TRAPPIST-1: Good News and Bad News

By John Wenz | April 6, 2017 2:55 pm

(Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech)

TRAPPIST-1 opens up an exciting field for astronomers: a small, nearby, compact planetary system with seven Mars- to Earth-size worlds orbiting in days or weeks instead of months and years. What’s more, because their star is small and cool, all the planets may be habitable.

Maybe. Two new papers are out on TRAPPIST-1. One makes the chances for life even more ripe, while the other virtually strips away all chances of habitability.

The Bad News

Let’s step back: until the last decade or so, most red dwarf or M-dwarf stars were thought to be active flaring stars, which would strip away planetary atmospheres under most accepted scenarios. But as more planets turned up in areas where planets would retain water aroudn M-dwarfs, scientists began to rethink their definition of habitability and come up with scenarios under which atmospheres and liquid water, including planets with strong magnetic fields, which is the reason we have a thick atmosphere but Mars doesn’t.

So the habitability of the TRAPPIST-1 planets would rely on a relatively calm star. That’s one of the reasons that while Proxima Centauri b is considered a gamble for true habitability, as Proxima Centauri is a very active flaring star that might endanger any planets in its violent path. And research from Hungarian planetary scientists says that TRAPPIST-1 may be swarming with flares, possibly endangering most, if not all, of the planetary atmospheres that might arise.

The researchers base their conclusion on data from the Kepler space telescope. One flare even topped the most powerful burst ever known from our Sun, known as the Carrington Event. In 1859, that flare fried telegraph infrastructure and caused aurorae events all the way down to tropical latitudes in the northern hemisphere.

That flare reached out the 93 million miles (150 million km) between the Earth and Sun. The farthest TRAPPIST-1 planet, -1h, is 5.8 million miles (9.4 million km) from TRAPPIST-1. The researchers conclude that such activity would destabilize the atmospheres of the planets. Their findings have been submitted to the Astrophysical Journal for review.

The Good News

Let’s say that maybe we’re seeing outlier events or there’s some flaw in the Hungarian data. If that’s the case and TRAPPIST-1 planets can host life, University of Chicago researchers say that the planets may instead basically share life via little planetary sneezes between the worlds.

The idea of exchanges of rocks or other objects between worlds is nothing new. Several meteorites from Mars have been found on Earth, including that mysterious Mars rock that may hold ancient martian bacteria. It means that if there were life on Mars, it might not be vastly different than that of Earth.

At closest approach, or opposition, Earth and Mars are about 34 million miles (55 million km) apart. That’s quite a distance for a rock to travel, yet it clearly happens.

Now imagine this: the TRAPPIST planets are about an Earth-Moon distance apart at opposition. The Earth-Moon distance is 238,000 miles (383,000) km at perigee. There are seven worlds to work with, three in an especially temperate area of the habitable zone. Transport between those seven worlds could essentially result in shared biology across three or seven worlds, all with simple transport of materials taking place in relatively short spans of time. The researchers estimate some rocks could transport between worlds in 10 to 80 years.

What’s more, any impact that kicks up rocks would transport 45-60 percent of materials beyond its world’s reach, rather than falling back down. 20-40 percent of that material may fall onto other planets in the narrower habitable zone of three planets.

Their research has been accepted into the Astrophysical Journal Letters, and a preprint is available here — though as a caveat, some numbers may change after the paper has been fully refereed.

But either article opens up some lines of study for TRAPPIST. So take your pick … peril or panspermia paradise?

This article originally appeared in

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Space & Physics, top posts
MORE ABOUT: exoplanets
  • OWilson

    Speculating on finding an Earth like planet is fun, but fundamentally unsatisfying. We need evidence of life, the Holy Grail.

    Under many cosmological scenarios (the Big Bang theory has many problems) It is likely that there are an infinite number of stars with an infinite number of planets, so an infinite number of Earth-like planets are likely.

    Our problem is locating one close to our neighborhood, within our relative infinitesimal search area that has all the unique multiple features to support life. And also to protect life, with the magic interplay of the Sun and Earth’s magnetic fields.

    We would be more likely to discover evidence of life first, then find it’s home.

    60 years of unsuccessful SETI signal searching is showing us how rare life is, and we are probably doomed to speculation, until that great Mother Ship comes and takes us all away to Oz.

    • Chubbee

      As far as we know, there has been life on this planet for 3.5 billion years, yet, once again as far as we know, a technological civilization has only existed for the last century or so.
      A century from now I wouldn’t be surprised to see “radio wave” tech go the way of the dodo.
      So to assume that life is rare, judging by a radio wave search of a mere 60 years, is in my opinion, jumping to conclusions to say the least.
      This article doesn’t sat how far away this system is.
      It’s kind of annoying when they tell us how they found a planet that may support life and then you find out that the system is some ludicrous distance of hundreds of light years away.
      Tell me about something in our neighborhood that we would have some chance of at least sending a probe to that we could here back from in a couple of generations.

      • OWilson

        We know that life “evolves” and if life is there, it has survived all catastrophe.

        At some level of evolution, that life would pass through the communications stage (EMF), and like us would reach out with these signals, so the most productive way for us to search is by our current technology.

        So until we have something new to probe with, we are stuck with your “annoying” speculation! :)

        • Chubbee

          And your annoying pessimism? Life is almost a certainty. The timescales involved coupled with the distances make the chances of SETI’s catching a signal remote.

          • OWilson

            Speculation about the unknown is always fun and productive, and very democratic.

            A clean slate on which to paint possible scenarios

            Look up at the night sky and wonder!

            (What is annoying are the smiling arrogant “experts” telling us exactly what happened one trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second after some miraculous “Big Bang”. :)

  • Uncle Al

    Sustaining life is no problem – recoverable living bacteria within compressed hot rock of the deepest South African gold mines (DOI: 10.1126/science.1127376). Finding something that plays cribbage may not obtain in Inner Cities.

    • Tom Stephens

      Generating revenue via the internet is just as uncomplicated (or maybe as problematical) quite as creating wealth offline. Even though hundreds of Making money over the internet entrepreneurs guarantee to have got a undisclosed procedure to generate immediate profit, the simple truth is, there is absolutely no opportunity anybody can emerge as rich within hours just by clicking a button or simply shopping for numerous handbook. Earning money on line needs to have some hard work and perseverance. If you happen to be capable of input the amount of time and work into it, you will find methods to creating extra cash flow via internet.I am being paid $10000 or perhaps more month to month from this task.Here’s the secret to make more money although the others are long term home money making ideas >>>>> GET.LC/S95Gz

  • Lee Chapman

    If one of those planets does not have a “huge moon” like our does then it does not have life.



Briefing you on the must-know news and trending topics in science and technology today.

See More


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar