Monsanto’s Newest Veggies Are High-Tech – But They Aren’t GMO

By Carl Engelking | January 28, 2014 1:37 pm

assortment of vegetablesYou may soon be seeing on your local grocery store’s shelves some exotic-sounding new fruits and veggies created by Monsanto. There’s the onion that won’t make you cry, the better-for-you broccoli, and the melon that won’t spoil when it’s ripe. But these aren’t the genetically-modified plants Monsanto has made its name on. Instead, biologists there are taking a high-tech approach to a very ancient kind of crop modification: crossbreeding.

These new technological tricks allow Monsanto to speed up the process of breeding better plants—by identifying the genes responsible for desirable traits and then scanning millions of seeds to select only the genetically-promising ones to plant and breed in the next generation.

Ben Paynter put the process into perspective in his Wired article about Monsanto’s veggies:

“In the real world, the odds of stacking 20 different characteristics into a single plant are one in 2 trillion. In nature, it can take a millennium. Monsanto can do it in just a few years.”

Directed Evolution

Monsanto scientists begin in the same way as farmers did in the Neolithic—breeding two plants that display desirable traits. But picking those plants is now aided by genetic knowledge. Using a trove of 40 million marker-trait associations and computer modeling, researchers can pinpoint the plants they want to breed, and predict the combination of genes in their offspring.

Then, to quickly sift through those offspring, genetics is once again put to use. A machine called a seed chipper, designed by Monsanto, quickly takes tiny tissue samples from a seed without destroying it. If a seed’s traits meet certain criteria, it is planted for field testing. The chipper saves time by allowing scientists to determine a plant’s genetic makeup without waiting for it to grow.

By using the hyper-efficient crossbreeding technique, Monsanto has recently released these novel vegetables to the produce section:

  • Beneforte broccoli: (rich in antioxidant-producing glucoraphanin)
  • EverMild onions: (lower lachrymatory factor, which means they won’t make you cry)
  • Melorange melon: (a melon that won’t spoil when ripe)
  • Frescada lettuce: (with more folate and more vitamin C)
  • BellaFina peppers: (smaller size, reduces waste)

To produce fortified Frescada lettuce, for example, Monsanto researchers crossed iceberg lettuce with romaine lettuce to boost folate levels by 146 percent, and vitamin C levels by 46 percent.

Away From GMOs

Monsanto’s shifted focus toward non-genetically-modified varieties appears to be an attempt to appease wary customers. Consumers have been hesitant to purchase genetically modified foods, despite a lack of evidence for any health harm from GMO foods, and some grocers, like Whole Foods, have committed to labeling GMO products in their stores within the next few years. Monsanto’s crossbred produce would avoid such labeling and any attendant stigma.

And that, Monsanto is hoping, will burnish the company’s reputation as a whole. “There isn’t a reputation silver bullet, but it helps,” Monsanto executive David Stark told Wired.

Photo credit: Ana Blazic Pavlovic/Shutterstock


CATEGORIZED UNDER: Living World, top posts
MORE ABOUT: agriculture
  • ms annette1

    I wonder what would #Vandanna Shiva have to say about this revolutionary ideology created by this Leviathan aka #Monsanto? Can someone please ask my hero?

    • Robert Lensch

      Yes..and it would be good to see her in a miniskirt

  • adamweishaupt

    Phenotipic Selection or Crossbreeding-Selection method.

  • Buddy199

    I can’t wait to hear why the Monsanto is The Devil crowd thinks this is a horrible idea.

  • thefermiparadox

    I hope we start directing our own evolution soon. In a real meaningful way. It’s time to be transhuman.

  • Wilson Cheung

    Crossbreeding is the world’s first technique of genetic modification. Those foods (and indeed all our foods) are GMO.

    • Herne Webber

      That’s not quite true. Genetic modification of the kind that upsets some people is putting genes into crops/animals that could never have gotten there by natural means, such as putting spider-silk genes into sheep to get spider-silk proteins from the transgenic sheep’s milk (it works, btw), or the botulinum toxin into corn (which kills non-target insects, such as monarch butterflies). Putting genes in this way can also cause a problem cross-breeding never could – transgenic weeds that are unrelated to the crop plants, created by bacterial vectors escaping the host crop plant directly into their weedy competitors. It’s kind of stupid to GM herbicide resistance in this way, because then one usually gets some weeds that become resistant as well due to unintended cross-contamination. However, all of that said, GM has a good side as well, that many science illiterate refuse to consider, such as human insulin made in bacteria, rather than gotten from pigs or cadavers, both of which can give diabetics problems. No science is good or evil. Its users determine its moral valence.

  • Robin Carr

    I wish —- would just stop 🛑 messing with our natural foods. Enough is enough. Those that are selling this crap are doing it for a buck without knowing or caring how such combos are destroying our guts and bodies. Once rare intestinal issues are becoming common because of this crap. There’s nothing wrong with our natural God given foods. Keep our food natural, pure, and healthy by not trying to play God and modify everything. Also, wish all poisons and toxic synthetic garbage would be banned as well.


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


See More

Collapse bottom bar