Alien Space Rock ‘Oumuamua Just Keeps Getting Weirder

By Alison Klesman | November 8, 2018 5:02 pm

Last year, astronomers announced they’d detected a comet from another solar system: ‘Oumuamua. (Credit: NASA/ESA/STScI)

On October 19, 2017, astronomers first saw an object from another solar system traveling through our own. Zipping into our solar system from above, the interloper, now known as 1I/2017 U1 (‘Oumuamua), swung around the Sun and shot away again, never to return once it leaves our neck of the woods for interstellar space once more.

What have we learned about this mysterious visitor?

‘Oumuamua’s Path

Astronomers were able to record data on ‘Oumuamua (which means “scout” or “messenger” in Hawaiian) for only a brief period of time, although it’s been in our solar system for over a century. “It came into the solar system, inside 1,000 AU, around 1837 or so,” says Karen Meech of the Institute for Astronomy at the University of Hawaii. (1 AU, or astronomical unit, is equivalent to the average Earth-Sun distance of 93 million miles [150 million kilometers]). But ‘Oumuamua wasn’t spotted until last year because it was too far from the Sun to reflect enough light for astronomers to pick it up, even with today’s best telescopes. And once it got close enough to the Sun, it was moving fast, remaining for very little time in the relatively small region where it is visible to modern-day telescopes.

After it sped around the Sun, ‘Oumuamua was again on its way out, growing ever fainter. “Our very last observations from Hubble were January 2nd of 2018 at fainter than magnitude 27,” says Meech. “By May 3rd, it was again outside of Jupiter’s orbit. And … once it gets beyond about 1.2 AU or so, it’s 25th magnitude, so beyond Jupiter’s orbit, forget it. It’s gone.”

And while it may be gone from sight, it’s not yet gone from the solar system. According to Meech, ‘Oumuamua is expected to reach the Kuiper belt in about 2024, and pass the edge of the Kuiper belt in late 2025. It will pass the most distant location the Voyagers have reached, she says, in about 2038. By 2196, it will again be 1,000 AU from the Sun, although our Oort Cloud is projected to extend beyond 100,000 AU, so when ‘Oumuamua truly passes the “edge” of the solar system depends on where you define that edge.

Regardless, since January, ‘Oumuamua has been beyond astronomers’ reach. Now, they are working with what data they were able to gather over the course of just a few months to learn all they can about this strange interstellar interloper.

Speeding Up

At first, observers assumed ‘Oumuamua, which is about 2,600 feet (800 meters) long and about 260 feet (80 m) wide, was an asteroid. But in a June Nature paper led by Marco Micheli, astronomers (including Meech) reported that ‘Oumuamua was not moving as it should. Instead, it showed a “really strong non-gravitational acceleration,” Meech explains, which means its motion indicated that gravity was not the only thing dictating its path.

“There were a number of things that can cause acceleration in that direction,” she says. Her team investigated at least six of those things that could cause the acceleration, throwing out several along the way because they either required the object to be so very strange it wasn’t plausible (e.g., less dense than aerogel), or because the acceleration they produced didn’t match what was observed. The team ultimately concluded “the most likely one [was] comet outgassing, because we see that pretty often in comets.”

Outgassing is simply the process of gas and dust escaping from a comet as it nears the Sun and heats up, sublimating ices on the surface — turning them directly from a solid to a gas. As gas escapes, it gives the comet an extra push in the opposite direction, affecting its speed and rotation, giving it an extra push that deviates from gravitational effects. ‘Oumuamua’s motion “was the same level of strength as you would typically see comets,” says Meech. “So that didn’t seem unusual.”

What was unusual, she says, is that no dust was seen coming from the object. When gas escapes from a comet, it generally carries surface dust with it, and the stronger the outgassing, the larger the grains of dust it can liberate. That didn’t kill the comet theory, however — Meech says that even if the comet was devoid of small dust, large dust could have been coming off the surface and affecting its motion. And large dust is harder to see at visible wavelengths, where astronomers were looking.

So — no dust was seen escaping ‘Oumuamua, but what about gas? “We didn’t see any evidence of gas” either, says Meech. That was strange, because astronomers expected “a fair bit” of gas to be escaping to affect ‘Oumuamua’s motion in the way that was observed. The caveat here is that Meech’s team looked for CN gas, which, she says, is bright and easy to spot. “CN is usually dragged off the comets in our solar system when water comes out,” she says, so it can be used as a proxy for water, which is harder to observe. But down to their detection limit, “there was no CN at all seen. And that upper limit was strong enough that if there was that much water coming off, it says this comet’s also unusual, chemically.” After all, comets in our solar system can be pretty abundant in water.

“But again,” she adds, “it comes from another solar system, so maybe that’s not so surprising.”

‘Oumuamua’s Strange Reflections

How else is ‘Oumuamua strange? Astronomers used the Spitzer Space Telescope for over 30 hours of observations of ‘Oumuamua in the infrared — or rather, Meech says, they tried. “They detected nothing,” she says, when looking in the thermal infrared, which detects heat. “So it was just an upper limit.” But sometimes even non-detections can provide information. “From this, they said, ‘Okay, if it has thermal properties typical of comets, then it’s going to have to be brighter than everyone thought.’”

Reflectivity, or how much light an object reflects, can tell astronomers a lot about its shape, size, and composition. “We just always assumed [the reflectivity] was cometlike and very low,” Meech says. But “instead of the normal four percent reflectance, which is typical of comets, they were getting more like 10 percent reflectance. So that again isn’t quite matching a cometary body. The only way they could get it to agree with a four percent reflectance is if you assume it has very different thermal properties on its surface than normal comets. So again, a little bit peculiar,” she says.

Those same infrared observations also failed to see significant carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide outgassing from ‘Oumuamua. That’s important because Meech’s team had also looked at the possibility that it was spitting off those two gases, but in much higher quantities than is indicated by the limits set by the Spitzer observations.

“It’s always a little bit tricky to interpret too much out of not seeing something,” Meech cautions. But “yet again, it’s not quite hanging together as a typical comet.”

Where’s Home?

‘Oumuamua was born in another solar system, so perhaps all these oddities are normal for something that formed somewhere else. The next question then becomes, “Where did it form?”

“The whole point of getting HST time was to get the longest possible arc so that we could try to trace back where it came from,” says Meech. Coryn Bailer-Jones of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Heidelberg, Germany, calculated ‘Oumuamua’s track back to before it first entered the solar system, and compared that path to the past positions of 7 million stars measured by the Gaia satellite. Because stars are moving in the galaxy over time, he had to rewind their orbits, in addition to ‘Oumuamua’s, to look for places where the two might reasonably overlap.

He found four possible candidates that passed close enough to the rewound track of ‘Oumuamua’s motion that they might be its home. (By “close enough,” Meech says, Bailer-Jones was looking at stars ‘Oumuamua’s path had come within one to two Oort Cloud radii — 100,000 to 200,000 AU.)

But even here, all was not straightforward. “The only problem with these four candidates is that the encounter velocities were relatively high, between about 10 and 25 kilometers per second,” she says. “‘Oumuamua is probably an ejected planetesimal or building block from the birth process of planets, and it’s pretty hard to get ejection velocities this high during that birth process, just from a planetesimal getting too close to giant planets. We would have expected only a few kilometers per second. So these are high. It’s not impossible but it is pretty unlikely.”

It would be more likely, she says, if ‘Oumuamua came from a binary star system. But, of course, none of the four candidates found are known to be binary stars. The next Gaia data releases, she says, may help, allowing astronomers to trace back the motions of stars nearby even further in time, and possibly find a better candidate for ‘Oumuamua’s home. “It would be great to revisit this in a couple of years,” she says, when more data from Gaia is available.

An Ongoing Mystery

‘Oumuamua remains the first and (thus far) only interstellar visitor we’ve caught skipping through our solar system. The data available on it are limited, but that doesn’t stop researchers around the world from wondering what they can find within its depths. “What’s especially fascinating is that people are still writing papers on it,” says Meech, “even though we effectively got a couple weeks of data with everyone trying, and then the HST and the Spitzer data went a little longer, but that’s it. And people are still writing papers.”

What’s more, A recent TED talk Meech gave on ‘Oumuamua currently has more than 2 million views and is continuing to gain more, she says. “Clearly people are interested.”

It’s certainly an interesting object. Its strange properties have even prompted some to suggest it’s of truly alien — as in, alien-built — origin. But those arguments don’t really hold up against the data we do have, Meech says, limited though it may be.

So while it’s not an alien spaceship or an artificial light sail, ‘Oumuamua is still a mysterious, transient visitor that has captured the attention of researchers and the public alike.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Space & Physics, Top Posts
  • Uncle Al

    Nothing spontaneously large scale forms with a clean 10:1 aspect ratio, “2600 feet long and about 260 feet wide” re Cave of the Crystals (selenite, CaSO4·2H2O). That the thing is honking along but has a 7.5483 hr tumbling period demands large cumulative acceleration with no random components. “an ejected planetesimal” The elongated shape and its negligible tumbling remove that choice.

    arXiv:1712.00437, “hyperbolic excess speed of 26 km/s [16.16 mi/s]” A shaped charge squirts at 4.4 to 8.7 mi/s, acceleration ~25 million gees. Oumuamua mightily squirted out and solidified elongated. sure “The very large elongation together with the measured moderate rotation rate require a density of >1034 kg/m³ [a gram/cm³] to prevent the body from falling apart

    It’s a derelict starship. Our idiot bureaucracies declared a well-aimed derelict to be a nuisance not an opportunity.

    • Dan Elliott

      I love it. I wish it were so. But do we have the technological ability to have intercepted this thing with a probe even if we wanted to?

      • Bigo2

        No, you will not have the technology, but perhaps Russians and Chinese will…

    • SonEasterZombie

      Assuming this is true, Oumuamua isn’t scheduled to leave the influence of the solar system for more than a hundred years. There is plenty of time to catch up.

      • maxswickle

        soneasterzombie I do not agree

    • randomq

      An opportunity for facehuggers. But all you Weyland-Yutani types care about is profit…

    • Kurt S

      Seeing is you seem to be great at math. Could you give us the odds of it being artificial vs natural?

    • Marcelo Besser

      basalt columns

    • David Sbabo

      “clean 10:1”. DUH. We don’t even have a decent estimation of his size, just some ranges.

      It seems you are bad in science, could you educate yourself ?

      • Michael Lucas Monterey

        DS – On the other hand, Uncle AI seems to have a more mature approach than the countless scientistic conjecturists who know as little or less about the realities than him. Hmmm… Maybe Uncle’s “AI” refers to actual intelligence.

        • David Sbabo

          What are you talking about ? A big rock roaming in space was deflected by the biggest thing in the neighbourhood (aka our Sun). All we know about the rock is a range of estimates, a good esimation of his speed and a decent estimation of his rotation.

          How can ANYBODY with a MINIMAL understanding of science can CLAIM “It’s a derelict starship”. I can claim that Neptune is made of cheese with the same level of confidence.

    • Zg Programeri

      Imagine though that it is a meteorite/asteroid and it is the first of a million that we haven’t discovered yet that are travelling our way, undetectable, accelerated due to a supernova explosion, all irradiated and 26 km/s fast?

      • Michael Lucas Monterey

        Considering EM/magneto-dielectric plasma-field effects seems more useful than countless imaginary Shots in the Dark stuff, IMHO.

  • Dan Elliott

    If this was a comet leaving a trail of stuff behind, will the Earth pass through it?

    • Electronic Yogi

      Possibly. But the “stuff” will be so diluted by the distance and vastness of space that it would be undetectable by any means when it reach Earth.

      There is a scary theory though, that the Black Plague was brought to Earth by comets and their dusty tails. Not impossible, but they would have to pass very close and outgas enormous amounts of vapor for it to have any effect, even it was pure virus-steam.

      • Rick Bishop

        Wow! You guys are all truly awesome! I consider myself a rather analytical person. What I just read over the last several replies was captivating and I am reminded that imagination is more important than knowledge!

        • Electronic Yogi

          Not sure I understands your comment?

          If you are interested in weird theories that cannot be ruled out by science as we know it, you might be interested in the sci-fi novel The Black Cloud by Fred Hoyle. Its a fascinating story about how extraterrestrial intelligence could be. My recommendations.

          • Rick Bishop

            Thanks! I will read that. My comment was intended as a compliment. Reading your comments has given me some fresh perspectives!

          • Electronic Yogi

            Oh, ok. My pleasure.

          • Michael Lucas Monterey

            Muhammid once said, “Take wisdom from the mouth of a fool if you find it there.” I appreciate that. In the same vein, I appreciate some of the EU critiques of SM “cosmology” etc. I think you might also find much very useful there: Space News @ Youtube, re: the EM-magneto-dielctric plasma cosmology. The main thing they leave out is the possibility of 2 more octaves — of hyperplasma — not Dark energy/matter. As I said above, it would also be the subtle & very subtle level of form, structure & functionality that enables & sustains the generative principles of Life & proto-intelligence.

        • StickToFactsPls

          fully agree to Rick’s comment. Captivating and in that space strong logic and good knowledge combined with open minds certainly move us in the right direction … and we can call the extrapolations … imagination. Great reading you … and will also check the Black Cloud by Fred Hoyle.. thanks for the suggestion :)

          • Michael Lucas Monterey

            Cool. Will check out Black Cloud. Hoyle’s insight and intuition are under-rated. Not that I agree with him 100%.

      • Michael Lucas Monterey

        Not necessarily. If the “subfield”/hyperfield supports intrinsic intelligence/embodied information & generative formal-structural-functional principles, then the potential organization of evolutionary Life & biospheres is ubiquitous. Than, over billions of years, the new biomatrix of planetary life can begin & evolve with a minute initial insemination, or multiple infusions of the initiatory biochemicals, virions, etc. Rite? [sic]

  • Sasha F

    This is alien-build life panspermation parcel. Our life there in solar system started from one of these parcels arrived billions year ago.
    You don’t have to worry about possible contamination.
    First, outgassed seeds of life would take millions of years to reach planets or moons.
    Secondly, they are not life forms ready to compete or penetrate or destroy. They are elementary lego blocks of life specially designed to be able to assemble into millions of configurations in order to increase probability of getting anything survivable in wide variety of environmental conditions.

    Among millions of random assembles even a few best ones that would survive, they will be so simple and will have to evolve for hundreds of millions of years before starting to be like thr most prinitive life that you have right now.

    They are not designed to kill life or to replace life, but to support it and to spread it. Value and appreciate this. Your life is fragile. This parcel is you insurance the life will continue to prosper in universe no matter any wars, space disasters or star blasts.

    • Electronic Yogi

      Yeah the theory of Panspermia is indeed a thrilling one. I think there is some truth in it, but noone can prove it.

      • bwana


        When we venture out into space and start finding all life is based on DNA similar to ours, we’ll have the answer!

        • Electronic Yogi

          Yeah, I guess… except it is never a rewarding strategy to go out and try to prove your own ideas. You would need to set up some kind of hypothesis and then test it. Otherwise you quickly ends up cheating yourself.

          Btw, try to look up Chandra Wickramasinghe, he is working with some seriously interesting stuff in a solid way.

          • bwana

            But “trying to prove your own ideas” and “setting up some kind of hypothesis and testing it” are one in the same thing…

          • Electronic Yogi

            Well, not really. It may look like a semantic quarrel, but there is actually a big difference.

            By “trying to prove your own idea”, you are just looking for facts that support that idea. You are not testing it. And that is a common problem when you look around. You could easily be led to believe that your idea could be generalised without bound and you will be overlooking important observations that could negate your idea. It is really not a rewarding approach if you really wants to know or test something. It is counterproductive and delusional. But it is nevertheless an often used strategy to impose one’s own views about things in the world. Especially in politics.

            By “setting up some kind of hypothesis and testing it”, you would automatically have to consider situations, facts and observations that does not support your hypothesis or are excluding it. In the end you will be more aware of the boundaries of the hypothesis and you will know what is countering it. Perhaps you will even discover even more radical stuff along the way. It is a most fertile and rewarding method.

            In the example above about DNA, finding one piece of DNA outside Earth doesn’t prove the Panspermia hypothesis. It would support it somehow, but there is a lot more work to be done if we really wants to know if the theory is true or not.

            I am most thrilled to see what comes out the future planned mission to places like Europa. Perhaps there will be life there? Perhaps even DNA-based life? It is thrilling. But I am convinced that it is best to keep an open mind.

          • Michael Lucas Monterey

            Great suggestion.

      • Michael Lucas Monterey

        Conjecture: What if aminoacids, virions & tardigrades are the initiatory matrix/nodes of the universe’s panspermia-Gaia field of being/intelligence?

  • Jack Cluts

    This is the prelude to the arrival of Niburu – a spaceship the size of the small planet.

    • Max Derembourg

      That’s no moon…I mean small planet, ermph.

  • Spanky Lee

    There is no extraterrestrial life. Well, maybe some bacteria on some far way mud volcano, but nothing more. Nothing eukaryotic, nothing multi-cellular and certainly nothing technological. We are it baby! This amazing planet is the only place that dreams.

    • Electronic Yogi

      How do you know?

    • StickToFactsPls

      LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL – dream on Lee… sweet dreams :-)

    • Michael Lucas Monterey

      Spanky – That smacks of hubris or brash naivete. Look, when the Webb telescope is up & running, I predict that we will See that the observable universe is at least 20X bigger than 14^9 LY across. That will finish off the current Big Bang cosmological hypothesis (and the imaginary time-space bullgas) and all the other nonsense that ignores the fact that EM-magneto-dielectric force-phenomena are 10^39 stronger than the gravity effects of the noncurvy nonhypothetical field of universal reality.

  • Mike Bozart

    meta-monolithic, man.

  • Jason Jones

    I got my black shirt and sweat pants, brand new black-and-white Nike Decades athletic shoes ready to go!

  • Lynn

    How does this
    ” Its strange properties have even prompted some to suggest it’s of truly
    alien — as in, alien-built — origin. But those arguments don’t really
    hold up against the data we do have, Meech says, limited though it may

    line up with this

    “it comes from another solar system, so maybe that’s not so surprising.”

    Obviously, nothing they’ve thought of has matched so far, but they know ‘for sure’ that it’s not alien-built, even without any alien object to compare it to.

    • Electronic Yogi

      Yeah. Good point. I guess she’s trying to say that even though it is strange in many ways, it does not exclude a natural origin by any means.

      They did check the object for radio and electromagnetic signals by the way. Normally, electronics would send out small detectable signals unintentionally, but no signals were found.

      Jupiter could be a huge giant alien spaceship for instance, but in science you go by the most plausible and least crazy idea, and that is what you call Truth. Untill new data comes along and demands a new truth to be settled.

      • Michael Lucas Monterey

        Bravo! & Rite On EY. Good thinking well stated.

    • Michael Lucas Monterey

      Lynn – Good thinking. Yet, I’m betting on a less fantastic explanation involving a somewhat exotic mineralogical composition that causes EM acceleration and all the other “anomalous” phenomena, observed and unobserved. I also venture a conjecture that — minus counter-valing forces — Oumuamua is gradually speeding up with each orbital cycle. If that is true, then computing a source becomes an infinitely harder problem. Additionally, with so many anomalies and so little knowledge, it seems equally likely that another solar system is not the source. For example, all the studies of other solar systems with exoplanets reveal nothing but unexpected “anomalies” (the wrongness of SM hypotheses). Hence, I also predict that the next SM paradigm is immanent — probably concurrent with the view from the J Webb telescope, etc.

      • Lynn

        I am also betting on a less fantastic explanation, but I’m tired of people stating with surety that they ‘know’ what the unknown isn’t. Thank you all for your replies

      • Lynn

        All I’m saying is that if you don’t know for sure what it is, then you can’t know for sure what it isn’t.

  • Yatutza

    I wonder how this civilization thinkers claim that aliens aka any other advanced civilization SHOULD be using electronics and issue radio waves?
    They even spend their resorces on SETI for decades.

    200 years ago the same thinkers claimed that huge excess of horse poo on a planet SHOULD be an inevitable indicator of existence of any advanced civilization because they would need to many horses to move..

    You are not growing up

  • Devonian Wrighton

    Serves U.S. right many of astronauts have said we should be much futher along technologically. We’re not ready for whats coming let alone whats already here.


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


See More

Collapse bottom bar