0<br />
WIMPS observed in &#8220;papers&#8221; = 1,323,183,220,140,264*</p>
<p>A commanding lead!</p>
<p>*(seems to roughly obey Benford&#8217;s law)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/01/higgs-in-space/comment-page-1/#comment-110018</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3413#comment-110018</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tim,

The paper is definitely closer to the line of logic I was considering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tim,</p>
<p>The paper is definitely closer to the line of logic I was considering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Tait</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/01/higgs-in-space/comment-page-1/#comment-110004</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Tait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3413#comment-110004</guid>
		<description>Aaron,

This is not exactly what you are asking, but there was a recent paper which put limits on the elastic scattering cross section of WIMPs such that they do not exchange so much energy that elliptical galaxies collapse into spherical structures:
http://arXiv.org/abs/0911.0422
That seems to be closer to your original question than the worry that WIMPs will annihilate into light particles, which will escape and the galaxies will &#039;evaporate&#039;, which is what would happen if annihilation rates were large.

The above paper claims to put bounds which are on the order of 0.1 GeV^-2 on the elastic cross section.  This is more than a million times larger than a typical WIMP annihilation cross section
(as inferred, say, by the relic density).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron,</p>
<p>This is not exactly what you are asking, but there was a recent paper which put limits on the elastic scattering cross section of WIMPs such that they do not exchange so much energy that elliptical galaxies collapse into spherical structures:<br />
<a href="http://arXiv.org/abs/0911.0422" rel="nofollow">http://arXiv.org/abs/0911.0422</a><br />
That seems to be closer to your original question than the worry that WIMPs will annihilate into light particles, which will escape and the galaxies will &#8216;evaporate&#8217;, which is what would happen if annihilation rates were large.</p>
<p>The above paper claims to put bounds which are on the order of 0.1 GeV^-2 on the elastic cross section.  This is more than a million times larger than a typical WIMP annihilation cross section<br />
(as inferred, say, by the relic density).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/01/higgs-in-space/comment-page-1/#comment-109991</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3413#comment-109991</guid>
		<description>Can you put some specific limits on what is &quot;not nearly fast enough&quot; from the stability of galaxies and clusters, and then work out how much excess radiation we should expect to see?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you put some specific limits on what is &#8220;not nearly fast enough&#8221; from the stability of galaxies and clusters, and then work out how much excess radiation we should expect to see?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/01/higgs-in-space/comment-page-1/#comment-109990</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3413#comment-109990</guid>
		<description>Aaron, generally it&#039;s a matter of numbers; the dark matter can lose energy, but not nearly fast enough to affect its dynamics in a galaxy or cluster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, generally it&#8217;s a matter of numbers; the dark matter can lose energy, but not nearly fast enough to affect its dynamics in a galaxy or cluster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/01/higgs-in-space/comment-page-1/#comment-109988</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3413#comment-109988</guid>
		<description>How do you re-heat the dark matter to keep it from collapsing, if there is any process by which dark matter can loose energy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you re-heat the dark matter to keep it from collapsing, if there is any process by which dark matter can loose energy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartesian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/01/higgs-in-space/comment-page-1/#comment-109987</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartesian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3413#comment-109987</guid>
		<description>And about the boson show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And about the boson show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartesian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/01/higgs-in-space/comment-page-1/#comment-109981</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartesian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3413#comment-109981</guid>
		<description>I did try arxiv but I am not from a university, so it is not possible for me to publish there. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did try arxiv but I am not from a university, so it is not possible for me to publish there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Fry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/01/higgs-in-space/comment-page-1/#comment-109979</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Fry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3413#comment-109979</guid>
		<description>They state that this is the  &quot;perfect mass range for searches with the Fermi LAT&quot;. Testable predictions are good, but their final statement is dreamy, &quot;As we explore the weak scale, we expect the dynamics of the electroweak breaking to be revealed. It may be that its secrets already shine down from the sky, produced by dark matter annihilation.&quot;

And  of course there is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4zV4pJ8MwM&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bowie in Space&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They state that this is the  &#8220;perfect mass range for searches with the Fermi LAT&#8221;. Testable predictions are good, but their final statement is dreamy, &#8220;As we explore the weak scale, we expect the dynamics of the electroweak breaking to be revealed. It may be that its secrets already shine down from the sky, produced by dark matter annihilation.&#8221;</p>
<p>And  of course there is <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4zV4pJ8MwM" rel="nofollow">Bowie in Space</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Tait</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/01/higgs-in-space/comment-page-1/#comment-109975</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Tait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3413#comment-109975</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean,

Thanks for the &quot;award&quot;!

In a recent talk at Davis ( http://hep.ps.uci.edu/~tait/talks/Davis-WIMP%20Forest.pdf page 37 or so) Max Chertok anticipated the Muppet connection about 5 slides before I got to it... I had underestimated how strong the association is, I guess...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean,</p>
<p>Thanks for the &#8220;award&#8221;!</p>
<p>In a recent talk at Davis ( <a href="http://hep.ps.uci.edu/~tait/talks/Davis-WIMP%20Forest.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://hep.ps.uci.edu/~tait/talks/Davis-WIMP%20Forest.pdf</a> page 37 or so) Max Chertok anticipated the Muppet connection about 5 slides before I got to it&#8230; I had underestimated how strong the association is, I guess&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Bergman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/01/higgs-in-space/comment-page-1/#comment-109971</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Bergman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=3413#comment-109971</guid>
		<description>And here I thought it was referring to &lt;a href = &quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_jLnrUXJNM&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here I thought it was referring to <a href = "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_jLnrUXJNM" rel="nofollow">this</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 14:31:43 -->
