<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miss USA Contestants on Teaching Evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:35:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165898</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165898</guid>
		<description>@Michael: Phillip&#039;s point is this: If telling students nothing about evolution is the best way to educate them about evolution, why not tell them nothing about every subject? Why have schools at all?

Your argument, as I understand it, is that you&#039;re glad that no one tried to teach you evolution until you were prepared for the challenge to your existing beliefs. But in that argument, you&#039;re acknowledging that you cannot educate people without challenging their beliefs. Having your beliefs challenged is healthy, and a vital part of any real education. However, there&#039;s a big gap between &#039;evolution happens&#039; and &#039;religion is stupid&#039;. The majority of Americans believe the first and not the second. We can, and should, teach evolution to every student without spitting on religion. Challenging a belief in literal creationism is not the same as challenging religion as a whole.

We teach children about science because science produces great insights about how our world works. Understanding life on Earth is important, and you can&#039;t fully understand life on Earth without understanding evolution. It is good to avoid unwanted pregnancy and STDs, but there is more to life than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael: Phillip&#8217;s point is this: If telling students nothing about evolution is the best way to educate them about evolution, why not tell them nothing about every subject? Why have schools at all?</p>
<p>Your argument, as I understand it, is that you&#8217;re glad that no one tried to teach you evolution until you were prepared for the challenge to your existing beliefs. But in that argument, you&#8217;re acknowledging that you cannot educate people without challenging their beliefs. Having your beliefs challenged is healthy, and a vital part of any real education. However, there&#8217;s a big gap between &#8216;evolution happens&#8217; and &#8216;religion is stupid&#8217;. The majority of Americans believe the first and not the second. We can, and should, teach evolution to every student without spitting on religion. Challenging a belief in literal creationism is not the same as challenging religion as a whole.</p>
<p>We teach children about science because science produces great insights about how our world works. Understanding life on Earth is important, and you can&#8217;t fully understand life on Earth without understanding evolution. It is good to avoid unwanted pregnancy and STDs, but there is more to life than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165889</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what &#039;anything&#039; you refer to when you say my argument can be used to justify anything.  About the only thing I can think of that the argument could also be used to justify is an avoidance of teaching around sexuality and tolerance of differing sexuality in high school.  However my argument for the avoidance of evolution relies on the fact that there is no practical benefit to learning about evolution, whereas learning about sexuality can reduce unwanted pregnancy, reduce discrimination, sexual diseases etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what &#8216;anything&#8217; you refer to when you say my argument can be used to justify anything.  About the only thing I can think of that the argument could also be used to justify is an avoidance of teaching around sexuality and tolerance of differing sexuality in high school.  However my argument for the avoidance of evolution relies on the fact that there is no practical benefit to learning about evolution, whereas learning about sexuality can reduce unwanted pregnancy, reduce discrimination, sexual diseases etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Helbig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165858</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Helbig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165858</guid>
		<description>@49: The problem with that is that this argument can be used to justify anything.  Also, your last sentence is probably wrong since in countries where evolution is taught in schools with no ifs, and or buts there is much less opposition to science than in God&#039;s Own Country (which, as Pat Robertson recently informed us, is going down the drain anyway since the US has now &quot;embraced&quot; gay marriage).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@49: The problem with that is that this argument can be used to justify anything.  Also, your last sentence is probably wrong since in countries where evolution is taught in schools with no ifs, and or buts there is much less opposition to science than in God&#8217;s Own Country (which, as Pat Robertson recently informed us, is going down the drain anyway since the US has now &#8220;embraced&#8221; gay marriage).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165843</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 04:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165843</guid>
		<description>Why should evolution be taught at schools?  When I was at high school I distinctly remember my science teacher carefully skirting around the issue and saying stuff like &#039;who knows whether life really evolved as stated or whether God was there guiding things along the way&#039;.  Some of you may be horrified at this and would strongly prefer that the teacher had told me that life evolved, and religion is stupid.  But consider what would have happened if my teacher had taught me that.  At the time I was very much under the influence of my strongly religious parents and I&#039;m sure I would have rejected science as a danger to my faith.  Instead I avoided a confrontation between my religious upbringing and my burgeoning exposure to scientific thought, and continued on to study science at university.  This confrontation then happened several years later when I was much more able to think independantly of my parents influence and decide that all reasonable evidence pointed towards an earth that is 4.5 billion years old, and on which life has evolved.

Perhaps the hatred and ignorance of science in America is partly fueled by the teaching of evolution in schools?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should evolution be taught at schools?  When I was at high school I distinctly remember my science teacher carefully skirting around the issue and saying stuff like &#8216;who knows whether life really evolved as stated or whether God was there guiding things along the way&#8217;.  Some of you may be horrified at this and would strongly prefer that the teacher had told me that life evolved, and religion is stupid.  But consider what would have happened if my teacher had taught me that.  At the time I was very much under the influence of my strongly religious parents and I&#8217;m sure I would have rejected science as a danger to my faith.  Instead I avoided a confrontation between my religious upbringing and my burgeoning exposure to scientific thought, and continued on to study science at university.  This confrontation then happened several years later when I was much more able to think independantly of my parents influence and decide that all reasonable evidence pointed towards an earth that is 4.5 billion years old, and on which life has evolved.</p>
<p>Perhaps the hatred and ignorance of science in America is partly fueled by the teaching of evolution in schools?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165818</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165818</guid>
		<description>Assume that one of the &quot;contestants&quot;, (snort) gave an answer that caused a paradigm shift in the thinking of educators and philosophers of science. A hugely profound, epiphany generating concept. It wouldn&#039;t help her overcome a flat chest and kankles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assume that one of the &#8220;contestants&#8221;, (snort) gave an answer that caused a paradigm shift in the thinking of educators and philosophers of science. A hugely profound, epiphany generating concept. It wouldn&#8217;t help her overcome a flat chest and kankles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shams</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165816</link>
		<dc:creator>shams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165816</guid>
		<description>@Federico
&lt;blockquote&gt;the war on evolution isn’t just in the US.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The difference is that in America the flat-earthers have power.  One of the two major political parties is wholly religious, white conservative christian.
Its the electoral demographics of Distributed Jesusland&#8482;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Federico</p>
<blockquote><p>the war on evolution isn’t just in the US.</p></blockquote>
<p>The difference is that in America the flat-earthers have power.  One of the two major political parties is wholly religious, white conservative christian.<br />
Its the electoral demographics of Distributed Jesusland&trade;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federico</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165786</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165786</guid>
		<description>By the way: the war on evolution isn&#039;t just in the US. I happened to dial a catholic church radio in Spain trying to brain-wash the audience against evolution. 
It just doesn&#039;t catch here, fortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way: the war on evolution isn&#8217;t just in the US. I happened to dial a catholic church radio in Spain trying to brain-wash the audience against evolution.<br />
It just doesn&#8217;t catch here, fortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federico</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165785</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165785</guid>
		<description>Kansas hurts! Couldn&#039;t go on. &quot;It shouldn&#039;t be taught because there are so many different views of it&quot;. No words!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kansas hurts! Couldn&#8217;t go on. &#8220;It shouldn&#8217;t be taught because there are so many different views of it&#8221;. No words!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165781</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165781</guid>
		<description>@Ron: That&#039;s a horrible analogy.  Math is not a theory.  Evolution is.  They just both happen to be models.

Math is taught primarily because it 1) is useful for getting through life and building more specific models for getting through life, and 2) it exercises critical thinking skills.

Thanks for posting the video though!  It really codifies how misguided your argument is!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ron: That&#8217;s a horrible analogy.  Math is not a theory.  Evolution is.  They just both happen to be models.</p>
<p>Math is taught primarily because it 1) is useful for getting through life and building more specific models for getting through life, and 2) it exercises critical thinking skills.</p>
<p>Thanks for posting the video though!  It really codifies how misguided your argument is!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165776</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165776</guid>
		<description>@30. Bill: &quot;Scientists were laughed at when they proposed the Earth Revolved around the sun, and when they suggested the Earth was round. If “Scientific fact” remained as-is, we would still be teaching those wrong ideas in schools today. I’m thankful our scientific fore-fathers didn’t carry such a nasty closed-minded attitude, or we would still be banging rocks together to make fire.&quot;

Once the science of heliocentrism was proven, nobody was laughing at it (actually, it had more to do with religious leaders opposing it - sound familiar?). And, contrary to popular belief, it has been known for a long, long time that the earth was round. Do you have any examples of people laughing at that idea, or is that just a strawman?

That you think that it was the scientific community that fought these ideas is odd, to say the least. And making a comparison with evolution through natural selection vs &quot;creationism&quot; is simply bizarre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@30. Bill: &#8220;Scientists were laughed at when they proposed the Earth Revolved around the sun, and when they suggested the Earth was round. If “Scientific fact” remained as-is, we would still be teaching those wrong ideas in schools today. I’m thankful our scientific fore-fathers didn’t carry such a nasty closed-minded attitude, or we would still be banging rocks together to make fire.&#8221;</p>
<p>Once the science of heliocentrism was proven, nobody was laughing at it (actually, it had more to do with religious leaders opposing it &#8211; sound familiar?). And, contrary to popular belief, it has been known for a long, long time that the earth was round. Do you have any examples of people laughing at that idea, or is that just a strawman?</p>
<p>That you think that it was the scientific community that fought these ideas is odd, to say the least. And making a comparison with evolution through natural selection vs &#8220;creationism&#8221; is simply bizarre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165772</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165772</guid>
		<description>Should Math Be Taught in Schools? 
&lt;i&gt;&quot;Math is just a theory....&quot; Teach the controversy.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QBv2CFTSWU&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QBv2CFTSWU&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should Math Be Taught in Schools?<br />
<i>&#8220;Math is just a theory&#8230;.&#8221; Teach the controversy.</i><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QBv2CFTSWU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QBv2CFTSWU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shams</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165771</link>
		<dc:creator>shams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165771</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Very sad indeed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A lot of things about America are sad today.  Unfortunately anglosaxon protestant objectivism and randian free market economics have turned out to be a poison pill for America.

&lt;blockquote&gt;  They are stupider &lt;/blockquote&gt;
America has extreme high incidence of creationism and AGW denialism for the same reason.  The negative correlation of religiosity with cognitive ability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Very sad indeed.</p></blockquote>
<p>A lot of things about America are sad today.  Unfortunately anglosaxon protestant objectivism and randian free market economics have turned out to be a poison pill for America.</p>
<blockquote><p>  They are stupider </p></blockquote>
<p>America has extreme high incidence of creationism and AGW denialism for the same reason.  The negative correlation of religiosity with cognitive ability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165770</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165770</guid>
		<description>@35: And what the meaning of the word &quot;better&quot; means the way you use, i.e., most probable given some prior expectation (in this case, the prior is that any phenomena that man has yet to observe is unlikely - a higher power, etc).  

They should also know that if you chose some sort of other prior - like an equal chance of there being a higher power or not (which is perhaps more reasonable, since we cannot directly observe it, and non-observations are should not be weighted heavily, ala the bayesian solution to the black ravens paradox) - then alternative theories, like the universe being created 100 years ago and made to look like it was created 15 billion years ago - are perhaps &quot;better&quot;.

Induction is all kind of subjective, you see.  That&#039;s why reasonable people can disagree on things like this - and why people that dismiss other people&#039;s beliefs out of hand as illogical or irrational are, in fact, themselves being irrational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@35: And what the meaning of the word &#8220;better&#8221; means the way you use, i.e., most probable given some prior expectation (in this case, the prior is that any phenomena that man has yet to observe is unlikely &#8211; a higher power, etc).  </p>
<p>They should also know that if you chose some sort of other prior &#8211; like an equal chance of there being a higher power or not (which is perhaps more reasonable, since we cannot directly observe it, and non-observations are should not be weighted heavily, ala the bayesian solution to the black ravens paradox) &#8211; then alternative theories, like the universe being created 100 years ago and made to look like it was created 15 billion years ago &#8211; are perhaps &#8220;better&#8221;.</p>
<p>Induction is all kind of subjective, you see.  That&#8217;s why reasonable people can disagree on things like this &#8211; and why people that dismiss other people&#8217;s beliefs out of hand as illogical or irrational are, in fact, themselves being irrational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165769</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165769</guid>
		<description>&quot;The question wasn’t even “should we teach creationism,” which is actually a harder issue (although still very easy).&quot;  

^This is exactly how I feel.  I&#039;m not mad at silly pageant contestants, many of whom probably come from the most conservative fringes of society.  I&#039;m frustrated that some pageant organizer thought that evolution, not creationism, was the more controversial and school-inappropriate concept.

I also wonder how answers would have been different if the question had been phrased the other way, particularly given pageant girls&#039; desire to be nice and inclusive.  Would we at least have gotten one &quot;No creationism&quot; response if it was phrased differently?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The question wasn’t even “should we teach creationism,” which is actually a harder issue (although still very easy).&#8221;  </p>
<p>^This is exactly how I feel.  I&#8217;m not mad at silly pageant contestants, many of whom probably come from the most conservative fringes of society.  I&#8217;m frustrated that some pageant organizer thought that evolution, not creationism, was the more controversial and school-inappropriate concept.</p>
<p>I also wonder how answers would have been different if the question had been phrased the other way, particularly given pageant girls&#8217; desire to be nice and inclusive.  Would we at least have gotten one &#8220;No creationism&#8221; response if it was phrased differently?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Helbig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165765</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Helbig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165765</guid>
		<description>37. makes the correct reply to 36.  Another reply to 36. is that all serious historians agree that the primary reason for the success of Hitler was the Treaty of Versailles, which literally imposed reparations on the children&#039;s children&#039;s children (and Germany didn&#039;t even start the first World War, they just lost).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>37. makes the correct reply to 36.  Another reply to 36. is that all serious historians agree that the primary reason for the success of Hitler was the Treaty of Versailles, which literally imposed reparations on the children&#8217;s children&#8217;s children (and Germany didn&#8217;t even start the first World War, they just lost).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165759</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165759</guid>
		<description>@Steve Turrentine: 
True, but these &#039;activities&#039; happened themselves over 60 years ago. And what does this have to do with Sean&#039;s statement anyway? He wrote &quot;here we are, in the most advanced country in the world&quot; and not &quot;60 years ago, we were...&quot;. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve Turrentine:<br />
True, but these &#8216;activities&#8217; happened themselves over 60 years ago. And what does this have to do with Sean&#8217;s statement anyway? He wrote &#8220;here we are, in the most advanced country in the world&#8221; and not &#8220;60 years ago, we were&#8230;&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Turrentine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165752</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Turrentine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165752</guid>
		<description>@33 RE: Wilde quote
Mr. Helbig neglects to mention that Wilde died well over 100 yrs. ago &amp; therefore obviously wouldn&#039;t know what&#039;s going on now.  He also conveniently forgets that if it weren&#039;t for the U.S. there&#039;d be no civilization in Europe either, due to the activities of certain Germans approx. 40 yrs. after Wilde&#039;s death ...  (g)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@33 RE: Wilde quote<br />
Mr. Helbig neglects to mention that Wilde died well over 100 yrs. ago &amp; therefore obviously wouldn&#8217;t know what&#8217;s going on now.  He also conveniently forgets that if it weren&#8217;t for the U.S. there&#8217;d be no civilization in Europe either, due to the activities of certain Germans approx. 40 yrs. after Wilde&#8217;s death &#8230;  (g)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Helbig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165748</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Helbig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165748</guid>
		<description>And (#34) that, as scientific explanations go, it is much, much, much better than creationism, which is the &quot;alternative&quot; in these conversations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And (#34) that, as scientific explanations go, it is much, much, much better than creationism, which is the &#8220;alternative&#8221; in these conversations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165747</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165747</guid>
		<description>Bah.  Before evolution is taught in schools, the philosophy of science should be.  Then at least kids would understand that our current theory of evolution is an application of Occam&#039;s Razor to a bunch of theories that could explain the way that humans came into being, that it is a theory (and what a theory is), that it is just a model (and what a model is), and that it is incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah.  Before evolution is taught in schools, the philosophy of science should be.  Then at least kids would understand that our current theory of evolution is an application of Occam&#8217;s Razor to a bunch of theories that could explain the way that humans came into being, that it is a theory (and what a theory is), that it is just a model (and what a model is), and that it is incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Helbig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/24/miss-usa-contestants-on-teaching-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-165743</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Helbig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=6960#comment-165743</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;&quot;in the most advanced country in the world&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

In what sense?

Yes, the US will turn up at the top in some things simply because of the large population.  Unless that is &quot;advanced&quot; per se, one definitely has to talk about some measure of advancedness (however one defines it) per unit population size.  Does the US still come up tops anywhere?  If so, where?

I can think of a couple of dozen countries which, though not perfect, are certainly more advanced in the US, with &quot;advanced&quot; meaning that I would prefer to live there.

As Oscar Wilde said, the US is the only country which went from barbarism to decadence without civilisation in-between.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;in the most advanced country in the world&#8221;</i></p>
<p>In what sense?</p>
<p>Yes, the US will turn up at the top in some things simply because of the large population.  Unless that is &#8220;advanced&#8221; per se, one definitely has to talk about some measure of advancedness (however one defines it) per unit population size.  Does the US still come up tops anywhere?  If so, where?</p>
<p>I can think of a couple of dozen countries which, though not perfect, are certainly more advanced in the US, with &#8220;advanced&#8221; meaning that I would prefer to live there.</p>
<p>As Oscar Wilde said, the US is the only country which went from barbarism to decadence without civilisation in-between.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 14:53:56 -->
