Welcome to the Anthropocene, the First Human Epoch

By Nathaniel Scharping | August 30, 2016 12:11 pm
NASA image acquired April 18 - October 23, 2012 This image of the United States of America at night is a composite assembled from data acquired by the Suomi NPP satellite in April and October 2012. The image was made possible by the new satellite’s “day-night band” of the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS), which detects light in a range of wavelengths from green to near-infrared and uses filtering techniques to observe dim signals such as city lights, gas flares, auroras, wildfires, and reflected moonlight. “Nighttime light is the most interesting data that I’ve had a chance to work with,” says Chris Elvidge, who leads the Earth Observation Group at NOAA’s National Geophysical Data Center. “I’m always amazed at what city light images show us about human activity.” His research group has been approached by scientists seeking to model the distribution of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels and to monitor the activity of commercial fishing fleets. Biologists have examined how urban growth has fragmented animal habitat. Elvidge even learned once of a study of dictatorships in various parts of the world and how nighttime lights had a tendency to expand in the dictator’s hometown or province. Named for satellite meteorology pioneer Verner Suomi, NPP flies over any given point on Earth's surface twice each day at roughly 1:30 a.m. and p.m. The polar-orbiting satellite flies 824 kilometers (512 miles) above the surface, sending its data once per orbit to a ground station in Svalbard, Norway, and continuously to local direct broadcast users distributed around the world. Suomi NPP is managed by NASA with operational support from NOAA and its Joint Polar Satellite System, which manages the satellite's ground system. NASA Earth Observatory image by Robert Simmon, using Suomi NPP VIIRS data provided courtesy of Chris Elvidge (NOAA National Geophysical Data Center). Suomi NPP is the result of a partnership between NASA, NOAA, and t

(Credit: NASA/Wikimedia Commons)

This week, at the 35th International Geologic Conference in South Africa, members of a working group recommended that the Anthropocene be officially recognized as the latest geologic epoch. This would mark a transition from the Holocene, which began almost 12,000 years ago at the end of the last Ice Age, and the beginning of the “age of humans.”

Living in the Human Age

The term “Anthropocene” was popularized in 2000 by atmospheric scientist Paul Crutzen to refer to the unprecedented rate of environmental change occurring in the age of man. Since then, proponents have argued that humanity is altering the Earth to such a degree that our influence will be discernible millions of years from now.

The term has seen widespread usage, but has not yet been formally recognized by the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS), the body that rules on the geological time scale. The Working Group on the Anthropocene (AWG), a subset of the IUGS, published a paper last year that summarized the majority opinion of the group: conditions that defined the Holocene have changed enough that the Earth has entered a new epoch.

For the Anthropocene to gain epoch status, geologists must prove that it has left a mark on Earth’s skin. For example, the end-Cretaceous extinction that wiped out the dinosaurs stands out clearly as a thin line of iridium etched into the rock.

Today, it’s not an asteroid that’s precipitating global changes, it’s us. While the evidence of climate change is clear on the surface, it’s harder to see the effects on a geologic level. For something to appear in the very bedrock of the Earth, it needs to cause changes at a fundamental level. Like rings on a tree, geologists look to the varying strata of Earth’s bedrock to piece together the planet’s history. Now, for the first time, we are looking at the rock and seeing evidence of ourselves.

Various papers have identified telltale markers of human intervention, including fly ash from the Industrial Revolution, pesticides in the soil, changing levels of carbon dioxide in ice cores and increasing rates of species extinction; but the sign that will likely hold up best is radioactive material.

shutterstock_339956981

The BAKER test of Operation Crossroads, July 25, 1946. (Credit: Everett Historical)

Beginning in the 1950s and ending in 1980, atmospheric tests of thermonuclear devices spread radioactive elements like uranium and plutonium around the world. These elements are distinctly unnatural and will be visible for millions of years in sediments the world over. In addition, they correspond to a relatively narrow band of time, making stratigraphic dating more precise. This measure would put the beginning of the Anthropocene around the middle of the 20th century.

Humanity Leaving Its Mark

It’s important to remember that the beginning of the Anthropocene does not correspond the first measurable indications of human activity. Rather, it is the first point at which human activity shows up in the stratigraphic record.

While artifacts of our civilization may date further back, our epoch begins when human activities first appear in the layer of rock beneath us — what’s called a golden spike.

This method of dating turns the geologic process on its head, says Jan Zalasiewicz, a researcher at the University of Leicester and AWG member. Instead of looking back through the layers of rock and piecing together the story of the Earth, researchers are now looking to the sediment for evidence to confirm a theory. And, they found it.

“This is not some speculative thing that might happen, we’re talking about what has already happened and where there’s already a record,” says Peter Haff, a geophysics professor at Duke University, also a member of the AWG.

“Moreover, if humanity were to disappear today, the changes that have already been wrought on the surface of the earth are sufficiently large that even a million, a hundred million years from now, if somebody looked back … they would see that there was some serious change in how the Earth functions, and it happened right about this point in time,” he says.

The last epoch, the Holocene, lasted 11,000 years. The two before that lasted 2.5 million years. The epoch before those two went on for almost 20 million years. It used to take a long time for the planet to undergo momentous shifts that are captured in layers of rock.

That we’ve shifted epochs in a fraction of the time implies significant and long-lasting changes have occurred in only a few thousand years of human civilization.

 

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Environment, top posts
ADVERTISEMENT
  • OWilson

    Of course!

    See Anthropocentrism – Wiki

    Everything important of major happens in their own particular lifetime!

    Only fair they should have their own Epoch!

    (See also Kardashians, Milennials, Narcisism, LGTB, Clintons)

    • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm Uncle Al

      Bruce/Kaitlyn Jenner – Anthropocene marker extraordinaire!

      • CB

        “Bruce/Kaitlyn Jenner – Anthropocene marker extraordinaire!”

        No, Al.

        Caitlyn Jenner is not actually a marker of the Anthropocene.

        Nice try, though.

        (Washington Post, “Earth is on brink of a sixth mass extinction, scientists say, and it’s humans’ fault”, Sarah Kaplan June 22, 2015)

        • OWilson

          Always on the brink!

          The Washing Post says so! :) :)

          Their “Tipping Points” come and go like Barbra Streisand retirement parties. :)

          Always a bridesmaid, never a bride!

          • CB

            “Always on the brink!”

            A fair criticism!

            We are not “on the brink” of Earth’s 6th extinction event, we are in it… and it’s only going to get worse.

            “Pimm says conservationists can calculate the extinction rate of the known species by keeping track of how many die out each year… Applying the same statistical approach to extinction data revealed a rate of 100 to 1,000 species lost per million per year, mostly due to human-caused habitat destruction and climate change… That analysis revealed that before humans evolved, less than a single species per million went extinct annually.”

            (National Geographic, “Species Extinction Happening 1,000 Times Faster Because of Humans?”, Christine Dell’Amore)

          • OWilson

            See National Geographic December 1977 Major articles on Global Cooling!

            They are in the business to sell magazines. You knew that didn’t you?

            That’s why they used to photograph naked women and children in Africa.

            (Not white folks) :)

            For their faithful readers like you! :)

          • CB

            “See National Geographic December 1977 Major articles on Global Cooling!”

            Why, sweetheart?

            If you know that repeating dishonest Climate Denier talking points like the one you just repeated marks you as someone who is untrustworthy, why did you bother?

            Do you not want people to take you seriously?

            “There was no scientific consensus in the 1970s that the Earth was headed into an imminent ice age. Indeed, the possibility of anthropogenic warming dominated the peer-reviewed literature even then.”

            (“The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus”, Peterson et al, American Meteorological Society, 8 February 2008)

  • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm Uncle Al

    Site-censored Anthropocene markers are 1) the massive C-14 spike from nuclear testing and especially the 99.9+% thermonuclear fusion Tsar Bomba, 2) Sudden appearance of plastic debris in ocean sediment, 3) Lead lines in Greenland ice cores (Greek and Roman lead smelting) plus copper (copper smelting, 1400 BC); lead and antimony lines (silver smelting) in Peruvian Quelccaya Ice Cap cores.

    uranium and plutonium around the world. These elements are distinctly unnatural” Stupid in general, ignorant in specific – Oklo, Gabon.

    • CB

      “Anthropocene markers are 1) the massive C-14 spike from nuclear testing”

      The massive decline in C-14 due to the burning of fossil fuel.

      “Suess (1955) demonstrated that forests grown between 1930 and 1950 had 14C values 20-40 per mil below those of pre-1890 woods as a result of anthropogenic 14C-free CO2 emissions since the Industrial Revolution.”

      (Oak Ridge National Laboratory – Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, “CARBON-14 MEASUREMENTS IN ATMOSPHERIC CO2 FROM NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE SITES, 1962-1993”)

  • John C

    It kind of puts things into perspective when you realize that, millions of years from now, the beer bottle you threw overboard while deep sea fishing that settled to the sea bed could end up being the last and most enduring bit of evidence that you ever existed.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+