At least as important, if not more so, is that there is still a plurality, if not a majority, who actually believe that answers to questions they ask of candidates are truthful. There are no Democratic voters who can trutfully say their candidate ever answered more than half their wants. And none of them can state their candidate held true even to what few promises they appeared to pursue. Republican voters are never truly dissatisfied because many if not most tend to make enough that they buy their “rights”, they don’t need an untrustworthy politician to promise them anything. What’s more, in the recent past, Democrats have been almost more Republican than Republicans.

Basically, about the only question that really matters, that is true for any candidate, is, “What do you intend to blame to explain away breaking your promises to ‘rank and file’ constituents?”

As an aside, notice the illustration at the top of the article, the insistence on peppering it with tiny squares like pixels. The paszt decade or more has seen an emphasis on subliminal graphic representations, obvios by occurring where they have no place. The arcing shape often called a “swoosh” has been seen in logos, for example, from Vytorin, Dulcolax, Ryder trucks, Sunbeam appliances, Hilton Hotels, Vitacost, MSP, Evex, Gateway Energy Services, Pace, WorldNet, Presentation Media, Inc. Even Good Housekeeping altered its seal to reesemble a “swoosh”.

In keeping with the universal introduction of digtal pixellation into braodcasting, emphasis has been placed on representing scenes broken into blocks. Commercials for Starkist Tuna, Kleenex, Simply Saline, Raymor & Flanagan, Jos. A. Bank, the lead in for “$#*!” My Dad Says”, ads for “Touch”, “New Year’s Eve” and “Person of Interest”, the backdrops for The Ellen DeGeneres Show, Dr. Oz, Dr. Drew, “Insider”, the banner for “UFO Iconoclast”, and, now, the illustration in this article. Subliminal imagery abounds, the majority of graphical presentation fitting into only a few categories.