10 Surprising Secrets From Apollo 11’s Historic Moon Landing

By Carl Engelking | July 18, 2014 12:08 pm

(Credit: NASA)

This year is the 45th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing, the first time humans walked on the moon. The iconic imagery and audio from the mission is certainly seared into humankind’s collective consciousness, but there are a handful of side stories from the mission that are often overlooked. Here are some of the historical anecdotes that will change the way you remember man’s first foray on the moon.

10. “In the Event of Moon Disaster” 

Had the Apollo 11 moon landing gone horribly wrong, the world may have immortalized the words of William Safire, Richard Nixon’s speechwriter. You see, Safire had written a statement for Nixon to deliver in the wake of a hypothetical moon disaster. Rather than Neil Armstrong’s famous words, we may have committed an equally poetic phrase to memory: “Fate has ordained that men who went to the moon to explore in peace will stay on the moon to rest in peace.”

9. A Famous Misquote? 

When Neil Armstrong took his first step on the moon, he actually meant to say “That’s one small step for man.” People have argued whether a shoddy radio connection caused the misquote, or if Armstrong had a case of global stage fright and skipped over the tiny, but important, word.


8. Speaking of Those ‘First’ Words…

Armstrong gets all the credit for uttering the first words on the moon, but “That’s one small step…” wasn’t the first lunar sentence spoken — technically. Bob Berman, Slooh astronomer and author of Zoom, tells a different story that came out of an interview with Aldrin years ago. Berman says Aldrin was actually the first man to speak on the moon, but his quote wasn’t nearly as sexy. When the lander touched down, Aldrin simply said, “OK, engines stop.”

(For more insider stories about the Apollo 11 landing, be sure to tune into Slooh’s live webcast of the moon’s surface in HD — complete with commentary from Berman and other special guests.)

7. Armstrong Was Too Good a Pilot

Although it seems counter-intuitive, Armstrong landed the Eagle too softly on the surface of the moon. Berman says Armstrong was supposed to cut the engines when the lander was a few feet from the surface. NASA scientists built the lander with legs that would crumple upon impact to absorb the shock. Since Armstrong was such an ace pilot, the lander’s legs never crumpled. As a result, the astronauts had to exit the lander several feet higher than intended, which means that first small step was more of a leap.

6. That’s One Soggy Step 

Armstrong was the first human to step foot on the moon, but Aldrin holds the title as the first man to urinate on it. Upon stepping foot on the moon, Aldrin promptly emptied his bladder into his space suit’s internal urine collector. Unfortunately, Armstrong’s piloting skills came back to haunt Aldrin: when he made his higher-than-expected leap from the Eagle, his urine collector broke upon sticking the landing. As a result, one of Aldrin’s boots filled with pee when he relieved himself, Berman says. Fully aware that he was on a live radio feed, Aldrin kept that bit of information to himself.

buzz aldrin

Buzz Aldrin (Courtesy: NASA)

5. The Moon’s Aroma

Have you ever wondered what the moon smells like? When Aldrin and Armstrong, caked with moon dust, returned to the Eagle lander, they reported that the moon smelled a bit like wet ashes and gunpowder. Pressurizing the cabin upon their return was in itself a worrisome operation: some folks believed lunar dust was flammable, and would ignite as soon as it came in contact with oxygen. Luckily, that wasn’t the case.

4. Broadcasting in HD

We all remember that iconic video feed beamed to hundreds of millions of earthlings in 1969, but the video was actually captured in higher quality than we ever saw. That’s because the camera captured video in a format that commercial television stations couldn’t broadcast. NASA used a scan converter to adapt the video for U.S. broadcast signals, but by the time the images appeared on home television sets, the feed was substantially degraded.

However, thanks to technology, you can watch restored versions of the moon landing.

3. A Mother’s Concern

There are myriad things a moonwalker’s mother could worry about, but Neil Armstrong’s mom had just one real concern: that the lunar crust was too delicate and wouldn’t support her son’s weight when he walked on it.

2. What We Left Behind

Although every man on the Apollo 11 mission returned to Earth safely, they left plenty of artifacts back on the moon. Some items, such as a golden olive branch, American flag, Apollo 1 patch and a moon memorial disk, served a symbolic function.

But there was also plenty of junk left behind, including television cables, a camera, urine and defecation collection devices, tongs and a hammer to name a few. NASA has compiled a list of every single item the Apollo missions left behind on the moon.

1. A Second Chance

Aldrin may have never had the chance to walk on the moon because NASA turned down his initial application to become an astronaut. He tried again, and was accepted in the third group of astronauts in 1963; he became known as “Dr. Rendezvous.”

MORE ABOUT: moon, space exploration
  • Robert Karma

    I thought I was up to date on all of the trivia about the space program after years of study but I have to admit I didn’t know that Buzz had urinated into his boot as he checked out the Magnificent Desolation of the lunar surface. He may not have been the first to walk on the moon but surely he was the first to pee on the moon!

    • Dallas Joe

      I found a video of authentic moon landing footage;
      which shows CLEARLY ….. strings, attached to BOTH
      “astronauts” , if anyone is interested.

      I cannot post a link… because it ends up being deleted by the mods.

      the video is called :
      Apollo 17 EVA 1 – Return to LM, SEP Deployment, & EVA 1 Close-out

      and if you start it at 21:21 …… you might change your mind,
      about whether or not they fooled you….

  • http://blogs.discovermagazine.com Mike Oak

    Neil Armstrong did say “one small step for ‘a’ man…” It’s the media that took the “a” away by removing it from a lot of subsequent copies. I suspect it made for a better “sound bite”. Please, you’re a science writer, you should have checked.

    • Mr. Shadow

      Sorry, but Armstrong himself said that he said the phrase wrong.

    • Lilly

      Mike; Your comment is probably THE stupidest comment I’ve ever read on the internet ever about any subject. Congratulations. Wht do you do in your spare time besides playing with toilet paper rolls?

      • http://blogs.discovermagazine.com Mike Oak

        Trolling just makes you look like an even bigger jerk.

      • Redhands


    • Mac

      The ‘a’ didn’t come through in the transmission, if Armstrong did indeed say it. I didn’t hear an ‘a’ at the time, and I thought what a strange comment, it doesn’t make sense, but if an ‘a’ is placed before ‘man’, Armstrong’s statement does make sense.
      Before the landing, there had been a lot of speculation about what the first words from the moon would be, like “Uh, duh…”

  • ToSeek

    “that first small step was more of a leap.”

    This is inaccurate – the first small step was off the LM footpad. They did have to take a big leap off the ladder and onto the footpad, but that wasn’t onto the surface of the Moon.

    • Nedward Marbletoe

      so the first footprint was from a small step. kewl.

  • Sammy6

    What a totally ‘guy’ thing to do. We flew to the moon. We landed there. We peed on it. Borrowing from the famous latin phrase, I came, I saw, I peed?

    • Tim Cadell

      Veni, vidi, pipi?

      • libbydbone

        my buddy’s sister makes $87 every hour on the internet
        . She has been unemployed for 6 months but last month her payment was $19402
        just working on the internet for a few hours. go right here C­a­s­h­f­i­g­.­C­O­M­

      • dorothywjenkins

        until I saw the paycheck which said $8694 , I didn’t believe that my
        sister was like trully erning money part time on there computar. . there
        friends cousin had bean doing this for only thirteen months and resantly
        repayed the dept on their home and bought themselves a Infiniti . check out the
        post right here C­a­s­h­f­i­g­.­C­O­M­

      • keithjfinger

        My Uncle Matthew recently got a new cream
        Ford Shelby GT500 Coupe by working part-time off of a laptop… visit this
        website J­a­m­2­0­.­C­O­M­

      • Nevet


    • Lilly

      So, what would a woman have done, held it until she got back to Earth 5 days later? What a dumba$$ comment. Get a grip.

      • SixSixSix

        Needed a bigger mouthed pee collector. What else? Or a catheter – wow first catheter on the moon.

      • Sammy6

        Somebody took an extra crabby pill this morning. How hypersensitive do you have to be to take offense at a joke clearly aimed at the stupid things us guys do? Hey, Lilly, the man-haters club called. They’ve extended your platinum membership.

        • Jeffrey J Nelson

          Must not have gotten her maximum cramp relief this month.

      • SeeToSee

        Watch a few episodes of Honey Boo Boo if you need a crash course in female pee humor. Marking the moon or peeing our name in moon dust isn’t part of our biological makeup. We deal with biology-meets-clothing horrors well beyond pee in our boots, anyway.

      • gmk kmg

        ”Houston, we have a… you know what? Forget about it.”
        ”What’s wrong?”
        ”No no, it’s nothing, really…”

        • TheLawngBallzKid


      • Dallas Joe

        I found a video of authentic moon landing footage;
        which shows CLEARLY ….. strings, attached to BOTH
        “astronauts” , if anyone is interested.

        I cannot post a link… because it ends up being deleted by the mods.

        the video is called :
        Apollo 17 EVA 1 – Return to LM, SEP Deployment, & EVA 1 Close-out

        and if you start it at 21:21 …… you might change your mind,
        about whether or not they fooled you.

    • James Cheatham

      So that makes it ours?

    • Basketball God

      Totally ignorant comment. Typical peasant viewpoint.

    • Dallas Joe

      this Youtube video of actual footage :
      Apollo 17 EVA 1 – Return to LM, SEP Deployment, & EVA 1 Close-out
      ( if you start it at 21:21 ) shows the STRINGS attached to the top/center of Both

      They look like antennae , but they are not.
      They are Multiple strings, or shiny rubber bands.
      I posted the name of the video, because the Link needs to be “approved by D-brief”.

      • Lorie Franceschi

        Actually video from Apollo 11 was lost in Houston. They have had to ask the television networks from around the world to get copies from them. So if anything looks “funny” for the conspiracy peeps like yourself, it is from 1)the film, vhs and copies and 2) since the films that are viewable from NASA have problems being clear 3) CGI at the time if it was around, would in the womb and would have had a difficult time faking what was seen. One last thing, if the landings were faked, our Cold War enemies Russia and China would have been screaming “Fake, Fake” to everyone that would listen to discredit the USA. Boy i dislike it when people that only use one source as their reason to say “Fake” about landing on the Moon. Were you even alive and old enough to understand what happened on July 20 – 21, 1969?

  • Buddy199

    From the list:

    Golf balls (2)

    100 – 2 Dollar bills

    Tie tack

    Falcon feather


    No man has ever ascended
    higher than 300 miles,
    if that high, above the Earth’s surface. No man has ever orbited,
    landed on, or walked upon the moon in any publicly known space program.
    If man has ever truly been to the moon it has been done in secret and
    with a far different technology.

    The tremendous radiation encountered in the Van Allen Belt, solar
    radiation, cosmic radiation, temperature control, and many other problems
    connected with space travel prevent living organisms leaving our
    atmosphere with our known level of technology. Any intelligent high
    school student with a basic physics book can prove NASA faked the Apollo
    moon landings.

    If you doubt this please explain how the astronauts walked upon the
    moon’s surface enclosed in a space suit in full sunlight absorbing a
    minimum of 265 degrees of heat surrounded by a vacuum. NASA tells us the
    moon has no atmosphere and that the astronauts were surrounded by the
    vacuum of space.

    Heat is defined as the vibration or movement of molecules within matter.
    The faster the molecular motion the higher the temperature. The slower
    the molecular motion the colder the temperature. Absolute zero is that
    point where all molecular motion ceases. In order to have hot or cold
    molecules must be present.

    A vacuum is a condition of nothingness where there are no molecules.
    Vacuums exist in degrees. Some scientists tell us that there is no such
    thing as an absolute vacuum. Space is the closest thing to an absolute
    vacuum that is known to us. There are so few molecules present in most
    areas of what we know as “space” that any concept of “hot” or “cold” is
    impossible to measure. A vacuum is a perfect insulator. That is why a
    “Thermos” or vacuum bottle is used to store hot or cold liquids in order
    to maintain the temperature for the longest time possible without
    re-heating or re-cooling.

    Radiation of all types will travel through a vacuum but will not affect
    the vacuum. Radiant heat from the sun travels through the vacuum of
    space but does not “warm” space. In fact the radiant heat of the sun has
    no affect whatsoever until it strikes matter. Molecular movement will
    increase in direct proportion to the radiant energy which is absorbed by
    matter. The time it takes to heat matter exposed to direct sunlight in
    space is determined by its color, its elemental properties, its distance
    from the sun, and its rate of absorption of radiant heat energy. Space
    is NOT hot. Space is NOT cold.

    Objects which are heated
    cannot be cooled by space. In order for an object to cool it must first be removed
    from direct sunlight. Objects which are in the shadow of another object
    will eventually cool but not because space is “cold”. Space is not cold.
    Hot and cold do not exist in the vacuum of space. Objects cool because
    the laws of motion dictate that the molecules of the object will slow
    down due to the resistance resulting from striking other molecules until
    eventually all motion will stop provided the object is sheltered from
    the direct and/or indirect radiation of the sun and that there is no
    other source of heat. Since the vacuum of space is the perfect insulator
    objects take a very long time to cool even when removed from all sources
    of heat, radiated or otherwise.

    NASA insists the space suits the astronauts supposedly wore on the lunar
    surface were air conditioned. An air conditioner cannot, and will not
    work without a heat exchanger. A heat exchanger simply takes heat
    gathered in a medium such as freon from one place and transfers it to
    another place. This requires a medium of molecules which can absorb and
    transfer the heat such as an atmosphere or water. An air conditioner
    will not and cannot work in a vacuum. A space suit surrounded by a
    vacuum cannot transfer heat from the inside of the suit to any other
    place. The vacuum, remember, is a perfect insulator. A man would roast
    in his suit in such a circumstance.

    NASA claims the spacesuits were cooled by a water system which was piped
    around the body, then through a system of coils sheltered from the sun
    in the backpack. NASA claims that water was sprayed on the coils causing
    a coating of ice to form. The ice then supposedly absorbed the
    tremendous heat collected in the water and evaporated into space. There
    are two problems with this that cannot be explained away. 1) The amount
    of water needed to be carried by the astronauts in order to make this
    work for even a very small length of time in the direct 55o
    over the boiling point of water (210oF at sea level on Earth)
    heat of the sun could not have possibly been carried by the astronauts.
    2) NASA has since claimed that they found ice in moon craters. NASA
    claims that ice sheltered from the direct rays of the sun will NOT
    evaporate, destroying their own bogus “air conditioning” explanation.

    Remember this. Think about it the next time you go off in the morning
    with a “vacuum bottle” filled with hot coffee. Think about it long and
    hard when you sit down and pour a piping hot cup from your thermos to
    drink with your lunch four hours later. . . and then think about it
    again when you pour the last still very warm cup of coffee at the end of
    the day.

    The same laws of physics apply to any vehicle traveling through space.
    NASA claims that the spacecraft was slowly rotated causing the shadowed
    side to be cooled by the intense cold of space. . . an intense cold that
    DOES NOT EXIST. In fact the only thing that could have been accomplished
    by a rotation of the spacecraft is a more even and constant heating such
    as that obtained by rotating a hot dog on a spit. In reality a dish
    called Astronaut a la Apollo would have been served. At the very least
    you would not want to open the hatch upon the crafts return.

    NASA knows better than to claim, in addition, that a water cooling
    apparatus such as that which they claim cooled the astronauts suits
    cooled the spacecraft. No rocket could ever have been launched with the
    amount of water needed to work such a system for even a very short period
    of time. Fresh water weighs a little over 62 lbs. per cubic foot. Space
    and weight capacity were critical given the lift capability of the
    rockets used in the Apollo Space Program. No such extra water was
    carried by any mission whatsoever for suits or for cooling the

    On the tapes the Astronauts complained bitterly of the cold during their
    journey and while on the surface of the moon. They spoke of using heaters
    that did not give off enough heat to overcome the intense cold of space.
    It was imperative that NASA use this ruse because to tell the truth
    would TELL THE TRUTH. It is also proof of the arrogance and contempt in
    which the Illuminati holds the common man.

    What we heard is in reality indicative of an over zealous cooling system
    in the props used during the filming of the missions at the Atomic
    Energy Commission’s Nevada desert test site, where it is common to see
    temperatures well over 100o. In the glaring unfiltered direct
    heat of the sun the Astronauts could never have been cold at any time
    whatsoever in the perfect insulating vacuum of space.

    NASA claims that the space suits worn by the astronauts were pressurized
    at 5 psi over the ambient pressure (0 psi vacuum) on the moon’s surface.
    We have examined the gloves NASA claims the astronauts wore and find
    they are made of pliable material containing no mechanical, hydraulic,
    or electrical devices which would aid the astronauts in the dexterous
    use of their fingers and hands while wearing the gloves. Experiments
    prove absolutely that such gloves are impossible to use and that the
    wearer cannot bend the wrist or fingers to do any dexterous work
    whatsoever when filled with 5 psi over ambient pressure either in a
    vacuum or in the earth’s atmosphere. NASA actually showed film and
    television footage of astronauts using their hands and fingers normally
    during their EVAs on the so-called lunar surface. The films show clearly
    that there is no pressure whatsoever within the gloves . . . a condition
    that would have caused explosive decompression of the astronauts
    resulting in almost immediate death if they had really been surrounded
    by the vacuum of space.

    If you don’t believe it try it yourself . . . it is a very simple
    experiment and does not require a rocket scientist to perform. These are
    just two of over a hundred very simple and very easy to prove valid
    scientific reasons why NASA and the Apollo Space Program are two of the
    biggest lies ever foisted upon the unsuspecting and trusting People of
    the world.

    • Haywood Yablowmie


      • jsplegge

        A special kind of moron. One might say fractally moronic.

    • Buddy199

      So, NASA launched 18 manned missions in front of tens of thousands of spectators at Cape Canaveral that actually never went to the moon? Thanks for clearing that up.

      • BinaryWatcher

        1. We spent billions and developed the entire Apollo program, all to hoax it? It wouldn’t be possible to do so without building – and launching – SOMEthing. AND
        sending it all the way to the moon and back. Because radar observations and radio signals.

        2. Which leads to the second point, we were deep in the Cold War, AND a space race with the USSR, and the Soviets were watching. They would have busted us for the fakery, and crowed about it for a thousand years.

        3. And how many people were directly or closely related to the Apollo program? 250,000 or more? Yet we are supposed to believe that they’ve all kept their mouths shut
        since? All of them? Impossible. Absurd.

        • imnottellingu

          RIght. My father helped put man on the moon and there is no way he could or would fake answers to all the questions I bombarded him with over the years. Sorry. Anyone who thinks this was fake is a moron.

          • BinaryWatcher

            Of course, you know, imnottellingu, the True Believers just consider us insiders, part of the whole “conspiracy” that kept their ludicrous secret. Whatever. The Soviets sure weren’t, but they didn’t raise a protest.

          • Dallas Joe

            no one “thinks” its fake.
            we KNOW its fake.
            Common sense tells us.

          • Tinwoods

            Get some help, Dallas Joe. Dallas Joe? Let me guess, a Comrade Drumph supporter? TrumpBot.

          • lex lexich

            to me it is fascinating that even 50 years later noone sent at least a robot up there to film in HD the landing sites so we could know once and for all, i mean how expensive would be today to send a small rover/robot/drone with camera

        • Dallas Joe

          Soviets are lying to their people too.
          they don’t tell us our secrets,
          as long as We don’t tell them theirs.
          Did you ever consider that ?
          Its about MONEY. and Fooling your own country.

    • Timothy Culley

      Everything that is not at absolute zero looses heat through radiation whether in a vacuum or not. Objects shaded in space are receiving almost no heat from outside sources and so they cool very rapidly. Fast enough that a rotating spacecraft will loose more energy from its shaded surfaces than it gains from the surfaces with the sun shining on them. This is why manned spacecraft require heaters.

      Don’t try to make a case that we can’t fly in space just because you misunderstand thermodynamics.

      • Dallas Joe

        I found a video of authentic moon landing footage;
        which shows CLEARLY ….. strings, attached to BOTH
        “astronauts” , if anyone is interested.

        I cannot post a link… because it ends up being deleted by the mods.

        the video is called :
        Apollo 17 EVA 1 – Return to LM, SEP Deployment, & EVA 1 Close-out

        and if you start it at 21:21 …… you might change your mind,
        about whether or not they fooled you. omg

    • Brian

      Where do you get your information. I’m curious. Are you yourself a scientist. Please respond to B-Man on Twitter
      thank you.

      • BinaryWatcher

        I seriously doubt he is.

        But I am.

        • Brian

          I never got the chance to see any artifacts from the moon walk. Up here in Canada, we were barraged with all kinds of info.

    • Lorie Franceschi

      Think about this: If a vacuum has no molecules than what you are saying about cold and heat has a big flaw in it, which means since there are none of the little guys to move around there is no movement to generate heat, so, by inference, there is cold.

      There are many other Items that you tried to “explain” about the Apollo missions that are totally wrong and have no merit.

      Make sure you understand what you are talking about before you start babbling.

      • Dallas Joe

        you guys sure make up alot of reasons that keep you believing. WOW.

        You sound like Religious fanatics.

        • Lorie Franceschi

          Of course you still probably think that the earth is the center of the universe. Watched it live. Too many instruments were left on moon that are still used today 49 years later.

          • Dallas Joe

            Have you seen the interview of the astronaut, that was asked why
            we have not gone to the moon again? ……..
            He flat-out said “We do not have the technology”…….

            What you saw on television, was scripted, and a movie.
            And if there is ANYTHING on the moon….. it was put there
            by rockets and un-manned craft.

            Research the Van Allen radiation belts.

            It really sucks to find out that NASA is a big phony,
            they even fooled the Russians , for God’s sakes.
            but its true. they fooled us all.
            I refuse to believe anymore.
            Good day.

          • http://www.cfcpny.com/ CFCP Patriots

            The claim about the Van Allen radiation belts has been debunked…..You say to research,but you clearly have not researched enough.

          • Dallas Joe

            How do you “debunk” sending monkeys into space,
            and them DYING when going through the belts ?

            Looks like you are pointing 3 fingers at yourself, while pointing one at me…

          • Lorie Franceschi

            Unless the monkeys were in orbit of at least 400 miles, they were not close to the Van Allen Belts. The belts are a barrier to fast moving electrons from hitting Tera. They vary in their height with energy from Sol(our sun, star or what you want to call it). Much like the distance the Northern and Southern lights are from the magnetic poles. Only one monkey reach the belts, 600 miles up, d.and he lived to ripe old age. Again your research has proved your downfall

          • Lorie Franceschi

            Have an uncle that worked for Aerojet out of Sacramento CA. He was an accountant. He told us that every job order was given to the company with the lowest bid as long as it did not go over the budget that was given for a project. Said that NASA planned built the zMoon landings from the beginnings of the space age on a shoestring. In other words not much money. The technology that was in the landing module’s three on board computers is easily surpassed by the technology of one TI 83 calculator. We have the technology to go back to Luna, we just don’t have a rocket to do it with right now.

          • Tinwoods

            You’re still a raving moron, Dally Joe. Tally ho?

          • Dallas Joe

            I watched Magicians on stage do some magical things too.
            And I even had some Card -trick guy, do some incredible stuff…
            and It seemed real.
            Its too bad, that a lot of people can’t understand that they were fooled.
            Seeing something with your own eyes, does not always make it real.
            Except in your mind.

          • Lorie Franceschi

            NASA did a great job of hoodwinking billions of people then. Includi,g our Cold War enemies , the former Soviet Union and Mainland China. The USA sent 14 men to walk on the Moon, 12 did. Think about this, if even for a second, if the Soviet Union or China thought any of those missions were fake they would have called us out to make the USA look bad among th countries of Earth. They did not do it, because they knew that we really did go to the Moon and walk on its syrface.

          • Dallas Joe

            by the way LORIE :
            If out “enemies” the Soviets and China ( lol )
            know that getting to the moon is POSSIBLE..

            Why have they NOT gone at least… SECOND ?

            Is the moon Worthless?

            Can it not serve as some sort of Base ? ??

            Can we not live on the moon temporarily,
            and learn how to live in space… whilst trying to get to MARS ???

            Why is the moon, not a place for other countries to go to, TOO ???

            Please answer those.

          • Lorie Franceschi

            You must be an agitator and royal believer of conspiracy people. Or not yet been born before we sent Armstrong to Luna (the other name for the Moon in ccase you had not come across that in all your so called research). We did not go back to Luna and start a base is because Nixon asked for and received from Congress a cut to NASA’s budget. We had fulfill Kennedy’s promise of puting men men on the moon before the end of the decade.
            Each time after that, when a president asks to raise NASA’s budget to go to Mars or back to Luna, they do. Each time a president wants to cut NASA’s Congress does so. Pretty hard to do anything big when your budget keeps going up and down. Private companies are now trying to go back to Luna.
            During the 1960’s, The big thing was to reach Luna first. The Russians and many firsts. Satallite, man in space ( do know is name?) And the first space walk to name a few. Russia also landed first on Luna and the first to take pictures of the far side of Luna

          • Lorie Franceschi

            You need to do some reading on that time period of not only world history but of what is considered the history. Of the space race in the 1930 til today. To answer your questions would take way too much time. Start with Hitler and is v1 and v2 rockets and go through the launching of the ISS. You will get all your questions answered.

          • Lorie Franceschi

            If the moon landings of almost 40 years ago were faked, do you not think that at the time our two biggest enemies would shout it from the tallest mountain? Russia an China would be screaming that we faked everything! A littlresearch on the political history of the time would show that Russia and China were just waiting for something that they could use against us. Please use some of your brain power to good use and research the political happenings of the late 1960’s and early 1970’s.
            Then get back to me, with proof that we did not send men to the moon.
            The movie Capcricorn one is just what it was supposed to be a science fiction movie. That is what start the conspiracist theories that the moon landings were faked. The movie was about men going to Mars.

          • Tinwoods

            Don’t bother trying to educate those who are willfully ignorant. They’re angrily stupid and proud of it.

    • Nedward Marbletoe

      Australian aborigines sya they went to the moon, but I don’t think they left footprints.

  • Haywood Yablowmie

    It wasn’t “engines stop”, it was “engine stop”. There was only one descent engine.

    • Jim Oberg

      And it was no secret, it was heard and recorded and published immediately.

  • z4luvr

    Best quote was when Aldrin jumped down from the LEM and said, “That may have been one small step for Neil, but it sure seemed like a big one to me!”

    • Nordguy

      That wasn’t Aldrin. That was Pete Conrad on Apollo 12

      • z4luvr

        Sorry – should have known that. Pete Conrad was a funny guy.

      • darryl

        Apparently Pete won a bet from a reporter who didn’t believe that he could say what he wanted to when he first walked. I guess he never did get paid his $1500.


      • Daniel Webster

        Buzz was probably thinking it though because Armstrong was such a good pilot he landed it without the legs crumpling even though they were designed to crumple consequently they were several feet off the ground

  • Luke101

    What do we have now to be proud of?
    -Nothing but a stupid and useless ISS, that was a moronic pc inspired idea in the first place. We could have built a moon base by now…..

    • BinaryWatcher

      No. Originally we were working on Space Station Freedom, an entirely US-based construct. It wasn’t until the politicians in DC got involved that it suddenly got designated an INTERNATIONAL space station.

      • http://blogs.discovermagazine.com Eric Lipps

        “The politicians in DC” were involved form day one. Where do you think the money came from? And the station became an international project because of the money; making it multinational meant other countries could be gotten to chip in.

        • BinaryWatcher

          Unfortunately not. I was active in the program at that time, though i was working Shuttle, not Station — but I had plenty of colleagues who crossed between the programs, so I’m well aware of what was happening. NASA went forward with a budget that included SSF, and it was approved as a domestic station. The next president to enter office was the one who determined – pretty much unilaterally, from what I could tell – that it was going to be international. As for other countries chipping in, not so much as you might think. E.g. we paid Russia several times over for “their” module; the first payments were used to patch up Mir; subsequent payments went to corrupt Russian officials. Eventually, once everybody had lovely seaside summer mansions, the Russian module got built.

          Had we maintained control of the station, we would have a much more functional station, because the entire structure would be built using the same standards for power, data, etc. As it is there are literally parts of Station that do not talk to each other, and utilize sneakernet to pass data. Why? Because the politicians in their infinite wisdom didn’t see fit to let NASA be in charge, and there was no one authority who could determine specs. So everybody built their modules to their own nationality’s specifications. Ever tried to plug an American hairdryer into a European power outlet? Yeah, that.

          • BinaryWatcher

            …More, the original Station Freedom was intended to be an eventual way station for future lunar missions, including attempts to establish a base.

          • Nedward Marbletoe

            Very interesting first-hand info. Thx.

          • BinaryWatcher


    • Nedward Marbletoe

      Go Moon Base! But ISS is cool, anything up there is cool. Moon Base wouldn’t have the risk of falling out of the sky since the moon is actually orbiting further up each year.

  • Don Haywood

    I thought the actual first words were “Tranquility base here. The Eagle has landed.” The “Engine stopped” happened before the LEM artually touched down.

    • darryl

      Those were the first broadcast words. The first spoken words were from Buzz, he said something like “Contact light” Referring to the light on the control panel that lit up and told them one of the lander legs touched the ground.


  • Don Haywood

    I wonder, too, is some off the intercom/radio comments were made as well. Like – F*** that was close.”

  • Plenum

    Point 8: The dropped, “a” in “…that’s one small step for (a) man,…” was NOT due to a shoddy communications system! The communication system was VOICE-ACTIVATED for the practical reason of saving battery power. — If you recall, the transmissions almost always started with a few hundredths of a seconds delay, with a lag-time. [The word “very” would sound like “airy”, for example, but we would understand it, of course, as “very”.] He stated the first part of the sentence, which was with continuous voicing (thus no break, “+voicing characteristic” (mostly) for you phoneticians) then, with a break to say “a man”, BUT THE VOICE ACTIVATION SYSTEM SHUT OFF, and then he continued with “a man”, but the voice-activation delay unintentionally omitted the “a” in “…(a) man…”, but “man” was transmitted in its entirety because the transmission was activated by the missing “a”. — I heard the above in an interview with one of the crew members, years ago, I can’t remember which one – it may have been Armstrong – but it explains the lost word. ((I teach English, and use this example in some advanced classes to point out unstressed/stressed words within the English phonological system.)) Thanks for reading…

    • Maria_Octo

      Listening at the clip above, he did not pause long enough for the “a” to be dropped. He goofed is what he did.

      • Plenum

        Well, I wasn’t halucinating when I saw the interview in which he explained very clearly what happened…. Hmm. And I’ve spent some time today listening to various recordings to the famous moment, and they match the clip above. And, then I located a writer who asked him about the famous moment and he mentions the controversy and not the voice-activated transmission system. Maybe the interview I saw was his technical excuse to avoid saying, “I goofed in one of the most important moments in the history of Mankind.” Anyway, you’re right, Maria, there doesn’t appear to be enough time to say, “a”… no break between. He continues right through from “for” to “man”.

  • Polaris1

    Aldrin’s “OK engine stop” was made when the contact light lit on the panel. The LM then fell the remaining three feet to the surface (a procedure discontinued in the later heavier LM’s). I would suggest that if you’re still moving towards something then you haven’t got there yet. The first words spoken on the moon would therefore have been Aldrin’s “ACA out of detent”. Sloppy research.

    • Dave Gianakos

      My understanding is that Armstrong did NOT feel comfortable shutting the engine off five feet (60 inch long probes on three of the four footpads) above the surface when the lunar sensor probe lights came on for this first ever landing attempt. NASA acceded to his requests, but that meant the LM closeout crews needed to add extra kapton film around the foot pads to protect them from the heat and blowing debris of landing with the engine still operating to the surface. The LM was already stowed inside the adapter in the Saturn V SLA (conical adapter between the third stage and the Apollo spacecraft and it was a tight fit. You can see the extra kapton on the footpads in some photos.

  • preciousbwallace

    Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail

    ✒✒✒✒✒✒ Jobs7000.Com


  • Nedward Marbletoe

    That’s what I heard him say on some interview, that he said it right. Easy to believe the “a” could be hard to hear. Any way it just made the quote more famous. They were some righteous dudes.

  • Nedward Marbletoe

    Best article evah!

    The moon smells like wet ashes and gunpowder, and there’s $200 and 4 days of food stashed up there. That might even be useful someday.

    • Shannon Varga

      Next time I’m feeling hungry I’m going make my way upto the moon for some preserved food

    • Dallas Joe

      Yep.. and they came back from the Moon 1 day faster than it took to get there.

      That was in itself.. amazing.

  • Mikey Doesn’t Like It

    The lengths you NoBama synchophants go to and stupidity you exhibit as you continue to delude yourself into believing that the vote you gave the organizer-in-chief wasn’t a massive mistake just beggars belief! He has continued to prove the case I made since the day he first announced his candidacy. He had no experience that in any way, shape or form qualified him for the office of the Presidency. Everything he has done or tried to do since has proved that over and over. As the Brits love to say “He couldn’t organize a piss-up in a brewery.” Nixon was a crook but the Watergate break in, such a sensation when it occurred, pales in comparison to the litany of offenses this administratration has and continues to commit and the way they play fast and loose with the Constitution when it suits them to do so. Why is it that you and others like you just turn a blind eye to the criminality and constantly try to point fingers in every other direction to take the spotlight away from the criminal in chief you elected like you have done right here? I’m not saying that Romney would have been any better but at least he had the experience of being a Governor. And one thing is for sure, he couldn’t have done any worse than the clown currently in the white house and the circus of fools supporting him in the legislature.

  • AKP

    What happened to the comments left by “FACTS”?

  • Redhands

    JFK beat Nixon, with votes of the dead in, Chicago. That gave jfk Illinois & WH. Nixon, took US out of V.Nam, was the last Pres. were savings in bank beat inflation, was strongly against fracking because of fresh water & other environmental concerns.
    Nixon, won his second election by a very large margin, but Hillary (not Clinton yet) “found” missing minuets on “WH tapes”. Odd, Bill was working with McCarthy election committee . The tape was from a different machine then the WH one.
    I will concede, I’m VERY disappointed of the slow progress of the US of A’s space program!

  • maias

    Why doesn’t the flag have a shadow? The man’s shadow goes from left to right.

    • Dallas Joe

      Wow.. no one answered you.
      and its been 3 FRICKIN YEARS .
      and you’re Right.
      NO SHADOW.


      • Tinwoods

        Another sorrowful nutcase.

    • Dallas Joe

      I found more footage !
      a video of authentic moon landing footage;
      which shows CLEARLY ….. strings, attached to BOTH
      “astronauts” , if anyone is interested.

      I cannot post a link… because it ends up being deleted by the mods.

      the video is called :
      Apollo 17 EVA 1 – Return to LM, SEP Deployment, & EVA 1 Close-out

      and if you start it at 21:21 …… you might change your mind,
      about whether or not they fooled you.

  • Wizzy

    Can someone explain to me why Houston asks them questions and the astronauts respond within 1 second?

    It would take at least 3 seconds for the transmission to get to the moon and then back to Earth, not counting the time it would take a human to respond to a question???

    Looking for a reasonable explanation.

    • Dallas Joe

      Its because the Moon landings were ALL faked.

      If you want to see the strings….
      I found a video of authentic moon landing footage;
      which shows CLEARLY ….. strings, attached to BOTH
      “astronauts” , if anyone is interested.

      I cannot post a link… because it ends up being deleted by the mods.

      the video is called :
      Apollo 17 EVA 1 – Return to LM, SEP Deployment, & EVA 1 Close-out

      and if you start it at 21:21 …… you might change your mind,
      about whether or not they fooled you.

    • Tinwoods

      It’s amazing how ignorant you whacky conspiracy lunatics are.

  • doctor uziku

    want to thank Dr uziku for the Herbal HIV
    medicine he gave to me and my
    daughter, i was suffering from HIV when i gave birth
    to my daughter and
    that was how my daughter got the sickness indirect
    from me, but to God be
    the glory that i am heal with the herbal medicine that
    Dr uziku gave to me
    when i emailed him. i want to use this medium to tell
    everyone that the
    solution to our sickness has come,so i will like you
    to contact this great
    healer on his email address, doctoruzikuspel
    ltemple@yahoo.com with him all
    your pains will be gone,i am really happy today that
    i and my daughter are
    cured of HIV, we are now Negative after the use of
    his Herb medicine, my
    specialist doctor confirm it. once more i say a big
    thank to you Dr uziku
    for healing hands upon my life and my daughter, i
    say may God continue to
    bless you abundantly and give you more power to
    keep helping those that
    needs your help in their lives. email him now he is
    waiting to receive you.
    him +2348105602898

  • Daniel Webster

    They’re right about the word a that changes the whole context of the sentence what this says is thats one small step for mankind one giant leap for mankind when you say just man that typically means mankind

  • Westernboy Ony

    Any can tell meh that how can I contact with NASA plzz

  • Dallas Joe

    I’ve seen old movies of rocket ships,
    that look the same.
    Its just so FAKE.
    Ok NASA, these people believe everything you tell them,
    but c’mon man, you KNOW you’re stealing all that
    Tax payer MONEY.

    • Tinwoods

      Always got to be some delusional paranoid in any comment section regarding the moon landings. Probably voted for Comrade Drumph,

  • Dallas Joe

    Yeah sure,
    Weightlessness on the moon,
    yet They didn’t float away.

    And shouldn’t the feather have fallen
    at 1/6th the speed ? or at least ,
    the hammer ?

    you can say that not having an atmosphere on the
    moon, would cause the feather to have nothing to
    slow it down…
    but then, you have to take WEIGHT into consideration.
    Heavy things should and WILL fall faster.

    I call BS on this one.
    And if this is BS.. the ENTIRE LANDING
    was FAKE.

    • Matthew

      Dallas Joe. Why dont you go and explore your wife’s bum hole before she gets it stitched up, like she did her vagina just to stop you getting at it so much. Or the bottom of the ocean while after having a lead weight shoved down your frickin throat. Jeez what a bore. Axxclown!!

    • Tinwoods

      Yep. Another under-educated nut job.

  • Dallas Joe

    I always wondered why the capsule, when “blasting” off from the moon,
    in 1/6th the gravity, did not have any THRUST.
    ….. it Simply flashes, and disconnects from the bottom half…
    then…. wooooooop ! Just floats up up and away ! …
    and bobbles like it was on a String, or something…..

    A sound minded person would think, that at 1/6th the gravity,
    there would be more Thrust…
    Whats up with that. ?

  • vixen

    NASA is freemason-controlled deceit; we’re supposed to be spinning at
    66,600 miles per hour around the sun (666); research flat earth.

  • Lorie Franceschi

    Did you know that astronautsdid you know that,astronauts have to go through customs?they also have government passports. Don’t know what type, but not a normal one.

  • right_most_of_the_time

    Anyone ever wonder why no other nations have gone to the moon? is it really that the US is so technologically advanced? yet we could go in 1969 but not today in the 21st century? that it is just too expensive? what about the chinese? China is a very wealthy nation (we owe them like a trillion dollars) and have advanced technology too. Didn’t they say not that long ago that they were planning a manned moon mission? could it be they found that it is impossible to get there. on paper, and in theory, and in the movies it’s very simple to get to the moon or mars. however, in reality much more difficult. if the intention is to get there and not return, like a suicide mission, i believe it is possible. notice how NASA has never had any unmanned probes return back to earth. that’s not just because the probe can transmit its findings via radio signal but because it is too difficult to blast off from the surface of even the moon. you need a lot of fuel to do even the simplest of things in space like turn around or adjust trajectory and so forth. the fuel has to be stored somewhere and it takes up alot of space (no pun intended). not to mention the issue of radiation in space which is bad as Dr. Van Allen previously stated. He later stated that the radiation isn’t as bad as first thought but what made him change his mind when no other probes had been launched to measure radiation in the van allen belts? most likely NASA officials pressured him to change his findings so it would seem possible to travel safely through the Belts with minimal or no radiation shield at all. The moon is a huge radioactive rock by the way. I found the info on a nasa website page dated from 2005. there is two types of radiation found on the moon’s surface and a russian scientist was asked which radiation is deadly and the russian scientist was quoted as saying “both”. of course the NASA scientist said you could survive the radiation there for two days (yet the longest stay was three days by Apollo 17). I go to the dentist office to get an x-ray and they put a lead vest on me and the tech steps out of the room. the astronauts of apollo 17 are on the moon for three days with no radiation shield of any kind, hmmm…interesting. of course all the experts say is that radiation accumulates over time, it’s this accumulation effect that plays havoc to our health except ultraviolet radiation which can leave burns and is produced by our sun. we are relatively safe on earth but leave our atmosphere and well good luck. when the astronauts came back they were quarantined and examined and all of them got a clean bill of health. imagine that! they spent extensive time in a highly dangerous environment and no damaging effects to their health! Amazing! since it went so well in 1969 why aren’t people in the 21st century living on the moon in domed cities or at least scientists living on a base on the moon? i thought it is completely safe and quite easy to get to the moon? all you have to do is fire off a rocket and head to the big gray ball in orbit around earth and if you are going too fast just hit the brakes like we do in our car so we don’t over shoot the moon but even if you do over shoot the moon just turn your space steering wheel and you can get right back to the moon. isn’t it that easy? oh yeah i forgot about all the fuel you need to make any changes in trajectory but fuel isn’t important and we figured out how to get all that extra weight off the earth even though the Saturn V rocket wasn’t powerful enough to get all that weight off the earth but somehow NASA did it in 1969 yet NASA forgot how they did it because we can’t do it now. someone at NASA wrote all the info down on a napkin and it got thrown out. to all those who claim that the Russians would call hoax, well the US knew that Russia did a little hoaxing themselves. it has been long believed that Yuri Alekseyevich Gagarin was the first man in space. no he was about the 9th or 10th man in space. In fact he might not have actually flown in space at all but was the figure head cosmonaut who was given credit probably because he was very personable and reasonably good looking. You see what the russians didn’t want the world to know is that the first 8 cosmonauts failed to either get into orbit meaning the rocket blew up or they came back dead. what the Ruskies learned through trial and error was that if you go higher than low earth orbit you get exposure to deadly radiation, ultraviolet radiation and so forth. the cosmonauts that perished could have died from flaws in the capsule that Russian scientists weren’t aware of until it is put into use. these men and also women gave their lives in the pursuit of space exploration. Unfortunately their names didn’t become known worldwide
    because if their deaths were publically known, there would have been public outcry, and rightfully so. However, risk is part of the territory when it comes to trying something never done before. Like going to the moon. How could NASA pull off something so risky and not only did it go well the first time out of the gate but went well everytime they sent men except in the case of Apollo 13 which interestingly enough was at the time viewership was at its lowest. people were actually getting bored with watching another moon launch and often complained if their favorite tv show was interrupted to show a moon launch. NASA needed to get viewers back so they concocted the Apollo 13 disaster. quite the coincidence that it was number 13, hmmm. so you see getting the ruskies to go along with not saying anything is not too difficult because the whole US vs USSR was/is a fabrication. US scientists and Russian scientists would often, like all the time, share information between each other. The whole “Soviets are our enemy” is put on to fool the public into thinking we have a mortal enemy and we need defense spending and we need to beat them in a space race. there never in fact was a space race. it was kept hidden from the public but the US and USSR did joint missions together to Mars in 65, i believe it was, and there is even a base on mars. there’s two sides to NASA. the public side that shows us doing these small steps like sending unmanned probes and so forth and then there is the other side which uses technology obtained from crashed ufos and tech given to us by extraterrestrials. there is a US space fleet consisting of these cigar shaped vessels that are modified so that humans like us can operate them. aliens use their minds to operate their ships but since out minds aren’t as advanced yet, we have to use controls that are more rudimentary, like switches, levers, etc. the russians too are aware of these beings and information they obtain is shared with US scientists and US scientists share info with russian scientists. I would also imagine most of the major nations on earth are involved which includes the Chinese. that’s why in recent pictures taken of the moon by other nations you see what is supposed to be things left behind by Apollo astronauts. the photos are altered and things are added to them or removed from them before the pictures go public. it has to do with governments fearing that if the public knew of the existence of aliens that chaos would happen, the stock markets would crash and the economy of the world would be in ruins. also add to that, that the public now would be pissed that the government kept this secret from us for all these decades and that our government sold us out so that the government could make a deal with the aliens to get alien tech. President Eisenhower created a treaty with the aliens so that the US government could get it’s hands on alien tech and in this deal the aliens could abduct people from earth to run tests on (i believe to measure toxicity in our bodies and use us to create hybrids and other reasons unknown to me), but according to the treaty the person must be returned alive to earth. another reason to not tell the public is simple: greed. if people knew that aliens have technology hundreds of years more advanced then the public would demand that it be used to provide free electricity, free food, free you name it. those that make money off of those industries would lose a lot of money. besides greed the reason could be that the introduction of advanced technology could have a disastrous effect on earth, well, at least its economy. jobs eliminated would cause many to not have income. if you don’t need to generate electricity you don’t need a power plant and you don’t need the workers. if you can create food from thin air, you don’t need farms or its employees. if you can travel from one place on earth to another in the blink of an eye then you don’t need airlines and you get the idea. people wonder why is it all kept secret and that’s the reason why. people also wonder how is it all kept secret, well if i know and i’m telling you, then it’s not exactly a secret. little by little secrets find a way of coming out and it’s like the moon hoax, it starts with one person and grows. to claim that too many people were involved with the moon landings and that many people couldn’t possibly keep a secret, well you are right, that many can’t because we are talking about it now. it only takes one person to give up a secret and here we are now talking about it and how many websites are dedicated to showing how the moon landing was a hoax. the photos and films supposedly taken on the moon show the evidence too. besides shadow lengths not matching up there are also backgrounds from different apollo missions that look identical yet are supposed to be hundreds of miles away from each other. what are the odds of the rocky mountains looking like the appalachian mountains? the same of the odds of one crater looking exactly like another crater on the moon, astronomically impossible. if we could only land men on the side of the moon with light then why can’t we see the remains of the landing sites in real time with an observatory on earth or the hubble telescope. you would think if NASA really wants to put the hoax discussion to rest then point a high powered telescope to the moon that let’s see the footprints of the men who supposedly went there. not photos, not video but real time with telescopes. NASA says its impossible to use an observatory to see the landing sights and that the Hubble can’t do it either. so the Hubble can see distant galaxies trillions of miles away but can’t see the moon’s surface? no NASA isn’t hiding anything at all (that was sarcastic in case you couldn’t tell).

  • Alastair J. Archibald

    The first thing the ever-analytical Neil did when he dropped onto the pad was to make sure he could jump back up and onto the ladder.

    This almost immediately after a nail-biting landing where the computer picked a bad landing spot, Armstrong had to take manual control of the descent, the computer kept glitching with executive stack overloads, and they almost ran out of fuel.

    To echo Red Dwarf, “what a guy!”

  • Lenda Rovit

    Hello!!! i can never forget to appreciate what The Great Dr bello has done in my life for helping me to cure my HIV disease with herbs, he is the only herbalist doctor that i know can cure different diseases he cured my friend Jesse from Cancer, and many people from diseases, i was suffering from hiv for a long time, i have tried several medications non could cure it, until i met a testimony concerning him how he have been curing diseases of all kids like Cancer, Diabetes, Stomach Ulcers, and many more, he helped me out and now am healthy. i just want you all to join me appreciate him for my life and my friend’s life> if in case you need his assistant to cure any kind of disease just contact him through this email, bellospelltemple@gmail.com or +2348147271779.

  • SteveinAZ

    My parents woke me up to see the moon walk. I was 8 years old and really sleepy. The video sucked, but I was happy to see it. Then, I went back to bed. 😮

  • Michael J. Fox Decoteau

    i guess apollo 18 is fake.


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


See More

Collapse bottom bar