The Touching Story of a Dinosaur Face

By Gemma Tarlach | March 30, 2017 8:00 am
A reconstruction of the face of Daspletosaurus horneri, based bone textures, reveals a host of details. (Illustration courtesy of Dino Pulerà)

A reconstruction of the face of Daspletosaurus horneri, based on bone textures, reveals a host of details. (Illustration courtesy of Dino Pulerà)

The eyes may be the window to the soul, but for paleontologists, reconstructing a dinosaur face opens doors into how it may have perceived and interacted with its environment — as well as some features it shared with distant evolutionary kin.

Researchers report being able to put a face to the name of 75-million-year-old Daspletosaurus horneri, a newly described member of one of Dinosauria’s most famous lineages, and discover the animal was the touchy-feely sort.

Bones preserve a lot more than just the internal scaffolding of an animal. Certain textures, from tiny holes to striations to knobby bits can be clues to how and where muscles attached (and what size the muscles were), whether an animal had ornamentation and even the texture of its skin.

Case in point: D. horneri, a tyrannosaurid from the Late Cretaceous of Montana, described for the first time today in Scientific Reports. And yes, fellow dino-geeks, the species name is a nod to the mighty Jack Horner, one of the world’s most influential paleontologists and no stranger to Montana digs.

D. horneri, known from the complete skull and bits of a front and hind limb of one adult plus fragments of at least two other individuals, was about 30 feet long and more than 7 feet tall. Like its distant cousin T. rex, D. horneri was a bipedal carnivore with front limbs really only useful for playing the ukelele.

Dinosaur Face Off

But perhaps the most interesting thing about the new tyranno is its mug. Bones of the dinosaur face were preserved well enough to identify different textures associated with different surface and subcutaneous features.

Another look at D. horneri's reconstructed face with its holotype skull in background for comparison. (Illustration courtesy of Dino Pulerà)

Another look at D. horneri‘s reconstructed face with its holotype skull in background for comparison. (Illustration courtesy of Dino Pulerà)

Most intriguing, D. horneri‘s facial bones have a high density of holes called foramina, which blood vessels and nerves pass through, and these helpful holes occur in a pattern very similar to that of crocodilians, which, like dinosaurs, belong to the group Archosauria.

Foramina in modern crocs facilitates Integumentary Sensory Organs (ISOs). The ISO system sends information about every bump and brush felt by flat scales on the crocodilian’s face to the animal’s brain, allowing a high degree of tactile sensitivity. How high a degree? According to the authors of today’s paper, crocodile snouts are “more sensitive than human fingertips.”

It’s reasonable to believe, given the similarities in foramina number and location, that D. horneri and other tyrannosaurids had ISOs as well, which would have provided useful information about the immediate environment. The touchy-feely nature of their faces would have helped with everything from handling prey to scouting out a good nest site.

Groovy Like Birds

Another intriguing dinosaur face find courtesy of D. horneri was a feature not found in crocodilians but present in birds: a groove in the dentary, or front of the lower jaw. In birds, the groove is deeply inset and well-defined, but in tyrannosaurids it’s more shallow. The groove is full of foramina in both tyrannosaurids and birds, and researchers believe that its presence in the dinosaurs suggests that it was an important prerequisite for evolving the vascularization needed to have a beak.

After all, while not directly ancestral to birds, tyrannosaurids belong to the major dino-gang Theropoda, which also includes the lineage that did evolve into Tweetie and the like.

Descended from dinosaurs. Not from tyrannosaurids, though. (Credit Wikimedia Commons/Cheepshot)

Descended from dinosaurs. Not from tyrannosaurids, though. (Credit Wikimedia Commons/Cheepshot)

The researchers reconstructed D. horneri‘s distinctive face by comparing its fossilized bone textures with that of alligators and several species of birds.

The new paper also makes the case for D. horneri being an example of anagenesis, when enough changes accumulate over time to turn one species into another in a linear way, as opposed to cladogenesis, in which one ancestor species radiates into multiple other species.

D. horneri seems to be, in fact, one of the more intriguing new species popping up in the literature over the past few months. But sorry, pro-fluff friends, no evidence of feathers on this dinosaur face.

After more than 66 million years in the ground, D. horneri gets to go sledding... or at least gets hauled to a new home in protective jacketing. (Credit David Varricchio)

After more than 66 million years in the ground, D. horneri gets to go sledding… or at least gets hauled to a new home in protective jacketing. (Credit David Varricchio)

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Living World, top posts
ADVERTISEMENT
  • OWilson

    What is always missing from dinosaur reconstructed faces is “expression”. They are always mechanical and robotical.

    Look at that photo of the eagle!

    Likewise look at the face of a crafty crocodile., you’ll see what I mean :)

  • Mike Richardson

    Fascinating find! It’s amazing the evolutionary adaptations tyranosaurs developed over the course of so many millions of years. It’s understandable that species lacking arms of any practical use would compensate by developing better tactile sensation at the head. Though powerful and deadly weapons, the jaws of these great predators would also have been used to grasp and hold things (including possibly their young, as some more maternal crocodiles do) and to probe. A good sense of touch would have been very useful. As for feathers, if they served as insulation, they probably would have been unnecessary for multi-ton tyranosaurs, at least as adults.

  • GORT

    It’s a well-known fact that dinosaurs with short arms enjoy playing the ukulele, and some even like to wear grass skirts. [=====]

  • GORT

    It’s a well-known fact that dinosaurs with short arms enjoy playing the ukulele, and some even like to wear grass skirts. [=====]

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6a341e146e4e3742945545fc5d8f86a066d5ffaae1855631e18f073df5ebe93a.png

  • khalid sideek

    The endless series of lies of the adults fairy tale (The Holy Evolution)
    Fuck your millions of years

    • Electric Bill

      Khaleed—

      You, sir, are one of the idiot fools that reads claptrap written centuries ago, and are moronic enough to think that such misinformation trumps looking at the real world, using scientific methodology to come to reasonable conclusions, and actually building a rational view of the past and future regarding life, geologic processes and the universe.

      Morons such as yourself that have no physical proof of your assumptions… beliefs based on nothing but old screed that conflicts with reasoning and science… think that if you call people, established fact and science all kinds of foul terms, that it will somehow win arguments. No: that is not how it works… the one who slings the most mud wins nothing but pity for being such a pathetic fool.

      • khalid sideek

        I am PhD person, a researcher and a lecturer. Who are you?
        You (Darwin followers) no nothing but: bad language, threatening, and ugly words just like your faces.
        I will speak the same language that you guys understand:
        you and your funny evolution are nothing but a real excrement.

    • Michael

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Thanks. I needed that laugh.

  • Dan Tucker

    OWilson says, “Look at the photo of the eagle.” And? The eagle’s natural look is fearsome, or so we would say. Every adult eagle, hawk and Great Horned Owl I’ve ever seen looks fearsome. Mechanical and robotical, if you will. You can’t give a photo of an animal an expression it doesn’t naturally have. You can in a reconstruction or drawing give them a different expression. But then what’s the point? You’re making a cartoon of the animal then.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Dead Things

Digging up the dirt on the latest finds and wierdest revelations, from lost civilizations to dinosaurs.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+