ICHEP 2012 – Higgs Session

By Mark Trodden | July 9, 2012 10:22 pm

As you may have seen from our live-blogging of the CERN seminars on Wednesday morning, after having told Sean and John I would be asleep, I woke up anyway and watched the announcement live at 3am my time. I don’t regret it for a moment – you don’t get to watch historic events like that every day! But the reason I’d originally intended to stay asleep was that I had a very long day ahead of me, since Wednesday evening I flew out to Melbourne to take part in the 36th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP). This is the major high-energy physics conference every two years; and this year, given the Higgs announcement, it is particularly exciting.

I landed in Melbourne on Friday morning (local time), but couldn’t attend a lot of the conference that day because I had to deal with a lost bag (thanks United!) and then shop for a shirt, underwear, etc. Enough about that though. For the last year or so the University of Melbourne has been the primary institution in a new Australian Center of Excellence in Particle Physics (CoEPP) at the Terascale, and I am fortunate to be one of their international partner investigators and on the International Advisory Committee. Friday evening there was a small reception and dinner for members of the Center and the IAC. Geoff Taylor (head of CoEpp), my friend Ray Volkas, Rolf Heuer (Director General of CERN and Chair of the IAC), and others were all there, dressed nicely in their suits. And I was there in the jeans I’d worn continually (and slept in on the plane) for two and a half days (thanks United! OK, I’ll stop mentioning it now). In any case, this was a lovely start to what I”m hoping will be one of the more exciting conferences of my career.

Saturday was a day filled with parallel sessions. I gave a short talk on Galileons in the Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology session that afternoon, but due to jet lag I can’t recall in any detail the other talks that I went to, except for a nice one by Stefan Antusch on Matter Inflation. Sunday was a day off for most of us, which allowed me to work on the plenary talk on Dark Energy and Cosmology that I will deliver on Wednesday, and spend some time enjoying some of the wonderful attractions of Melbourne that I know from my previous visits.

Then, on Monday, the plenary talks began. I was up early to sit on a press panel at 8am, but afterwards went straight to the auditorium, and after a nice introduction from Geoff Taylor and a number of others, the Higgs session started up. Although Fabiola Gianotti, who you may have seen in the Wednesday presentations, is here, this time the talk on ATLAS Higgs Searches and Experiment was given by Richard Hawkings from CERN. He covered the preliminary results that generated excitement at the end of last year, but quickly moved on to the 2012 results. One thing he emphasized is that all their decisions about how to select events and what analysis techniques to use were fixed before looking at the 2012 data. This is something I think is often missed in causal explanations of how these things work. You can’t come along after the fact and design analyses to optimize the chance of claiming a discovery – that could introduce bias too easily.

Hawkings discussed the two most important channels at this point separately. In the first, in which the Higgs decays to two photons, ATLAS finds a new particle at a mass of 126.5GeV with a significance of 4.5 sigma after allowing for systematic uncertainties in the photon energy. He mentioned that the signal strength is somewhat higher than expected from the Standard Model, but still compatible with it. In the second channel, in which the Higgs decays to four leptons via two Z bosons, a similar set of results yield a new particle at mass 125GeV.

Finally for ATLAS, the combined 2011 and 2012 results from both these channels yield “Evidence for a new, narrow resonance at a mass near 126.5GeV” at a significance, after taking account energy systematics, of 5.0 sigma. It was wonderful (and I felt extremely privileged) to be in a room full of other physicists watching this. This is the first conference at which we know that (to all intents and purposes) we have a Higgs. It must have been even more fun at CERN on Wednesday Sean!

Next up was Joe Incandela from UCSB, of Internet fame from Wednesday’s CERN seminar, to report on “Observation of a narrow resonance near 125GeV in CMS”. This talk was a little slower, with more focus on the challenges that pile-up presented. He pointed out that they have learned a lot and are now processing events in under 20 seconds. Incandela presented results for five decay modes for this conference, but again, the two I mentioned above for ATLAS are the most sensitive right now to the Higgs. As with ATLAS , the final result was evidence for a new particle at 125GeV at 5.0 sigma significance. The combined results of all channels show a signal only a little more than 1 sigma away from the Standard Model prediction, and so, so far, one can’t see other new physics.

The final Higgs talk was about the Tevatron results by Shalhout Shalhout, who is a postdoc at UC Davis. One big difference here is that the most important process is Higgs decaying to two b-quarks. In their new analysis for ICHEP their combined results show an excess with a significance of 2.5 sigma, compatible with Standard Model Higgs production in the range 115GeV – 135GeV.

There is a lot more going on at this conference of course, and I’ll write a few more times, but I really wanted this to be just about the Higgs. Being here was a lot different from watching alone in bed at 3am. It has been a great week for particle physics!

sciseekclaimtoken-4ffc8eab85e5c

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Higgs, Science, Top Posts, Travel
  • Meh

    If you get a chance, you MUST try out the Sichuan Chinese there in Melbourne. I swear, it’s better than Sichuan China.

    Man, I wish I was there. Enjoy and keep us posted.

    I think what’s really interesting here is that we are seeing some definite deviations from a rigid standard model Higgs, however slight they may be.

  • citrine

    Thanks for sharing the excitement of this event with us!!

    My FIRST axiom of airplane travel – anything not directly in one’s possession will be misplaced by the airline.

    My generalized SECOND axiom of travel – one’s purse/ wallet will go missing.
    [ Thus e-mail all ID no.s of credit cards, etc. + PowerPoint slides to yourself before traveling.]

  • http://arxiv.org/find/math/1/au:+Crowley_S/0/1/0/all/0/1 Stephen Crowley

    Can you please explain a little more what it means for an event to be processed in 20 seconds in CMS? Also, I’m curious what the scientists are doing during various beam modes and events in the logbook at https://lblogbook.cern.ch/shift/ . Are they usually looking at outputs on display devices usually? If so, doesn’t this bias them towards a “device centric” outlook or otherwise have some unknown consequences?

  • Sili

    Richard Hawkings from CERN

    Poor Guy. He must be getting so much misdirected hatemail with that name.

  • John

    We get it, you traveled really really far, lost luggage, suffered jet lag etc. Why are physicists gathering in Australia to discuss matters that are happening on the other side of the world? Why are taxpayer-funded agencies paying for these junkets?

  • Archie Pelago

    “Why are taxpayer-funded agencies paying for these junkets?”

    If you knew Melbourne and its very exiguous “attractions” you would realise that this “junket” is a form of penal servitude.

  • https://plus.google.com/113074217492996610246/posts Mark Trodden

    John #5: I hope you get it – I wrote it in pretty plain English.

    Trying to look past your attitude, here’s a serious answer. Science is extremely international. For a conference like this, wherever you hold it you’re going to be bringing a lot of people from elsewhere. Fortunately for us in the US, there is no advantage to holding the conference at, for example, CERN, otherwise we’d always have to travel there and Europeans would pay a lot less to travel than we would. Instead, the conference moves around, spreading the costs of hosting, costs and burdens of travel among the international community. Four years ago ICHEP was in Philadelphia (really cheap for me), two years ago in Paris. This is actually, I believe, the first time the ICHEP conference has been held south of the equator.

    It’s called international collaboration, not a junket. Taxpayer funded agencies fund them (in part) because scientists, and the extensive oversight processes we go through to get and spend grants, deem them to be good use of some of the money, and important to making progress in the field.

  • Roberto

    Stephen #3: 20s is the average time for the “reconstruction” of an event, the process that takes “raw” data (the bits encoding the response of all the channels of the detectors) and transforms it in list of tracks, jets etc. This is done only once per event, or maybe twice when more refined calibrations for the detector response are computed. Once reconstructed, the events are ready to be analyzed by the many physicists of the collaboration to look for specific properties (e.g. the search for the Higgs). The reconstruction time depends heavily on the complexity of the event, in particular on the level of pile-up, and the value quoted refers to a pile-up between 25 and 30.
    I don’t understand the second question. During data taking, the scientists in the control room are certainly not looking to the display of each event (would be a challenge, with many hundreds of events written every second). They are just checking that the many detectors are working correctly, storing high quality data.

  • Roman

    Roberto – I have a similar question – how do you calibrate the channels of the detector?
    I imagine some sort of supernova event, standard candle that you know everything about so energies, tracks and other forms of raw data can be properly assigned to the events you don’t know much about.

  • Pingback: Trotz des neuen Bosons: warum die eigentlichen Entdeckungen – hoffentlich – erst noch kommen « Skyweek Zwei Punkt Null

  • Roberto

    Roman #9, this is a very interesting question, but impossible to be answered in few lines. The big LHC experiments are made of many detectors (trackers, calorimeters, muon detectors..) each with its own calibration necessities. One of the most important to be calibrated is the electromagnetic calorimeter which measures the energy of the electrons (together with the tracker), and that of the photons. Remember that Higgs–>two photons is the main discovery channel. Important are the absolute calibration (energy scale) and the inter-calibration of the almost 80 thousands crystals. The detector was calibrated with radiative sources and test beams during construction, it is constantly monitored with multiple laser pulse systems to track drifts caused by radiation damage, and as you say it is kept calibrated using “standard candles” like Z->e+e-, neutral pions and eta decaying into two photons etc.

  • John

    Mark #7:

    I appreciate the internationalism of scientific collaboration, but this in itself doesn’t justify having conferences in locations that are nowhere near the center of gravity of the collaborators.

    Extensive travel budgets are a perk of being a

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
ADVERTISEMENT

DISCOVER's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Cosmic Variance

Random samplings from a universe of ideas.

About Mark Trodden

Mark Trodden holds the Fay R. and Eugene L. Langberg Endowed Chair in Physics and is co-director of the Center for Particle Cosmology at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a theoretical physicist working on particle physics and gravity— in particular on the roles they play in the evolution and structure of the universe. When asked for a short phrase to describe his research area, he says he is a particle cosmologist.

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »