Human brain and teeth evolution not linked — Surprise!

By Gemma Tarlach | January 2, 2017 2:00 pm
Researchers long the human brain (blue) got bigger as our teeth (eccru) got smaller, but a new study tells a different story. Credit: George Washington University.

Researchers long thought the human brain (blue) got bigger as our teeth (eccru) got smaller, but a new study tells a different story. Image courtesy of: Aida Gómez-Robles.

Sure, the human brain is a big deal, literally. But if you put the average human in a primate family reunion photo op that included our nearest living relatives, such as chimpanzees, bonobos and gorillas, and told all of them to smile wide for the camera, one thing would be very apparent: when it comes to teeth, man, we puny humans are total lightweights.

For a long time, it’s been assumed that as our brains got bigger and more bodacious, our teeth shrank proportionately. Who needs a giant set of chompers when you’re such a smartypants that you can make tools to slice and dice your food and then cook it over a fire? But a new study says hang on, now — looks like our big brains and tiny teeth aren’t linked after all.

Published today in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the study compared brain size evolution with reduced tooth size rates in eight hominin species: two australopiths (A. africanus and A. afarensis, roughly 1.9-2.9 million years old), two members of Paranthropus (P. robustus and P. boisei, 900,000-1.2 million years old) and four examples from our own genus Homo (H. habilis, H. erectus, H. neanderthalensis, from the last 1.7 million years, and modern humans).

Although conventional wisdom has pointed to co-evolution of the big human brain, little human teeth traits, the study showed the rate of brain size evolution varied from one species to the next with occasional bouts of rapid development.

Brain shape evolution, which is also linked to higher cognitive function, seemed to have a generally more stable rate of change. Meanwhile, the reduction in size of teeth, particularly the molars and other chewing (rather than biting) teeth, occurred at a steadier rate that did not appear linked to brain size or shape development.

The fastest “spurt” in brain size increase occurred between H. habilis and H. erectus; overall the trend towards bigger brains is, perhaps no surprise, speediest along the Homo line, leaving Australopithecus and Paranthropus in the dust.

Fun fact: we used to think big brains were needed to fashion stone tools, too, but the world’s oldest known stone tools, described in 2015, date from the age of australopiths, well before our brainiac genus. As we find more hominin fossils and create ever more sophisticated techniques to analyze and understand them, expect more old school ideas to go extinct.

The team concluded that different environmental and behavioral influences were at work in human brain and teeth evolution rates, though speculating on what those influences might have been went beyond the scope of their research.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Living World, top posts
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Mazhar Hussain

    God created man from clay. There was no evolution but direct creation of human. That is why there is no relation between brain and teeth. Deep research will reveal one day the truth.

    • Devlin Tay

      Still spouting your plagiarised Bronze Age mythology, I see.

      • Nicolás Vera

        “it’s ancient so it must be wrong”. You seem like a philosophical genius, don’t you?

        • Jesse Parrish

          I think he’s technically correct, and he didn’t say what you quoted nor any logical equivalent.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Dead Things

Digging up the dirt on the latest finds and wierdest revelations, from lost civilizations to dinosaurs.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+