Mandatory Labels Lessened Vermont’s Fear Of GMOs

By Eric Betz | June 27, 2018 5:09 pm
A new study suggests GMO opposition dropped in Vermont following a mandatory GMO labeling law. (Credit: Sally McCay, University of Vermont)

A new study suggests GMO opposition dropped in Vermont following a mandatory GMO labeling law. (Sally McCay, University of Vermont)

Scientists and food companies have long worried that GMO labels on food will be viewed like the warnings on cigarettes and alcohol — an admission that the product is unhealthy.

Many anti-GMO advocates — beyond pushing for transparency — thought labels might hurt sales and force corporations to back off genetically engineered foods.

It turns out, in Vermont at least, they were both wrong.

Vermont is the only U.S. state with a mandatory labeling policy, which went into effect in 2016. And a new analysis by researchers at the University of Vermont shows that opposition to GMO foods has fallen 19 percent since the law went into effect.

The study was published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances.

GMO Battle

Their results are a strange turn in the long-fought battle over forcing food companies to put GMO labels on their products. Scientific studies have repeatedly shown that genetically engineered foods are safe. However, consumers also largely support transparency with respect to GMOs.

“We’re finding that both in real-world and hypothetical studies, the introduction of a simple disclosure label can actually improve consumer attitudes toward these technologies,” University of Vermont applied economist Jane Kolodinsky said in a media release. “In a state that has been such a hot bed for GMO opposition, to see this change is striking.” She’s tracked the state’s attitudes toward GMOs since 2003.

For their latest study, Kolodinsky’s group conducted nearly 8,000 phone and online surveys where residents gave a 1 to 5 ranking for their support of GMO foods before and after the law. They also asked Americans outside Vermont for comparison.

Nationwide GMO Labels

The study couldn’t say for sure why Vermonters had a change of heart, but the authors offered a guess:

“The findings are consistent with previous research suggesting that labels give consumers a sense of control, which has been shown to be related to risk perception.” In essence, people could be thinking the labels indicate companies have nothing to hide, thus boosting confidence.

These results come as the U.S. Department of Agriculture considers a new federal rule that would force foods to carry GMO labels nationwide. The USDA is accepting public comments on that change through July 3.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Environment, Technology, top posts
ADVERTISEMENT
  • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/EquivPrinFail.pdf Uncle Al

    Teosinte grass seed was stored in copper (alloy) vessels. Moisture mobilized copper ions that catalytically oxidatively scissioned DNA. The GMO result was….corn.

    Ban corn until unknown hazards are fully assessed.

  • Swami_Binkinanda

    The take home lesson is that if you act shady you will be perceived as shady. If you are forthcoming and appear to operate in good faith you will gain trust. Trust is a teacup that fills up by the teaspoonful but empties all at once.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

D-brief

Briefing you on the must-know news and trending topics in science and technology today.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+