Scientists Have Measured All the Photons Ever Produced in the Observable Universe

By Chelsea Gohd | November 29, 2018 4:16 pm
Clemson University astrophysicist Marco Ajello enjoys a spectacular view of the stars on Nov. 20 at the Clemson Outdoor Lab. (Credit: Pete Martin / Clemson University)

Astrophysicist Marco Ajello at the Clemson Outdoor Lab. (Credit: Pete Martin/Clemson University)

Astrophysicists estimate that our universe formed about 13.7 billion years ago, with the first stars forming when the universe was just a few hundred million years old. By peering back at the earliest days of stellar creation, scientists in South Carolina have measured all of the starlight ever produced throughout the entire history of the observable universe.

Scientists have been working to obtain this measure, also known as extragalactic background light (EBL) or “cosmic fog,” for a long time. “The EBL represents the book reporting the story of stellar activity and galaxy evolution within the universe,” Marco Ajello, lead researcher and astrophysicist at Clemson College of Science in South Carolina, said in an email.


Measuring EBL could be a great tool for scientists, helping them to better understand galaxy evolution, stellar formation processes, and how the universe has evolved, Ajello explained. But, until now, scientists haven’t been able to make this measurement because EBL is much dimmer than the Milky Way and other light in the night sky. Scientists were not able to observe far away galaxies because they were too dim and brighter light in the foreground further obscured this view. Now, by using an indirect method, scientists have finally made this measurement.

The team found that the amount of starlight, or the number of photons (particles of visible light) that stars have emitted throughout the history of the observable universe is 4×10^84 photons. Or, alternatively, 4,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 photons.

An Indirect Measurement

The team was able to make this stellar measurement by observing blazars, or galaxies with supermassive black holes emitting beams of matter and radiation in our direction, using NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope.

“By using blazars at different distances from us, we measured the total starlight at different time periods. We measured the total starlight of each epoch — one billion years ago, two billion years ago, six billion years ago, etc. — all the way back to when stars were first formed. This allowed us to reconstruct the EBL and determine the star-formation history of the universe in a more effective manner than had been achieved before,” Vaidehi Paliya, a co-author and postdoctoral fellow who analyzed almost nine years of relevant data, said in a statement.

Blazars emit jets of energetic particles which include gamma-rays, or ultra-energetic photons. And gamma rays emitted from blazars travel through the cosmic fog (EBL), which is made up of visible and ultraviolet starlight. When gamma rays collide with visible light, they turn into pairs of electrons and positrons. “In effect, the process dampens the gamma ray signal in much the same way as fog dims a distant lighthouse,” NASA stated in a press release about the phenomenon. These collisions leave visible imprints that scientists can observe using Fermi.

“By measuring how many photons have been absorbed, we were able to measure how thick the fog was and also measure, as a function of time, how much light there was in the entire range of wavelengths,” Ajello said in the statement.

By mapping the varying densities of this cosmic fog, the researchers were able to observe extremely far (and therefore, extremely old) starlight because these collisions happen over great distances. This technique also worked because, by indirectly observing the starlight through the interactions between gamma rays and visible light, the technique isn’t obscured or impeded by bright foreground light.

“The first billion years of our universe’s history are a very interesting epoch that has not yet been probed by current satellites. Our measurement allows us to peek inside it. Perhaps one day we will find a way to look all the way back to the Big Bang. This is our ultimate goal,” Ajello concluded in the statement.

The researchers published their work today in the journal Science.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Space & Physics, top posts
  • Joanne T. Gregory

    Do you really just remember the car you always wanted to spend money on as well as the home you really loved the a lot ? All of us have certain items in our everyday living which we would like to achieve . We do a lot of work towards it . In spite of everything usually we miss out, but certainly not ever again . This excellent on the net opportunity made in the best way that it contributes greatly you to definitely make money remarkably worthy income . Do the job each day and give your tasks few hrs and receive as much as $36000 per week . It gives you opportunity to operate in your home space with very flexible time . You could be your very own boss . It is really a life changer online opportunity which can help you to ultimately attain exactly what you wish in your lifetime . So now go and also check , great things waiting around for you >>> PREVENE.TUMBLR.COM

  • Uncle Al

    Does 21 cm microwave count? Oh wait, 1,420,405,751.7667 Hz.

  • OWilson

    “Current observations suggest that the Universe is about 13.7 billion years old” – NASA

    Which implies our expanding universe has an “edge”.

    By co-incidence, our most powerful telescopes can see objects that far, in every direction. Putting us squarely in the center of the whole deal :)

    Anthropocentic hubris?

    If the next generation of telescopes will see even further, will they see nothing, or just more of same?

    • b l

      No, it doesn’t imply an edge, or that we are in the center. It’s weird physics at work.
      Imagine you are a spot on a balloon, at a random place, and the balloon is covered with spots. You look around, and you see other spots. As the balloon is inflated, you see all the other spots fly away from you- it looks like you are in the “middle” but you know it is only a trick of your own perspective. Still, by calculating from the speed at which the spots are flying away from you, you can determine how long it has been since the balloon began inflating. That is what the scientists do.
      A little more complicated: Since we can calculate the age, and we know the speed of light, we know that we will never see anything from a greater distance than the distance from which light traveled since the beginning. Back to the balloon analog. Imagine that you have calculated, based on analysis of your moving spots, that the balloon has been inflating for exactly one hour. One hour ago, the balloon was as small as it could be, just a tiny speck, all the spots together. Imagine also that light moves very slow, that as you looked out at the spots, the further the spot, the older the view. A far away spot looks like it did half an hour ago. Further, 3/4 hour. But… you could never see a spot from more than an hour ago- there were no spots out there to see, there was no balloon out there. No matter how hard you tried, you would not see the spots before the balloon began to inflate.

      • OWilson

        Thanks for the comment.

        Since they tell us we are looking back in time, in all directions, and our view presently extends to about the same 13.7 billion years, then the next generation telescopes are a waste of money, because we cannot see anything that existed prior to the 13.7 or so billion years the universe has existed.

        Nothing can exist beyond its creation date.

        A paradox?

        • b l

          It’s true we cannot ever see back before 13.7 billion years in time, but, we can see those early events *better* with better equipment.

          • OWilson

            If that is true would we not be looking at the high density singularity, instead of galaxies in every direction as far as the telescopes can see?

            The “balloon” and “plum pudding” analogies don’t help.


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


See More

Collapse bottom bar