<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Colossal Pile of Jibberish Behind Discovery, and Its Implications for Science Funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2012/11/14/the-colossal-pile-of-jibberish-behind-discovery-and-its-implications-for-science-funding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2012/11/14/the-colossal-pile-of-jibberish-behind-discovery-and-its-implications-for-science-funding/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Davis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2012/11/14/the-colossal-pile-of-jibberish-behind-discovery-and-its-implications-for-science-funding/#comment-2392</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/?p=2536#comment-2392</guid>
		<description>&quot;The result is that how we scientists find our ideas is ugly, and frankly embarrassing to show folks. That’s why we don’t put this part of the process into our journal articles or books.&quot;

That part has always bothered me too - that there is never any promotion of publicizing the process of messy, fortuitous discoveries.  There&#039;s got to be some middle ground between cataloging every stray thought and the &quot;Here is the hypothesis and ideas we had planned out all along *winkwink*&quot; that frames every science paper.  Even if just an encouraging attitude in the publication process for researchers to say &quot;hey, this set of data was the result of a really happy accident&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The result is that how we scientists find our ideas is ugly, and frankly embarrassing to show folks. That’s why we don’t put this part of the process into our journal articles or books.&#8221;</p>
<p>That part has always bothered me too &#8211; that there is never any promotion of publicizing the process of messy, fortuitous discoveries.  There&#8217;s got to be some middle ground between cataloging every stray thought and the &#8220;Here is the hypothesis and ideas we had planned out all along *winkwink*&#8221; that frames every science paper.  Even if just an encouraging attitude in the publication process for researchers to say &#8220;hey, this set of data was the result of a really happy accident&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chorasimilarity</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2012/11/14/the-colossal-pile-of-jibberish-behind-discovery-and-its-implications-for-science-funding/#comment-2391</link>
		<dc:creator>chorasimilarity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/?p=2536#comment-2391</guid>
		<description>Commented on this, with two examples of my own, here:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://chorasimilarity.wordpress.com/2012/11/20/scattered-thoughts-about-creativity/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Scattered thoughts about creativity&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commented on this, with two examples of my own, here:<br />
<a href="http://chorasimilarity.wordpress.com/2012/11/20/scattered-thoughts-about-creativity/" rel="nofollow">Scattered thoughts about creativity</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Al</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2012/11/14/the-colossal-pile-of-jibberish-behind-discovery-and-its-implications-for-science-funding/#comment-2389</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/?p=2536#comment-2389</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;I&gt;You see, there is no uniformly sound advice on where to get good ideas.&lt;/I&gt;  &lt;B&gt;The 40 Principles of TRIZ&lt;/B&gt;, the theory of invention re Genrich Altshuller.  That is how you do it  Nothing that can succeed successfully resists TRIZ.  Organic synthesis has &quot;Umpolung&quot; (&quot;do it the other way&quot;).   Question authority.  All the fun is in the footnotes (e.g, the Mpemba effect. Erasto Mpemba was 13, making ice cream).

[1.1.1]-propellane was synthesized by a grad student so green he dripped sap.  [1.1.2]-propellane is a  photochemical transient in cryogenic frozen  gas matrix (ring strain).  As a joke they gave him the procedure for large ring propellanes - wet chemistry on a bench top.  He substituted the appropriate starting material, and it worked in rather high yield.  Symmetry of the product affords it no easy path to decomposition.

Taking a lazy hot shower while not thinking about elephants also works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>You see, there is no uniformly sound advice on where to get good ideas.</i>  <b>The 40 Principles of TRIZ</b>, the theory of invention re Genrich Altshuller.  That is how you do it  Nothing that can succeed successfully resists TRIZ.  Organic synthesis has &#8220;Umpolung&#8221; (&#8220;do it the other way&#8221;).   Question authority.  All the fun is in the footnotes (e.g, the Mpemba effect. Erasto Mpemba was 13, making ice cream).</p>
<p>[1.1.1]-propellane was synthesized by a grad student so green he dripped sap.  [1.1.2]-propellane is a  photochemical transient in cryogenic frozen  gas matrix (ring strain).  As a joke they gave him the procedure for large ring propellanes &#8211; wet chemistry on a bench top.  He substituted the appropriate starting material, and it worked in rather high yield.  Symmetry of the product affords it no easy path to decomposition.</p>
<p>Taking a lazy hot shower while not thinking about elephants also works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT Sturgell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2012/11/14/the-colossal-pile-of-jibberish-behind-discovery-and-its-implications-for-science-funding/#comment-2388</link>
		<dc:creator>JT Sturgell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/?p=2536#comment-2388</guid>
		<description>Amazing how the creative process for science and advertising is so similar. Except advertisers get paid to think up jibberish to sell more cars. Full disclosure: By day I&#039;m a creative director, evenings and weekends I volunteer for a bottlenose dolphin research project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing how the creative process for science and advertising is so similar. Except advertisers get paid to think up jibberish to sell more cars. Full disclosure: By day I&#8217;m a creative director, evenings and weekends I volunteer for a bottlenose dolphin research project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Currie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2012/11/14/the-colossal-pile-of-jibberish-behind-discovery-and-its-implications-for-science-funding/#comment-2384</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Currie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/?p=2536#comment-2384</guid>
		<description>This is a Colossal Pile of Fabulous

You are now on my must read list

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a Colossal Pile of Fabulous</p>
<p>You are now on my must read list</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
