Older Dads Give Good Telomeres, But Longevity? Not So Much

By Sophie Bushwick | August 2, 2012 11:23 am

Sophie Bushwick (Twitter, Tumblr) is a science journalist and podcaster, and is currently an intern at DISCOVERmagazine.com. She has written for Scientific American, io9, and DISCOVER, and has produced podcasts for 60-Second Science and Physics Central

Human chromosomes (grey) capped by telomeres (white)
U.S. Department of Energy Human Genome Program

Renowned biologist Elizabeth Blackburn has said that when she was a young post-doc, “Telomeres just grabbed me and kept leading me on.” And lead her on they did—all the way to the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2009. Telomeres are DNA sequences that continue to fascinate researchers and the public, partially because people with longer telomeres tend to live longer. So the recent finding that older men father offspring with unusually lengthy telomeres sounds like great news. Men of advanced age will give their children the gift of longer lives—right? But as is so often the case in biology, things aren’t that simple, and having an old father may not be an easy route to a long and healthy life.

Every time a piece of DNA gets copied, it can end up with errors in its sequence, or mutations. One of the most frequent changes is losing scraps of information from each end of the strand. Luckily, these strands are capped with telomeres, repeating sequences that do not code for any proteins and serve only to protect the rest of the DNA. Each time the DNA makes a copy, its telomeres get shorter, until these protective ends wear away to nothing. Without telomeres, the DNA cannot make any more copies, and the cell containing it will die.

But sperm are not subject to this telomere-shortening effect. In fact, the telomeres in sperm-producing stem cells not only resist degrading, they actually grow. This may be thanks to a high concentration of the telomere-repairing enzyme telomerase in the testicles; researchers are still uncertain. All they know is that the older the man, the longer the telomeres in his sperm will be.

And a recent study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that these long telomeres can be passed down to offspring: The children of older fathers are born with longer telomeres in all their cells. In fact, the long telomeres can carry over for two generations, with older paternal grandfathers passing their long telomeres to both their children and their sons’ children. The longest telomeres of all went to children whose fathers and fathers’ fathers had reproduced at advanced ages. (But daughters of older fathers didn’t pass on the extra-long telomeres at all.)

Getting longer telomeres is exciting because telomere length is associated with longevity. A telomere that shrinks with each cell division is like a ticking clock counting down the cell’s life; when a father passes longer telomeres to his offspring, he’s essentially giving their cellular clocks more ticks. So children of older fathers should live longer! There’s just one problem: they don’t.

Some [pdf] studies [pdf] of historical data on longevity have found that older fathers, particularly those who reproduce beyond the age of 65, are actually associated with a shorter lifespan for their children, especially their daughters. Middle-aged offspring of men in the oldest age group were 60 percent more likely to die than the progeny of younger men. The children of older dads are also more likely to have lower IQs and suffer from leukemia, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and autism. Why aren’t the longer telomeres granting them longer, better lives?

Telomere structure | Iridos/Wikipedia

The issue is that sperm cells aren’t only gaining telomere length—they’re also picking up more mutations. Unlike women, whose eggs are generally created all at once, while a female is still in utero, men produce sperm throughout their lives. And every time a sperm stem cell begins the process of spawning new sperm, it has to divide, creating the opportunity for mutations to form. The sperm produced by older sperm stem cells will have longer telomeres, but they will also have a greater load of mutations, which tends to shorten offspring lifespan.

So the question is: Between telomere length and mutation load, which one dominates the offspring’s chances of a long life? Because studies of historical data found that offspring of older fathers die earlier, you might think that the mutation load wins. But this may not be entirely correct. First of all, fathers’ ages are far from the only contributors to their offspring’s health. For example, data for these longevity studies was collected in the 1800s and 1900s, before reliable birth control. Fathers often had many children before middle age, which means the offspring of older fathers were likely to have many siblings. The tenth child of an older father would receive less attention, fewer resources, and perhaps less of an opportunity for long life than, say, an only child born today whose parents chose to wait a while before reproducing. Social factors and available resources play a big part in a child’s lifespan.

In contrast with the studies that used historical data, a 2009 study of modern elderly Canadians found no connection between the seniors’ likelihood of dying and their parents’ ages. However, this study only looked at the offspring of men between the ages of 25 and 45. It may be that the adverse effect of genetic mutations on offspring longevity only becomes important for men over a certain age. After all, one of the historical studies found the effect to be much more significant in the oldest age group: men who reproduced after the age of 65. This suggests there may be a sweet spot, a paternal age that maximizes telomere length while minimizing mutations, that would be an ideal time for reproduction—at least, in terms of genetic quality.

But even if there is a slight advantage to having middle-aged but not old fathers, it’s not likely to be a big advantage, or we would see some positive effect in longevity data. Ultimately, telomeres and mutations don’t determine exactly how or when we die. These genetic factors shape our lives, but they don’t control our destinies.


  • jean

    My father had me at 62, I dont have any major genetic defects that I know of except that I’m a bit near-sighted and I may possibly have ADD, and I’ve always been above average in my class early in school and colleage. And my frends and family have always commented about how I look years yonger than I really am. Im 25yo and often mistaken for 18 or even 15. Could this be asociated with my telometer lenght?

  • KK

    So you will “live longer”, but have less insight into proper spelling and grammar ?

  • Rick

    I think you are looking at this a little wrong. I I think it means if you dad and grandfather were around mid 30s when they reproduced then that might be beneficial because your dna hasn’t yet deteriorated to to point of detriment of offspring. Now if your dad is around 60 then it will be more likely be not beneficial thanks to deteriorated genetic passing. I I think there is a cutoff point where it is beneficial and where it is not. I that point may be mid 30s early 40s.

  • jasmie young

    Hi I’m a female and my mom had me at 23 my dad 47 I look very young. For my age. I’m 35 but have been told. That I look like I’m in my 20’s Im good at fixing things and solving puzzles I feel like I’m 16 my daughter is 15. When we are out people think we are friends is this be cause of my dad or because my mom was so young. So was it fresh eggs or aged sperm?

  • James Stanley

    Still not really true, though. The oldest people, most of the time, seem to be born to parents who are BOTH under 30. Just look at Ancel Keys – born to teenage parents, lived to 100.

  • Azi Smythe

    Every comment thus far has grossly confused population with individual statistics…..one does not follow the other!

  • Stephanie Michelle Montgomery-

    I think that, even though your circumstances might be different, what they are saying is over a certain age, the majority of data shows that a person’s life expectancy (especially a female) shortens if a man procreate older in life, like over 60, since sperm deteriorates over a certain age. It showed that between 25 and 45, this wasn’t an issue. Also, older men tend to pass on a lot more birth defects since their sperm deteriorates. While you might have been born with no birth defects or have a higher than average IQ from and your Dad was older, the average people with older Daddies obviously aren’t always so lucky. So then we can generalize it’s probably best to procreate when sperms are more vital and not with an old dad.

  • Howitzers

    Reading these comments, I’ve concluded that Discover’s current subtitle of “Science for the curious” should be revised to “Science for those that do not comprehend science (and thoroughly detest using language with proper grammar or syntax)”.
    It’s a little long, but it’s catchy, no?

  • Sinisa Maricic

    My great grandfather had his children while in his 60es and70es. His 2 daughters lived almost 100 and his son (my grandad) 80 but suffered 2 time wounds in ww2. Excuse my grammar, English is 5th language I speak.

  • primetime2123

    men can have kids in their 50s without having any genetic defects as long as the mother is young.


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


See More

Collapse bottom bar