happy new year!

Yes, and changing magnetic fields will induce electric currents.

As well, protons will not be found to decay; but neutrons will continue to do so when isolated.

I second that. However, I predict that none of them will tell us that the panda eats, shoots, and leaves.

How aboot ontological inertia will continue?

The cops who sprayed the students will be similarly employed.

Re #3, I take it “planet” doesn’t include exoplanets. ;-P

*Spelling error, I definitely meant “…as something.”I hate ipod keyboards sometimes. Laugh it up, clowns…

Could the laws of conservation have something to do with separating space and time? Is it possible that in order to separate space and time, you might need to think about relativity in terms of quantum mechanics and something like electromagnetism?

These are all very abstract connections that may support the idea that F=ma might be a huge part of why you cant seem to separate space and time in relativity, and in the end solving problems associated with it. Things like geometry really become important, I presume, especally considering if you think about vectors as a form of energy that does some kind of physical “work, simply put. These all have solid connections somehow, I’m just curious to how this might work.

What if we already seperate space and time physically just by the way we percieve both as independent from each other in any way? Maybe whatever makes us “percieve” time as numbers and “space” and something that automatically suggests it’s big and empty, seriously has something to do with the laws of conservation?

(It’s more obvious to me using common sense that space and time are entangled with each other, and some force of resistance would be needed to seperate them in any way, locally or non-locally.)

Perhaps #5 just needs “to good approximation for gases not circa phase transition under conditions assayed”, as I’ve observed myself on numerous occasions.

WOW, Chris, we are all impressed with your knowledge of Physics 101 (2nd Semester)!

This is completely wrong. This is only true for an ideal gas which assumes there is no volume to the gas molecules and zero intermolecular attraction. The van der Waals equation is the most common correction to the ideal gas law, however it has its problems at high pressures and low temperatures. The virial equation does the best, although it is a not that convenient to use.

” “unsecured people”

Tintin, I’m sure your meant “insecure people”, no?”

I’m sure correcting my typing skills must have also made you feel superior. Anything to help the “unsecure.”

1. The sun will continue to burn Hydrogen

2. People will still be driving cars that burn fossil fuels.

3. HIV/AIDS and Cancer will still not have cures, but we will be closer to solving their riddles.

4. Monkey’s, apes, Orangutans, and Chimpanzee’s will not escape secret laboratories and take over the world.

5. CERN will be unable to verify the Higgs principle, thus leaving physicists scrambling to try and bullsh!t their way around the lack of evidence.

6. Dark energy will remain in the dark, with us having little evidence of it’s existence.

7. Despite the lack of evidence, scientists will continue to say that Dark Energy exists instead of trying to maybe think and say, ‘well maybe our base principles are a bit off’ and find the reality around us.

8. New fossil evidence will show that the origins and evolution of man is more convoluted and less linear than expected.

9. The Republican Right will continue to set science back decades as they literally preach to Americans about God, Christianity, and the evils of knowledge and Science.

10. On December 22, 2012 most of us will wake up to a normal world and our normal lives and all those dimwits who are hiding underground or in caves expecting the end of days or rapture or armaggedon will look absolutely stupid and the people they believed will have a whole lotta ‘splaining to do!!!