Olson’s Extinction: The Permian’s Dirty Little Secret Die-off

By Gemma Tarlach | April 4, 2017 6:00 pm
In one of Charles R. Knight's famous paintings, a dimetrodon (don't call it a dinosaur!) seems to be enjoying a last, lingering look at its environment before Olson's Extinction sends all of its kind packing. (Credit American Museum of Natural History)

In one of Charles R. Knight’s famous 19th century paintings, an Early Permian dimetrodon (don’t call it a dinosaur!) seems to be enjoying itself, happy and carefree, with no idea about the mass extinctions on the horizon. (Credit American Museum of Natural History/Wikimedia Commons)

It’s the mass extinction you probably haven’t heard about, because for a long time researchers have questioned whether it even existed. But a growing body of evidence, including a study published today, has strengthened the case for Olson’s Extinction — which played a role in our species eventually dominating the planet, for better or worse (mostly worse).

For whatever reason, people seem to dig mass extinctions. At least the ones in the past. Far fewer folk are entertained by (or even aware of) what many researchers are calling the sixth mass extinction, going on right now and all thanks to our own meddling species.

But I digress. The fossil record provides ample evidence for five big mass extinctions, most infamously the Great Dying at the end of the Permian (or end-Permian, if you want to be a cool paleo-nerd). That was when, about 250 million years ago, some 90 percent of marine species and more than 70 percent of land species shuffled, swam or slithered off this mortal coil.

(For many people, what springs to mind when they hear the term “mass extinction” is likely the end-Cretaceous event of 66 million years ago, when a number of species, including all the dinosaurs that weren’t birds, went buh-bye. But for sheer biodiversity-crushing scale, the end-Permian wins the deathrace, hands down.)

Some 66 million years ago, the end-Cretaceous extinction event killed off the dinosaurs and other animals, but it wasn't the biggest die-off. And yes, I know the depiction here is a bit dramatic...this one goes out to all the people a little too into extinction level events. (Credit: National Science Foundation/Zina Deretsky)

Some 66 million years ago, the end-Cretaceous extinction event killed off the dinosaurs and other animals, but it wasn’t the biggest die-off. And yes, I mentioned the end-Cretaceous in the previous paragraph just to have an excuse to post this delightfully dramatic rendering. This one goes out to all the people a little too into extinction level events. (Credit: National Science Foundation/Zina Deretsky)

We don’t know what caused the Big Five previous mass extinctions, though a number of researchers have proposed that they’re cyclical and extraterrestrial in nature — note: the jury is still out on both counts for now. Scientists can’t even agree on what was the main catalyst for the end-Cretaceous event: While many adhere to the Chicxulub asteroid impact theory, a smaller camp puts most of the blame on massive volcanic eruptions that created the Deccan Traps in India.

Two things we do know: In addition to the Big Five, there have been a number of smaller but still consequential mini-mass deaths, and every die-off, from the Great Dying to the Not-So-Great, wreaks havoc with environments and established ecological hierarchies. The end-Cretaceous, for example, by bumping off the non-avian dinosaurs, cleared the way for what were, at the time, ankle-biter mammals to expand territory and diversify.

Olson’s Extinction Fills a Gap

Into all this death and destruction comes the long debate about Olson’s Extinction, sometimes still called Olson’s Gap.

In paleontology (and many other fields), researchers are rarely handed a nice neat scientific advance all wrapped in a bow. The fossil record we have now started out with bits of bone here and there in places people bothered to look.

Over the last two centuries (and that’s really the whole span that humans have been looking for fossils in any sort of methodical way), the numbers of fossils added to the record, and their diversity across time and geography, have been nothing short of thrilling.

But there’s still work to do.

There are number of spots in the record that are still big question marks. I’ve written before about one of them, Romer’s Gap, which started roughly 360 million years ago, just as the first terrestrial vertebrates were evolving.

Fortunately, recent finds in Scotland, Canada and a potential site in the U.S. have begun to fill in that big blank in the fossil record. Romer’s Gap appears to have been simply people not looking in the right place for fossils of a given period. It’s what researchers sometimes call a sampling bias.

Now we come to Olson’s Extinction, nee Olson’s Gap, around 272 million years ago. It’s a similar sort of hole in the fossil record. But in this case, it appears that the lack of fossils is due to a big die-off.

To The Memory of Dimetrodon

Before Olson’s Extinction, terrestrial vertebrate life in the Early Permian was dominated by a rich array of amphibians and pelycosaurs, including sail-backed dimetrodon, the animal most commonly mistaken for a dinosaur. (Nope. Not even close. Dinosaurs evolved along a completely different branch and wouldn’t show up for more than 20 million years after Olson’s Extinction. So stop putting dimetrodon in dollar store “toy dinosaur fun packs.” Seriously, people.)

Pelycosaurs are a primitive type of synapsid and if you’re starting to think too many paleojargony words, hang in there. Because you’ll be interested in where I’m going with all this.

After Olson’s Extinction, pelycosaurs all but vanished. During the Middle Permian and continuing for several million years until the Great Dying (circa 252 million years ago), amphibian diversity dropped off big time and life on land was dominated by therapsids, a more advanced branch of synapsids.

A gorgonopsian, part of the therapsid crew at the top of their game by the Late Permian. I shall call him Jafar. (Credit Alannis/Wikimedia Commons)

A gorgonopsian, part of the therapsid crew at the top of their game by the Late Permian. I shall call him Jafar. (Credit Alannis/Wikimedia Commons)

One group of therapsids, the cynodonts, made it through the Great Dying and eventually evolved into mammals, including Homo sapiens. So see? It really was all about you.

A Question of Latitude

But enough about you, let’s talk more about Olson. Specifically Everett C. Olson, the American paleontologist who in the mid-20th century started to write about the gap/extinction event that now bears his name. For the past 70 or so years, researchers have debated whether the apparent gap was the result of sampling bias or a mass extinction event.

One complication in sorting it all out was the lack of geographic continuity in the fossil record. Earlier fossils from the Glory Days of Dimetrodon and other pelycosaurs were almost exclusively from areas of North America and Western Europe which, in the Early Permian, were nearer to the equator.

Meanwhile, post-Olson event fossils from the Middle and Late Permian came almost entirely from Russia and South Africa, both of which sat in temperate latitudes.

No continuity in the fossil record has meant contention among paleontologists. One 2013 paper, for example, cites the Olson Affair as a matter of switching sampling bias from species-rich equatorial regions to species-poor cooler climes — that typical distribution of species, by the way, is called the latitudinal biodiversity gradient (LBG), and it’s going to get shot through the heart in a few paragraphs.

Published today in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, however, the latest volley in the Sampling Bias v. Megadeath debate has made a convincing case for the latter: Olson’s Event was indeed a mass extinction extravaganza.

The Devil Is In The Data

Using current biostratigraphy (dead stuff found in dateable rock layers) and highly refined data-crunching methods, the team behind today’s study tested both the sampling bias and mass extinction hypotheses against information from throughout the Permian fossil record. And they found that a sampling bias is not supported.

Instead, there appears to have been a mass extinction — Olson’s Extinction — at the end of the Early Permian or start of the Middle Permian. That die-off shuffled the ecological hierarchy enough to get the pelycosaurs out of the way and set the stage for the therapsids, which led to the cynodonts which led to, after quite some time, our own species (Remember: all about you).

The researchers caution that whatever caused Olson’s Extinction (we still don’t know that), it affected different latitudes differently. Après-extinction event, higher-latitude species seemed to diversify at a more rapid pace compared with equatorial species. That would make sense if equatorial species were harder hit by the extinction, which leads us to:

RIP, LBG (At Least Sometimes)

LBG, the pattern that has been true for more than 20 million years, tells us we’ll find more species diversity at lower latitudes and less of it at higher latitudes.

Paleontologists have found, however, that the LBG hasn’t always held true further back in the fossil record. In fact, it’s looking more and more like the period around Olson’s Extinction was one of an inverted LBG: The equatorial region had less diverse life than the higher latitudes.

Wait, these researchers are just making this all up to fit what they want to be true, I hear you grumbling, to which I reply, Au contraire, mon petit cynique. We’ve got decent enough climate data from this portion of the Permian to believe that Earth was heating up and drying out, so living at or near the equator would have been less hospitable, even though, you know, it’s a dry heat.

P.S.: While today’s paper points to an inverted LBG during the Olson’s Extinction timeframe, a study out last week in Science hints that climate change might just be nudging the world in that direction again. As Earth heats up, more flora and fauna are moving to higher latitudes. It’s too early to say whether the shift in biodiversity will be substantial enough to invert the LBG — or how many species will go the way of dimetrodon.

Long-dead Dimetrodon, which slipped the surly bonds of Earth well before Olson's Extinction but remains the most recognizable species of the Early Permian...not the Age of Dinosaurs. (Credit Dylan Kereluk/Wikimedia Commons)

Long-dead Dimetrodon, which slipped the surly bonds of Earth well before Olson’s Extinction but remains the most recognizable species of the Early Permian…not the Age of Dinosaurs. (Credit Dylan Kereluk/Wikimedia Commons)

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Living World, top posts
ADVERTISEMENT
  • OWilson

    Perhaps we will never know precisely that caused these mass extinctions, but they should not be a mystery to anybody.

    A quick glance around at our solar system neighbors tells you that every rocky planet bears the scars of some serious and catastrophic bombardment from protoplanets, moons, comets and asteroids of all shapes and sizes. Even with weathering and erosion on earth we have some mighty huge craters.

    The larger ones may well disturb the earth’s relatively thin crust, and cause your continental volcanism to boot.

    With untold numbers of these asteroids and comets still around, there may even be one headed this way as we speak, with our name on it. :)

    • indy483rdFMS

      You left out electrical scaring, as far as catastrophic events. Although, they wouldn’t have caused extinction.

      • OWilson

        The sheer amount of debris in space, the abundance meteorites found, and the composition of the minerals found in the impact zones, militates in favor of external impact caused craters. Volcanism is another, but less common cause

        Plus the fact we can witness these events somewhere in the solar system or here on earth almost every day, militates against electrical scarring.

        • nik

          Some of the satellite pictures of Mars, show scarring that could only be caused by electrical means. In addition, the vast areas of what have been nicknamed ‘blueberries’ are synonymous with ‘weld spatter,’ easily recognisable to anyone who has worked as a welder, with electric arc welding.
          Close encounters of two large bodies, both with electromagnetic fields, like Earth, and Jupiter for instance is bound to cause massive discharges.
          On Earth, weathering has obliterated most of the evidence, but on Mars it’s clear.

          • R. Frank
          • nik

            Not true, ”Unlike the Earth, Mars has no inner dynamo to create a major global magnetic field. This, however, does not mean that Mars does not have a magnetosphere; simply that it is less extensive than that of the Earth. The magnetosphere of Mars is far simpler and less extensive than that of the Earth.” [Google.]

            If you were welding a piece of metal, the piece of metal would not supply the power, it would be from an external source.
            The same would apply to Mars.
            Also, clouds and air currents produce massive electrical discharges, lightning, so two atmospheres in close proximity would do the same.

          • R. Frank

            Then you are saying there is substantial global magnetic field to inhibit the lethal cosmic rays? The reports from the rovers and the satellites orbiting mars apparently disagree.

          • nik

            You obviously didnt read my last post fully, or didnt understand it.
            QUOTE!
            ”This, however, does not mean that Mars does not have a magnetosphere; simply that IT IS LESS EXTENSIVE than that of the Earth.”

            So, I am not saying, ”……there is substantial global magnetic field to inhibit the lethal cosmic rays.”

            I am just showing that your statement, ”Mars has NO electromagnetic field,” is incorrect, and therefore the magnetic field of Mars, and that of another planet could interact, and cause massive discharges.

            The radiation from space would still be very unhealthy, and its my opinion that the only safe place to live on Mars, would be underground. Anything other than brief excursions on the surface, would be very hazardous, even within a vehicle, unless it was substantially shielded against cosmic rays, which could be a severe weight, or energy penalty, or both.
            The sunlight received by Mars is so weak, that any attempt at growing food on the surface without substantial additional artificial light would probably be unsuccessful. It would also be too damn cold, and energy costly to heat, so, underground farming would be essential, as it will be the only place that would be protected from, all the hazards that exist in quantity on the surface.
            Then there is still the problem of water. So far there is no proof that there are sufficient supplies on Mars that could be readily accessible.
            All in all, its a damned dangerous, and unhealthy place.

          • R. Frank

            You are correct my error was not being more precise in my statement; I did not mean No magnetic field but but the lack of sufficient magnetic strength to repel cosmic rays. I regret my inexactness. Your subsequent responses I found very exact. Thank you for taking the time to clarify your position.

    • nik

      About 650-630 million years ago, the Earth entered an event in its history called, ”Snowball Earth,” when it is thought the the entire globe was covered in ice.
      ”Nobody knows,” what brought the Earth out of that situation, or so it is said on several sites that I have looked at.

      Perhaps they are asking the wrong question. Instead of asking why it stopped, maybe if they asked why it started, the answer to why it stopped would also be answered.

      Most sane people now accept that the Earth orbits the sun. The Sun also orbits the centre of the galaxy. That orbit takes approximately 600 million years to complete.

      During that orbit, the Solar system passes through the spiral arms of the Galaxy. When that occurs, the Earth experiences a cooling, due to the interstellar dust in the arms partially blocking the solar radiation. It also may experience increased impacts from meteorites, and meteors. In addition, gravitational effects may cause increased volcanic, and earthquake activity, as it did during the Permian extinction event, 300 million years ago. There are also shorter periodical events due to the solar path through the plane of the galaxy being more of a sine wave.

      http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/PageMill_Images/image277.gif

      During the last 600 million years, the Earth has experienced four of these events, as shown in the graph, [link above] when the Earth experienced a precipitous drop [geologically speaking] in global temperature at, 450 million years ago, 300 million years ago, 150 million years ago, and NOW!

      As the ‘Snowball Earth’ event lasted 30-50 million years, and all subsequent events have also lasted a similar period, it would be logical to conclude that the effects following each of the subsequent events would be similar to that of ‘Snowball Earth.’

      Two of these effects were, a precipitous drop in temperature, as solar energy reduced, and eventually, a precipitous rise in temperature, as the solar energy reaching Earth returned to its ‘normal’ level. [In geological terms.]

      Therefore, it is also logical to conclude that the ”Snowball Earth” event probably followed the same pattern, and it was the return of solar energy to its normal level, as the solar system departed from the effects of the being engulfed in the spiral arm of the galaxy, that brought the Earth out of its deep freeze.

      No other effects would be required.

      As the present event is 600 million years since the ”snowball Earth,” event, and the Solar orbit around the galaxy takes 600 million years, is is logical to conclude that the present event will be a repeat of the ‘Snowball Earth’ event. The present event is already about 30-40 million years along its path, so the question is, has the temperature drop bottomed out, or will it continue to get colder. If it does, the next ice age could last much longer than the usual 90,000 years or so. Only time will tell.

      However, as the thickness of the line showing temperature, is probably equal to 1-2 million years, and the oldest remains of Homo Sapiens that have been found, are only 200 thousand years old, there is probably no need for humans to panic. Yet!
      Nik

      • watcherofolde

        thanks

        • nik

          You’re welcome.
          Update: A recent announcement has put the oldest homo sapiens remains at 300,000 years. Still insignificant in geological times.

  • John Sarsfield

    Clearly it was caused by George Bush.

    • http://secure93.com Tom Stephens

      Profiting using the net is often as comfortable (or as problematical) just like earning income off-line. However numerous Internet marketing innovators state to have got a top-secret model for making easy cash, the fact is, it does not use any technique you may turn into unbelievably rich immediately by means of clicking a key or even investing in some e book. Generating revenue through the web needs working hard and also patience. For everybody who is willing give plenty of time as well as work into it, there are various strategies for generating additional paycheck via the web.I am receiving $10000 or even much more each and every month from this work.Here is the quick way to make more money although the others are long-term home money making ideas >>>>> GET.LC/itv0X

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Dead Things

Digging up the dirt on the latest finds and wierdest revelations, from lost civilizations to dinosaurs.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+