Compressed Air in Underground Rocks Could Be the Next Batteries

By Bill Andrews | January 22, 2019 2:50 pm
north sea energy

Researchers are pushing for a new kind of energy storage based on compressed air. Using renewable energy, the tech would pump air into underground rocks in the North Sea, and it would power turbines when released. (Credit; NASA)

With reports about climate change becoming increasingly dire, it’s increasingly important to find an eco-friendly way to not only generate energy, but also store it. After all, wind turbines and solar power and the like don’t run steadily. So we can’t just stick that extra energy in a bottle to use when the wind dies down and the sun sets.

Only no, that’s almost exactly what a group of Scottish scientists is proposing. Except, in this case, the bottle is a layer of porous rocks deep within the sea bed, and the energy comes from compressed air. You simply use your renewable energy source to compress and store the air, and then when you need the energy again you pop the cork, so to speak, and let the escaping air drive a turbine that re-generates the electricity. (Thanks to the extreme pressures down there, the air would stay in place, and not escape on its own.)

The researchers unveiled the details behind the plan, dubbed porous media compressed air energy storage (PM-CAES), in a Nature Energy paper this week. It’s a simple-sounding mix of technologies that could seriously make a dent in a country’s energy production — and mitigate the trends that are pushing the global climate to extremes.

Compressed Air of Superiority

Currently this plan is all theoretical — the paper just runs the numbers on the idea to see if it’s at all practical. But boy, does it seem to be.

The authors specifically looked at how a PM-CAES system could work for the United Kingdom, using the sandstone deep below the waters of the North Sea. They looked at existing geological records to model the terrain, and assumed the air “wells” would be physically near to the energy sources they’d be storing — offshore wind turbines, for example.

According to the researchers, it could really work. “Our results show that PM-CAES is a potentially viable large-scale inter-seasonal electricity storage technology, crucial in power systems with over 80 percent of their generation capacity provided by renewable energy sources,” they write. “We find the potential storage capacity is equivalent to approximately 160 percent of the United Kingdom’s electricity consumption for January and February 2017 (77–96 TWh), with a roundtrip energy efficiency of 54–59 percent.”

So this system could, effectively, more than satisfy the entire country’s electrical demand during  two cold winter months, when demand is already about 25 percent higher than in the summer. And because the physical infrastructure involved is mostly just underwater rock — plus a fairly small surface plant to pump the compressed air down and bring it back up to generate electricity — PM-CAES would leave a relatively small footprint, which “would benefit regions with limited land surface or water resources” the authors write.

Solutions Needed

Of course, there’s always a catch. To get to that level of efficiency, the system would need about 7,000 new wells. That’s no small number, as the authors point out that more than 40 years of oil drilling in the North Sea has produced only about 11,000 wells. But any changes to a country’s power production requires considerable investment.

And lest you worry that it’s all sounding too impractical to carry out in real life, know that the same basic idea of storing air deep underground to turn into future electricity, is already in use: Germany and the U.S. both have CAES energy plants in place that store compressed air in old salt mines. It’s a proven technology.

If we’re going to get serious about curbing the effects of global warming, and lessening the emissions rates of our basic electrical needs, this certainly seems an approach worth considering. The authors point out more research could start selecting specific sites within the North Sea’s rocks, and that no other energy storage technology — from pumped hydro storage to classical batteries — quite works on the scale and efficiency of PM-CAES.

Basically, it’s just a matter of wanting it enough. With any luck, these geoscientists will hit rock bottom before our environment does.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Technology, top posts
MORE ABOUT: energy
  • Mike Richardson

    Fascinating. Now that’s an innovative solution to the energy storage problem from wind power. Even better that it could employ many of the same folks who formerly drilled oil wells, as their skills would be in high demand for drilling these compressed air storage wells. Hopefully the wind energy industry will begin implementing this soon to speed up the growth of clean wind power.

  • Uncle Al

    (P)(V) = energy, 101.325 J/L-atm. The proposal is thermodynamic BS coming and going: Dry the gas. Compression, transport, storage, transport, use. Feelings! and drum circles do not power the grid.

    … High pressure, high volume gas storage fiasco.

    • OWilson

      We wish them “well”, but already wind power generation has efficiency problems, and resource consuming requirements, costs, land, and yes, fossil fuels used in their manufacture, transportation, installation, maintenance, replacement and electrical grid infrastructure construction to get the energy to its ultimate consumer.

      Add the well storage and retrieval infrastructure, and you are adding to the overall existing demand for those traditional resources, and of course costs and overall efficiency.

      One should not confuse theoretical technical or scientific feasiblity with practicality.

      A good article on the inherent problems with wind power is to be found on “The Spectator – Wind Turbines are Neither Clean nor Green and they Provide Zero Global Energy”.

      Here’s a quote, “To the nearest whole number, what percentage of the world’s energy consumption was supplied by wind power in 2014, the last year for which there are reliable figures? Was it 20 per cent, 10 per cent or 5 per cent? None of the above: it was 0 per cent. That is to say, to the nearest whole number, there is still no wind power on Earth”.

      While government subsidies, and innovative and creative solutions may mitigate some of these problems you can never escape the limiting factor of The Second Law of Thermodynamics. Energy co-efficiency!

      No perpetual motion machine, and no free lunch!

      Civilization’s best bet for the future, is Nuclear Fission, possibly Nuclear Fusion, geothermal, and tidal power, where natural energy is at its greatest concentrations.

      In the meantime natural gas and other fossil fuels continue to fuel the world’s prosperity.

  • Kamran Rowshandel

    I’d rather they didn’t kill all of themselves, actually. Let’s save them from their low intelligence and destroy all their attempts to make this insane and dangerous monument to their lack of certain types of cleverness.

  • Dodgy Geezer

    What’s wrong with a simple power station? We know how to build them and run them efficiently, and they can provide power whenever it is needed. And much, much cheaper.


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


See More

Collapse bottom bar