A First Attempt to Edit Genes Inside the Body

By Nathaniel Scharping | November 15, 2017 4:50 pm
(Credit: Creations/Shutterstock)

(Credit: Creations/Shutterstock)

For the first time, doctors have attempted to edit a man’s genes inside his body.

The patient is 44-year-old Brian Madeux, who suffers from a rare genetic disease that has left him progressively more debilitated over the course of his life. His liver can’t produce an enzyme necessary for breaking down a type of carbohydrate, something researchers hope to repair with a gene-editing technique called zinc-finger nucleases (ZFN).

Gene Repair

Through an IV, billions of copies of a harmless virus loaded with instructions for two ZFN proteins and a gene to produce the correct enzyme were delivered to Madeux’s bloodstream. The virus was programmed to insert itself just into liver cells to ensure that it didn’t begin to edit anywhere else. Once a cell has been implanted with the virus, it begins to make copies of the ZFN proteins and the correct gene. The two proteins then cut apart the DNA at a specific point and insert the therapeutic gene, after which the cell’s natural repair mechanisms bind the double helix back together and the gene can get to work.

Researchers have edited genes in human cells before but always in a dish, in the lab. This is the first time a gene-editing technology has been injected into a patient’s body and allowed to get to work.

Madeux won’t know if the gene therapy worked for at least a month, and tests can confirm its effectiveness in three months, the Associated Press reports. At 44, he is already older than many patients with Hunter’s disease, the condition that has plagued him since birth. Not easily diagnosed in newborns, the disease begins to appear as a rash of ear infections and colds, but can go on to cause skeletal deformities, mental deficiencies, heart and lung problems, joint pain and other symptoms. Those with severe forms of the disease usually die by age 15 without treatment, says Chester Whitley, a University of Minnesota researcher organizing clinical trials of the gene therapy treatment.

Infusions of the missing enzyme can help, and bone marrow transplants can also partially replace the missing enzyme, but the infusions are expensive and bone marrow transplants can be dangerous. In any case, neither method seems to treat the cognitive effects of the disease.

Another Option

Using gene editing to give patients a permanent, working copy of the mutated gene is a much better option. The ZFN technique the researchers used was developed by California-based Sangamo Therapeutics, and is an alternative to the more well known CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technique. ZFN is based on zinc-finger proteins common in our bodies that help to turn genes on and off by binding to them. Sangamo modified these proteins to find specific points on the genome and then added another enzyme which does the actual cutting. They’ve previously used the technique to edit genes in search of an HIV cure, although that trial took place outside the body.

The precision that the method enables cuts down on the probability that so-called “off-target effects” will occur — harmful side effects caused when the wrong genes get edited, says Whitley. The researchers were careful to find a place on the genome where inserting a new gene wouldn’t cause any problems, in this case, the gene for albumin, another type of liver protein.

“It’s going to go to a very safe place, the albumin gene, it’s not going to cause cancer if it goes there, it’s not going to disrupt any other activity,” says Whitley. “That’s why we call it a safe harbor.”

Previous gene-therapy techniques have taken more of a “shotgun” approach, he says, which sometimes leads to the gene being inserted at the wrong location. This could be harmful, such as the case of five patients in the 1990s who contracted lymphoma as a result of a gene therapy that interfered with a cancer-causing gene. New gene editing technologies, CRISPR included, allow for more precision.

CRISPR hasn’t yet been approved for use inside humans by the FDA, though. ZFN was approved for clinical trials based on tests of safety that CRISPR has yet to pass, though it likely will in the future. It’s partly because the ZFN proteins target more DNA base pairs, the “letters” that make up our genome, allowing it to be more precise, says Ed Conner, chief medical officer at Sangamo. That precision, along with the technique’s efficiency at carrying out edits, is what allowed them to move forward with a test of their technique in a living human.

The therapy will likely not alleviate Madeux’s symptoms, but it will hopefully stop the progression of the condition. In the future, Whitley hopes to use the technique on much younger patients before their symptoms have a chance to develop very far. The clinical tests he’s currently overseeing will be an important step toward establishing safety and effectiveness of the technique and could lead to its use in younger patients in the future.

Tests with mice indicate that the gene therapy is able to clear the build-up of carbohydrates that characterizes the disease from organs. Additionally, the therapeutic enzyme begins to appear in the blood, and, most, excitingly, the mice have even shown cognitive improvements, Whitley says.

 

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Health & Medicine, top posts
MORE ABOUT: genes & health
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Erik Bosma

    I’d like to order a CRISPR done on my telomeres, please. They’re unraveling a little faster than I’d like.

  • Sage_on_the_Hudson

    “The patient is 44-year-old Brian Madeux, who suffers from a rare genetic disease that has left him progressively more debilitated…”

    “Progressively more” is redundant.

  • yewdontsay

    Second story I’ve seen on this new development. Much better written and more informative that the other. Can’t wait to see this used vs. cancer –anybody got some p53? And in PFIC…etc., etc… Well done story. Thanks!

  • DW

    In Brian Madeux case, this approach might be an adequate solution for the long-run. I couldn’t believe that a virus, that is injected into the bloodstream, would find its target cell and precisely edit genes without causing mutations that lead to other negative effects. Apparently, these researchers have developed a virus that has been programed to only enter liver cells, and have studied the genome to find a “safe harbor”. However, this points out that gene therapy is highly specific and we are barely scratching the surface; starting with the first clinical trial for one particular set of virus, ZFN and therapeutic gene to hopefully cure the Hunter’s disease.

    I think gene editing in general is a groundbreaking and very important technique in science. However, I think we should tread carefully in this area. Where do we draw the line? GMO foods? Gene manipulated people? A new class of “perfect people?” In the end, just because you can, doesn’t always mean you should. Especially because, given that proper legislation will always trail behind groundbreaking discoveries, the potential for misuse is always a factor that needs to be considered. I think there will always be a fine line between science and technology, resulting in a huge discussion about bioethics.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

D-brief

Briefing you on the must-know news and trending topics in science and technology today.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar
+