Einstein Proven Right Even In Other Galaxies

By Bill Andrews | June 21, 2018 1:53 pm
Galaxy NGC 3344 (Credit: NASA/ESA)

Galaxy NGC 3344 (Credit: NASA/ESA)

Albert Einstein’s name is synonymous with intelligence, but he’s more than earned his rep. The man revolutionized physics when he was in his 20s and 30s. He came up with a whole new way of understanding reality, not as a fixed grid against which events occur, but as fundamentally intertwined with time and perception. Trying to prove Einstein wrong, somehow, is a perennial goal of budding and experienced physicists alike.

Well, they’ll have to keep trying. A new study in Science today shows that Einstein was so good, even in distant galaxies he’s still right.

Warp Zone

It all has to do with general relativity, Einstein’s theory of gravity, which posits that anything with mass warps the fabric of spacetime. The bigger the mass, the more the very universe deforms around it. This explains why massive objects attract less massive objects: they’re just following spacetime’s curves. Light also follows the warps and wefts created by gravity — black holes and galaxies literally bend light around them.

Sometimes, when massive enough objects line up just right, they can actually focus more distant light like a glass lens in a telescope, with the bends in spacetime acting as a kind of “gravitational lens.”

And while these are useful in studying those ultra-distant objects emitting that warped light, they can also serve as a “laboratory” for testing relativity itself.

Relatively Straightforward

That’s important, because even though scientists have confirmed Einstein’s general relativity within the solar system, that’s still small potatoes compared to the larger universe. As the paper’s authors write, “the long-range nature of gravity is still poorly constrained.” So they found a way to use a nearby gravitational lens around galaxy ESO 325-GOO4 to test out relativity on the galactic scale.

First, the team measured just how much the galaxy was warping spacetime, using Hubble data of the area. This allowed them to derive the galaxy’s mass. Then, they calculated the mass a different way, by observing stellar movement, this time using data from the Very Large Telescope in Chile. If Einstein was right, the two figures should be about the same.

Spoiler alert: Einstein was right. The ratio between the two values was 0.97 ± 0.09, which is pretty darn close to the predicted value of 1.

This is great news not just for Einstein worshippers, but anybody who wants to understand what’s going on in the universe at large scales. The finding rules out many alternative theories of gravity, and confirms that even at large scales general relativity holds true. It also means we have to keep around the notion of dark energy — the still mysterious force propelling the universe to expand faster and faster — since it’s (partly) a consequence of general relativity.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Space & Physics
MORE ABOUT: cosmology, Einstein, physics
ADVERTISEMENT
  • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/EquivPrinFail.pdf Uncle Al

    Rigorously derived GR and QM are 15 decimal places exact, prediction versus observation. Founding postulates are indefensible or they need not be postulated. Test to falsify postulates, not to validate predictions. GR and QM risk common mode failure.

    1) Big Bang baryogenesis – matter in excess of antimatter.
    2) Sakharov conditions – vacuum is ~0.1 ppb chiral anisotropic.
    3) Given trace left foot vacuum, tightly fitting extreme opposite shoes embed with different energies. GR- and QM-postulated exact vacuum symmetries can be falsified.

    Blow a 3:1 enantiomeric excess of an extreme chiral divergent, polar, prolate top organic molecule into a Brightspec rotational microwave spectrometer. Chiral vacuum breaks embedded shoes’ mirror degeneracy. A 3:1 lopsided spectral line falsifies GR and QM, kills SUSY, sources Milgrom acceleration versus dark matter. One hour, 40,000:1 signal to noise.

    Blow a single enantiomer chiral molecule with no racemization path through a diffraction grating. Hund’s paradox is nulled by dissipation collapsing wavefunctions. The molecule(‘s wavefunction) passes through all slits simultaneously without dissipation. The molecules racemize or do not diffract, or QM is falsified.

    www(.)mazepath(.)com/uncleal/D3QMGR.png
    … Extreme chiral divergent, polar, prolate top organic molecules. Look.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

D-brief

Briefing you on the must-know news and trending topics in science and technology today.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+