The Protons Are Back in Town

By Sean Carroll | April 2, 2012 9:43 am

Zooming around the LHC, colliding at unprecedentedly high energies: 8 trillion electron volts total, in comparison with last year’s 7 TeV. The ultimate goal is to reach an amazing 14 TeV, although that won’t happen soon — the plan is to shut down for quite a while after the end of this year’s run, tighten the gaskets and so forth, and then resume the march to higher and higher energies.

This year’s run is all about luminosity, i.e. getting as many collisions in the can as they can. Last year they reached about 5 inverse femtobarns, while this year they’re shooting for 15 inverse femtobarns. Yes, those are the goofiest units in all of physics. Think of it this way: imagine the protons entering a detector are shooting at a tiny target with some fixed size, measured in units of area. Then we can measure the luminosity by counting the number of protons passing through that area in a fixed moment of time: i.e., the number of protons per square centimeter per second. That’s at any one moment; if we integrate up over the course of a year, the “per second” disappears and leaves us with the total number of protons that have passed through the target area, i.e. a certain number of protons per square centimeter. But that number would be enormously huge, so rather than using square centimeters, particle physicists like to use “barns,” defined as 10-24 cm2. (Broad side of a barn, get it?) But even measuring the luminosity in inverse barns would be really big, so they go for inverse femtobarns (1 fb = 10-39 cm2). Long story short: 10 inverse femtobarns is equivalent to 1040 protons passing through a 1 cm target area. (That’s much larger than the number of collisions — to get the number of collisions for any particular process, you need to multiply by the cross-section for that process, which is often quite tiny. That’s why particle physics is hard! Still, there will be a buttload of collisions.)

Anyway, I’m pretty sure the LHC is back to colliding protons after this year’s winter shutdown, and they’re smashing together at 8 TeV. But to be honest my only hard evidence is from Twitter, where the ATLAS collaboration has tweeted this image.

Meanwhile, results are still coming out from last year’s run. Sadly, they’re doing a great job at constraining possible new physics, but no convincing discoveries as yet. Here’s a recent result from LHCb, the experiment that looks at decays of mesons containing b quarks. This plot is from David Straub, from a talk at Moriond, based on this paper.

Horizontal axis is the fraction of time (the branching ratio) bottom/strange mesons decay into two muons, while the vertical axis is the fraction of time bottom/down mesons do the same thing. These numbers have specific predictions within the good old Standard Model, but it’s very easy for new physics such as supersymmetry to enhance the numbers quite a bit. LHCb has put an upper limit on both quantities, which rules out all the gray area of the plot, leaving only the colorful part at the bottom left. The colors correspond to possible predictions in different versions of supersymmetry. As you see, it would have been very easy to have detected a substantial deviation from the Standard Model by now, but no such luck. This doesn’t mean some other version of supersymmetry isn’t right, just that we’ll have to try harder. No question that a proper update of our likelihood functions will have to decrease the chance that we expect fo find SUSY at the LHC compared to what we would have thought a few years ago, however. This is why the march to higher energies will be so important.

If you want to ask some detailed questions about the accelerator and the experiment, the CMS and ATLAS collaborations are having a Google+ hangout this Wednesday that you are welcome to join. It starts at 7 am Los Angeles time, so I’m unlikely to make it, but let us know if anyone here participates.

  • Don Denesiuk

    And the LHC, CMS and Atlas will be holding a Google Plus On Air Hangout (anyone can watch) to celebrate the start of the 2012 science data taking season.
    ” The Hangout will be streamed live on the +CMS Experiment page.
    Date: 4th April, 2012 (Wednesday)
    Time: 16:00 – 17:30 Central European Summer Time (UTC +2) | Start times around the world:

  • cormac

    I find the inverse femtobarn unit pretty counter-intuitive.
    When I was a student, we used to talk about flux, the number of particles passing unit area in unit time. So flux summed over some time interval would obviously have the units of inverse area. Then someone introduced a ‘standard area’ of 10-26 cm2 and dropped the word flux – and the connection with undergraduate science was lost forever!

  • Jeff

    Whenever I hear about the LHC reaching these unprecedented energies, I pine for the Superconducting Super Collider, which would have reached a collision energy of 40 TeV, making the LHC look like a cathode ray tube by comparison. As LHC work proceeds, we’ll plumb the depths of the folly of abandoning the SSC.

  • dcwarrior

    cormac – did you invent a capacitor to store the flux? If so, please contact Dr. Emmett Brown.

  • James

    Sean, what’s your feeling regarding the prospects for new physics (with a particular mind to SUSY etc) at the LHC? Nature has been very kind to us over the last 50 years, giving us a fantastic stream of new experimental findings to keep us busy, but it’s been a while since an accelerator has really thrown up something new and exciting. We all hoped the LHC would provide all sorts of surprises, but so far it hasn’t been very obliging. The new SUSY limits are really putting the squeeze on and it’s starting to get a little uncomfortable.
    So how worried are you about what some people think is the nightmare scenario – an SM Higgs and nothing else? (I wouldn’t call it a nightmare myself; it would still be a great achievement, but it would definitely be underwhelming). Much as I’d like to believe nature is the gift that keeps on giving, there’s really no reason why we should continue to be so lucky.

  • Sean Carroll

    I think finding the Higgs and nothing else is unlikely, but certainly possible, and it would be triumphant but kind of nightmarish for the future of the field. The reason to expect something beyond the Higgs isn’t just that Nature has been kind; it’s that the electroweak scale is a natural place to look for new physics. But it’s still early days, and the machine isn’t running at full power, so no need to get nervous quite yet.

  • marcel

    Still, there will be a buttload of collisions.

    What’s with the English units of measurement in a scientific blog?

  • Paul

    #7: he may have meant a metric buttload.

  • marcel

    #8: I don’t think so. The colloquial term for that is a s**tload, and I’m sure he’d have said that if that’s what he’d meant.

  • David Galiel

    “Inverse Femtobarns” is the name of my new Talking Heads cover band.

  • Robert Wolfson

    Well, if we’re naming rock bands (to which I don’t listen anyway, since I’m VERY old-fashioned, I have three candidate names:




    Feel free to use any of them. Just give me credit.


  • Pingback: Die irre Saga der rasenden Neutrinos ist … vorbei! « Skyweek Zwei Punkt Null()


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Cosmic Variance

Random samplings from a universe of ideas.

About Sean Carroll

Sean Carroll is a Senior Research Associate in the Department of Physics at the California Institute of Technology. His research interests include theoretical aspects of cosmology, field theory, and gravitation. His most recent book is The Particle at the End of the Universe, about the Large Hadron Collider and the search for the Higgs boson. Here are some of his favorite blog posts, home page, and email: carroll [at] .


See More

Collapse bottom bar