How We Discovered the Black Hole at the Center of Our Galaxy

By Erika K. Carlson | July 26, 2018 7:00 am
Image of the area surrounding the Milky Way galaxy's center in X-rays

An image of the area surrounding Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way galaxy, in X-ray and infrared light. (Credit: X-ray: NASA/UMass/D.Wang et al., IR: NASA/STScI)

On Thursday, astronomers announced the first observations of the effect of a black hole’s gravitational redshift — light coming from a star in the gravitational field near a black hole looked redder than it would’ve outside the black hole’s influence.

The black hole responsible was Sagittarius A* (pronounced “Sagittarius A-star”), the supermassive black hole at the center of our Milky Way galaxy. Astronomers think that most large galaxies like the Milky Way should have supermassive black holes in their centers, but it wasn’t until the past couple decades that they had compelling evidence that Sgr A* is our supermassive black hole.

The discovery of Sgr A* is credited to two astronomers, Bruce Balick and Robert L. Brown, who published a paper in 1974 describing a bright radio source in a small region at the very center of the Milky Way.

Astronomers had known for a while that there were a lot of radio waves coming from near the Milky Way’s center. Karl G. Jansky, a physicist working for Bell Telephone Laboratories, was trying to identify sources of static the telephone company might have to deal with when he stumbled upon the discovery in the early 1930s. Jansky wanted to investigate further to find out why radio waves were coming from interstellar space, but Bell Labs was not interested, and no one else followed up on the discovery for several years.

Even though the radio source was discovered in 1974, the name Sgr A* didn’t come around until 1982. Astronomers had proposed a couple other names, like GCCRS (for Galactic Center Compact Radio Source), but they didn’t catch on. Brown proposed the name Sagittarius A* because the source was inside a larger radio-emitting structure called Sagittarius A. The asterisk notation was used in atomic physics for atoms that are in a high-energy state, and Brown thought this would be a good analogy for the compact radio source giving energy to its surroundings.

Artist's impression of stars orbiting the supermassive black hole Sagittarius A*

Artist’s impression of stars orbiting very close to Sagittarius A*, here represented as a small blue circle. (Credit:
ESO/M. Parsa/L. Calçada)

It’s a Black Hole, Alright

It was observations in the early 2000s of the closest stars orbiting Sgr A*, like the gravitationally redshifted star S2, that gave astronomers really convincing evidence that Sgr A* contains a supermassive black hole. Based on the stars’ orbits, astronomers calculated that roughly 4 million times the mass of the sun had to be contained within a region much smaller than the size of our solar system. They realized that whatever was at the heart of Sgr A* was too dense to be anything but a black hole.

Improving telescope technology will let astronomers make out finer details in areas of space surrounding supermassive black holes. The Event Horizon Telescope, a collaboration of telescopes across the globe working together, has recently observed the immediate neighborhood of Sgr A*. The Event Horizon Telescope team is expected to reveal the results of these observations soon. Stay tuned!

  • OWilson

    Galaxies are clasical vortexes, like whirlpools, the solar system, hurricanes, and even the kitechen sink!

    In fact vortexes are the very essence of the universe.

    Common sense, aside from Einstein’s predictions, infers that something major is going on at the centre of these whirlpools, and black holes fill the bill nicely.

    But what happens in a black hole, in turn, defies all common sense! Where does the matter go, and why don’t we see more evidence of their voracious growth as they consume everything around them? There seems to be no evidence of a “tipping point” that eats up an entire galaxy!

    They seem relatively well behaved. :)

  • Deplorablewinner

    Electromagnetism is 39,000,000,etc etc (10 to the 39th) times more powerful than gravity. Nuf said. (Think primer field)


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


See More

Collapse bottom bar