Soon to be published. All of this shown..and much, much more.

A long overdue revolution in physics will be shown, and it will be clear as to why modern physics is so off track/lost.

I do not exaggerate.

“Our growth and becoming other than we are” will be shown to generally unify physics.

Indeed, to what extent can physics demonstrate “Our growth and becoming other than we are”? This is THE question.

Inflation mimicks our growth and development. This is why it appears to have some validity (to some physicists).

The body is central and fundamental to any fundamental unification of physics.

Ultimate truth in physics is not found in the inanimate. That is a fact.

Its seems perfectly reasonable to these guys to take for granted the trillion billion to the umpteenth millionth power of 7′s that need to be rolled for our universe

– but if they thought for just one moment that a multiverse would produce a universe with 8 billion suns all lined up together to spell “THIS IS THE AWESOME MULTIVERSE I IMAGINED SO I COULD DO AWAY WITH THE OBVIOUS”(because that would take less 7′s than this universe) maybe they’d consider the absurdity of it all but you know what?. They just couldnt because the answer they wish to avoid , which is that an intelligent creator designed the universe, isnt like just getting a multiple choice question wrong—its the biggest mistake you can make and a powerful bias.

And they say man created God so they would feel alone? Just now its occurring to you that it’s because it’s just blatantly obvious? So obvious you just jumped the shark into universes that have elephant shaped atoms and nebula’s that look exactly like Angelina Jolie(again..less 7′s rolled for that)–because thats where infinity takes you—or is your multiverse only filled with what you deem rational?

Has it ever occurred to you that the very act of inflation and all the principles required therein requires design? Science seems to want to start with all their definitions in place and they skip the part where the very principles and actions they are talking about are as insurmountably improbable as what occurs after inflation. Next, they’ll be in infinite amount of nothingness to have “something”, (the very laws that cause inflation, space, cause and effect, heat, motion), spring forth from.

Newton’s second and third laws ultimately demonstrate/point to inertial and gravitational equivalency and balancing (FUNDAMENTALLY) in keeping with combining and including opposites.

Gravity and inertia must both be at half strength/force. I have demonstrated the fundamental, theoretical/ideal, and actual manifestation and union of the forces/energy of physics. Soon to be published. It addresses everything in this post. The readers will love it. I promise a fundamental and true revolution in physics that will address why modern physics is basically lost.

I’m sorry, but this discusssion is not complete and realistic without this underpinning.
Always keep an open mind. Seriously.

There I was hoping he’d keep his religion out of his science, but then he goes and spoils the whole damn thing.

but seriously: sharing a discussion like this is the best use of a blog I can think of. it’s absolutely great, thank you!

Can a black hole in asymptotically de sitter space have a temperature lower than the temperature of the empty de sitter space?

If so, isn’t it expcected that such a black hole will grow forever if it ever forms? Further, won’t such a black hole form with finite probability in an empty de sitter space (since de sitter space has a finite temperature)? Does this change the logic that leads one to conclude that the universe has a finite dimensional hilbert space?

Almost all that is plausible is possible in this most plausible of all possible worlds.