Breaking: 5.7 Million-Year-Old “Hominin Footprints” In Jeopardy

By Gemma Tarlach | September 15, 2017 10:44 am
Is this depression and others like it at a site in Crete actually footprints? If so, what made them? Researchers believe they are indeed footprints — and were made 5.7 million years ago by hominins. (Credit Andrzej Boczarowski)

Is this depression and others like it at a site in Crete actually hominin footprints? (Credit Andrzej Boczarowski)

12:02 p.m.: “In the context of the field, it’s the equivalent of blowing up the Sphinx in Egypt. It’s a big deal,” says Bournemouth University’s Matthew Bennett, confirming that several of the footprints he and colleagues described in a paper published in August as belonging to an early hominin have been destroyed or stolen. But Bennett adds: “At the same time, no scientific data has been lost.”

That’s because the detailed, sophisticated analysis carried out on the 5.7-million-year-old footprints, preserved on a beach at Trachilos in western Crete, included high-resolution digital scans of every print. The team behind the controversial paper used those scans to develop models that they compared against prints from a variety of primate and non-primate species before concluding that the individual that made the tracks was an early hominin.

Scans Survive Scam

The team had always planned to make all of the digital scans available to everyone, including colleagues interested in challenging their conclusions; the loss of a few of the prints, says Bennett, has no effect on the availability of the information they contained.

“The bottom line is, a digital scan is a digital scan. The data is there,” says Bennett. “In terms of someone not being able to study (the prints) now, that’s rubbish.”

Co-author Per Ahlberg, a paleontologist at Sweden’s Uppsala University, had previously noted that in 2011, someone had spray-painted graffiti over several of the footprints in an apparent random act of vandalism not connected to their controversial interpretation. The graffiti had no impact on the data or the team’s conclusions, however.

It’s Not All Bad News

Bennett says he became aware that there was “some damage” to the site when his Greek colleagues began sending emails on Tuesday, about three days ago. He says that local authorities reacted to the vandalism swiftly: “The municipality moved within 24 hours to cover the site, put down tarps and tons of gravel over the tracks that remain.”

While that may sound like dumping destruction upon destruction, literally, what Bennett calls a “great big heap of rubble” over the remaining trackways is actually a protective measure to guard against future acts of vandalism. Other fossil hominin trackways, such as 3.6 million-year-old footprints in Laetoli, Kenya, for example, are typically covered over with a variety of materials whenever they are not actively being studied.

What’s more, says Bennett, the individual who destroyed part of the site to nab a few of the prints “didn’t know what he was looking for and didn’t get the best of the tracks.”

The Thief’s Agenda

The tracks and the team’s interpretation of them as hominin have stirred controversy in many quarters, for many reasons. Because current paleoanthropological consensus is that hominins evolved in Africa and were not present in Europe until about 2 million years ago — 3.7 million years after the Trachilos impressions were made — many in the field rejected the team’s conclusions.

Others, both in field and in the general public, claimed the team was making some kind of Eurocentric bid for humans evolving in Europe. The European “cradle of humankind” was assumed a century ago, with more than a dash of racism, but was long ago cast aside as more and more fossil finds, beginning with those collected by Raymond Dart in South Africa, showed that modern humans evolved in Africa.

Co-author Ahlberg, in conversation before the theft, made it clear that the team has no interest in resurrecting the idea of an ancestral European homeland.

“Some people have suggested that we are driven by a Eurocentrism claim. We are making no claim whatsoever,” said Ahlberg, adding: “They mustn’t confuse this with the origin of modern humans. It’s clear modern humans evolved in Africa.”

Speaking today in light of the act of vandalism, Bennett echoed his colleague’s sentiment about not playing geopolitics with the hominin footprints: “The clarion call for me is that it’s a possibility. Let’s be open-minded. It’s about allowing debate. I don’t think damage to the site affects that.”

News of the discovery of the footprints was also received negatively by individuals who do not believe in evolution, says Bennett, who admits he initially assumed the prints’ controversy was behind the destruction and theft.

“When it happened, I did think it could be some anti-evolutionist,” says Bennett. “But from what I’ve learned from the team that is speaking directly with police and the government, it was not.”

In fact, the motive for the act of destruction was much more basic: greed.

“It was for sale,” says Bennett. “Publicity has been a very important part of this process. You’ve got to raise awareness of the site in order to get the resources to protect it. But publicity is a double-edged sword, and somebody apparently heard about it and thought ‘oooh, there’s money there.’ ”

Confirming some of the Greek media reports, Bennett says his contacts told him the individual arrested in northern Greece for the theft was a school teacher who was trying to sell the prints. He had no further information.

Bennett adds that his initial reaction was emotional — not for himself and the rest of the team, because the data gleaned from the site is unaffected — but for ordinary people now deprived of visiting what may be the paleoanthropological find that rewrites hominin evolution.

“The people I feel most upset for are the general public that might want to see it,” Bennett says of the now off-limits site. “You want to go and see them, put your hand against them, and now you can’t. I feel that.”

Update: Read more about the theft in an essay Bennett wrote, published this afternoon at

11:23 a.m.: Bournemouth University’s Matthew Bennett, a co-author of the August paper laying out the case for the Trachilos footprints belonging to a hominin, has confirmed that several of the prints were cut out of the preserved rock layers at the site and stolen. Bennett added that, according to emails from his Greek colleagues who are in direct contact with municipal and regional authorities there, the individual responsible for the vandalism and theft has been arrested. More information shortly.

10:43 a.m. Discover Time: Remember those 5.7 million-year-old footprints allegedly made by a hominin in Greece? They’re back in the news. A number of stories from local and regional Greek outlets claim the site has been destroyed. The stories are reporting different locations and basic details, however, and cannot at this time be confirmed. We’re tracking the story and will provide updates here as they come in. Watch this space.


CATEGORIZED UNDER: Living World, top posts

Comments (20)

  1. s k

    much ado about nothing, relatively speaking.

    • OWilson

      If you’ve spent a lifetime in the field, and maybe written a lot of the literature on the subject, with your books still in print, you may have a different attitude to apparent “new evidence” however controversial! 🙂

  2. iThinker2

    Why do some think it important to cover of destroy evidence of ancient humans.

    • Lorie Franceschi

      The same reason that according to some religions, the Earth is only a little over 6,000+ years old, according to the life spans from Adam to present day humans.
      They don’t want to believe the facts so they don’t want anyone else to use or see the facts to disprove their belief on how old the world is to them that take the Bible literally.

      • Square_Deal

        Your reasoning doesn’t hold water. Why would creationists want to destroy evidence that calls into doubt the current theory of human evolution? If these are human footprints, as they appear to be (long sole, big toe, ball, no claws, toes forward), then they are in the wrong place and much too old to jive with the “out of Africa” story. It will be interesting to see how evolutionary scientists work this into their concept. Also, since there are many more proofs of the earth’s age, destroying human footprints would not in any way bolster their argument for a young earth.

      • MMA_Miami Rocks

        Go away hater. Your ‘stupid’ is showing.

      • Jeffrey Cartier

        I would tend to agree however most biblical literalists do not trouble themselves over facts or evidence derived from scientific practices.

    • 31007 - TANSTAAFL

      Did you bother to read the article. The motive was greed. The thief was trying to sell the fossil footprints.

      • Ishkanah

        Yeah that’ s what he claimed but i really doubt that is the real reason because if his statement was true and he wanted to sell it then why he damaged the footprints?

        It is like he tried to erase their existance from history so that noone will learn the truth for what reason?

        Who want to erase those proofs?

        Obviously some scientists and whatever circle of rich people with piwer there is wants these footprints out if the picture.

        • 31007 - TANSTAAFL

          OK, I see that you don’t need facts, you are psycho psychic and “know” the real reason he did it.

      • Charles Barnard

        Given the economic situation in Greece, “greed” might not apply so much as “survival.”

        Very little to go on in the article about motivation.

  3. bwana

    Humans, we are a destructive species!

  4. RSA

    Some selfish and misguided scientists or “evolutionists” or even Biblical diehards can’t allow new information released to the public as it destroys the existing “official” narrative that is in the public consciousness. Pathetic!

  5. Erik Bowen

    I tend to think it was somebody trying to get rich. You don’t usually destroy this type of evidence by stealing it… I’n fact, not taking the best ones may be due to the fact that they realized they could charge about the same… What option would you have as a buyer?

  6. Fredrick Hinojosa

    .Some of us see things to the end of our fingers, while I hope most of us see to the horizon

    • Charles Barnard

      The reason that the Y2K computer changeover became a big deal was that until June of 1999 the majority of top managers ignored the problem. Only when it came within their 6 month window did they notice they were not ready, and worse, were unsure just how “not ready” they were.

      In fact, most computer systems which dealt with finance were already dealing with the new century by 1970.

      Most embedded machines and things like EEG machines really didn’t and don’t care what year it is. (They believe whatever you tell them.) But they all got replaced, and billions was spent to avoid problems.

      Having avoided major issues, the public assumed that there had been no real problem. but for over a year, few other software projects made progress, and many were cancelled due to diversion of resources to deal with Y2K.

      The first such issue I personally found was in 1974 with the release of a new version of the OS for our PDP11/34…which would have, if left as shipped, caused the machines to crash the next January.

  7. Charles Barnard

    Interestingly, these date to a “mere” 400,000 years or so after the Mediterranean Sea filled.

    To look for older evidence, we need to search the bottom of the sea.


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Dead Things

Digging up the dirt on the latest finds and weirdest revelations, from lost civilizations to dinosaurs.

See More

Collapse bottom bar