<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Python</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/09/08/python/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/09/08/python/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/09/08/python/#comment-72203</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=7442#comment-72203</guid>
		<description>I  had the same problem - finding good python resources. But I fought my way through it and have quite a few self-written sample programs I would be happy to zip up and send you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  had the same problem &#8211; finding good python resources. But I fought my way through it and have quite a few self-written sample programs I would be happy to zip up and send you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Helbig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/09/08/python/#comment-72202</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Helbig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=7442#comment-72202</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;&quot;Fortran was your previous “language of choice”? Good heavens. That language scares the bejezus out of me.&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

Have you ever actually used it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Fortran was your previous “language of choice”? Good heavens. That language scares the bejezus out of me.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Have you ever actually used it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak Vaid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/09/08/python/#comment-72201</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak Vaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 16:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=7442#comment-72201</guid>
		<description>Dear Sean,

Fortran was your previous &quot;language of choice&quot;? Good heavens. That language scares the bejezus out of me.

About Python. The problem with Python is that there are so many versions 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 and now 3.x. And having installed a version you have to install all the modules for that version all over again. Then when you&#039;ve gone through all that you find that one module doesn&#039;t work with the Python version you installed, so you start all over again with a different version ...

Enthought&#039;s Python Distribution (built around Python 2.7) (EPD) - which is free for academic use, btw (!) - has solved these problems for me. It contains every toolset the modern physicist could need. All of Scipy, Numpy, IDLE, Mayavi, you-name-it, EPD has it.

You&#039;ll probably need to install OpenGL and PyQt4 separately if you want to do some serious graphics programming. OpenGL is straightforward enough. PyQt4 is extremely tedious but straightforward to install. But its worth the effort. You&#039;re left with the Python bindings for Nokia&#039;s Qt api which is far superior to wxWidgets and other alternatives for building GUI apps. EPD + PyQt4 + OpenGL rocks!

Good luck on your Python adventures,

Deepak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sean,</p>
<p>Fortran was your previous &#8220;language of choice&#8221;? Good heavens. That language scares the bejezus out of me.</p>
<p>About Python. The problem with Python is that there are so many versions 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 and now 3.x. And having installed a version you have to install all the modules for that version all over again. Then when you&#8217;ve gone through all that you find that one module doesn&#8217;t work with the Python version you installed, so you start all over again with a different version &#8230;</p>
<p>Enthought&#8217;s Python Distribution (built around Python 2.7) (EPD) &#8211; which is free for academic use, btw (!) &#8211; has solved these problems for me. It contains every toolset the modern physicist could need. All of Scipy, Numpy, IDLE, Mayavi, you-name-it, EPD has it.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll probably need to install OpenGL and PyQt4 separately if you want to do some serious graphics programming. OpenGL is straightforward enough. PyQt4 is extremely tedious but straightforward to install. But its worth the effort. You&#8217;re left with the Python bindings for Nokia&#8217;s Qt api which is far superior to wxWidgets and other alternatives for building GUI apps. EPD + PyQt4 + OpenGL rocks!</p>
<p>Good luck on your Python adventures,</p>
<p>Deepak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Nourie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/09/08/python/#comment-72200</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Nourie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=7442#comment-72200</guid>
		<description>Sean,

Python is excellent, and scientists use it a lot. If you Google python applications, you will get lots and lots of app written by scientists.

Ruby is also great, as well as Ruby on Rails for those who want to do web development.

By and far the best and funniest programming book ever is Poignant Guide to Ruby:
http://mislav.uniqpath.com/poignant-guide/book/

Read some of it even if you have no interest in Ruby programming. It&#039;s hilarious and a great model for making tech material fun! Plus, it&#039;s free!

Dana</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,</p>
<p>Python is excellent, and scientists use it a lot. If you Google python applications, you will get lots and lots of app written by scientists.</p>
<p>Ruby is also great, as well as Ruby on Rails for those who want to do web development.</p>
<p>By and far the best and funniest programming book ever is Poignant Guide to Ruby:<br />
<a href="http://mislav.uniqpath.com/poignant-guide/book/" rel="nofollow">http://mislav.uniqpath.com/poignant-guide/book/</a></p>
<p>Read some of it even if you have no interest in Ruby programming. It&#8217;s hilarious and a great model for making tech material fun! Plus, it&#8217;s free!</p>
<p>Dana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Helbig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/09/08/python/#comment-72199</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Helbig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=7442#comment-72199</guid>
		<description>Fortran (the current standard is Fortran 2008) is still there and is great for number crunching and graphics.  Don&#039;t give up on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortran (the current standard is Fortran 2008) is still there and is great for number crunching and graphics.  Don&#8217;t give up on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Shoemate</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/09/08/python/#comment-72198</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Shoemate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=7442#comment-72198</guid>
		<description>I would also recommend Javascript. Combined with html and css (which you must already work with a little on this blog) you can do just about anything and have it ready to share online. Make sure you look at jQuery (a javascript set of functions for doing some fancy stuff and making basic stuff easy). Javascript, as one of the languages of the web, is by far the most well documented (since the internet is very vain and loves to talk about itself - it&#039;s self documenting).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also recommend Javascript. Combined with html and css (which you must already work with a little on this blog) you can do just about anything and have it ready to share online. Make sure you look at jQuery (a javascript set of functions for doing some fancy stuff and making basic stuff easy). Javascript, as one of the languages of the web, is by far the most well documented (since the internet is very vain and loves to talk about itself &#8211; it&#8217;s self documenting).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Flask</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/09/08/python/#comment-72197</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Flask</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=7442#comment-72197</guid>
		<description>Python is a good way to go. Here is a crazy thought. For something completely different there is Javascript. The advantage to that is that you could easily publish Javascript programs on web browsers. However, Javascript environments are probably harder to work with than Python.

Someone else may point you to tools that allow you to publish Python scripts onto browsers too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Python is a good way to go. Here is a crazy thought. For something completely different there is Javascript. The advantage to that is that you could easily publish Javascript programs on web browsers. However, Javascript environments are probably harder to work with than Python.</p>
<p>Someone else may point you to tools that allow you to publish Python scripts onto browsers too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/09/08/python/#comment-72196</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 01:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=7442#comment-72196</guid>
		<description>Have you considered MATLAB? Most valuable tool I&#039;ve ever used in 40 years of engineering analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you considered MATLAB? Most valuable tool I&#8217;ve ever used in 40 years of engineering analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/09/08/python/#comment-72195</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=7442#comment-72195</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an observational astronomer, but we use python all the time, for everything from scripting massive pulsar survey processing jobs to analyzing X-ray observations to simulating pulsar timing noise. I&#039;ve got a blog where from time to time I do a sort of &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lighthouseinthesky.blogspot.com/search/label/python&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;worked example&lt;/a&gt;&quot; of solving some (usually) astrophysical problem with python, that you might find useful as a more apropos example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an observational astronomer, but we use python all the time, for everything from scripting massive pulsar survey processing jobs to analyzing X-ray observations to simulating pulsar timing noise. I&#8217;ve got a blog where from time to time I do a sort of &#8220;<a href="http://lighthouseinthesky.blogspot.com/search/label/python" rel="nofollow">worked example</a>&#8221; of solving some (usually) astrophysical problem with python, that you might find useful as a more apropos example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Limits</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/09/08/python/#comment-72194</link>
		<dc:creator>Limits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/?p=7442#comment-72194</guid>
		<description>The real question is how much programming and processing you need to perform for the task at hand.

http://nosingularity.blogspot.com/2011/09/riduculousness-of-processing-and.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real question is how much programming and processing you need to perform for the task at hand.</p>
<p><a href="http://nosingularity.blogspot.com/2011/09/riduculousness-of-processing-and.html" rel="nofollow">http://nosingularity.blogspot.com/2011/09/riduculousness-of-processing-and.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
