<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Kind of Peer-Review Would Jesus Want?</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/04/11/what-kind-of-peer-review-would-jesus-want/</link>
	<description>Quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maleduck</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/04/11/what-kind-of-peer-review-would-jesus-want/#comment-6508</link>
		<dc:creator>Maleduck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/04/11/what-kind-of-peer-review-would-jesus-want/#comment-6508</guid>
		<description>If there is no "actual science to evaluate,"  why is it that creation scientists always defeat evolution scientists in open debates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is no &#8220;actual science to evaluate,&#8221;  why is it that creation scientists always defeat evolution scientists in open debates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whisky Rabbi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/04/11/what-kind-of-peer-review-would-jesus-want/#comment-6507</link>
		<dc:creator>Whisky Rabbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/04/11/what-kind-of-peer-review-would-jesus-want/#comment-6507</guid>
		<description>I always wondered how many creationists it takes to screw in a light bulb. This may not answer that, but at least now I know how many creationists it takes to co-author a non-peer-reviewable paper. At least not reviewed by creationist peers. God forbid -- the God that created the world in 7 days that is -- that a scientist review a creationist "science" journal article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wondered how many creationists it takes to screw in a light bulb. This may not answer that, but at least now I know how many creationists it takes to co-author a non-peer-reviewable paper. At least not reviewed by creationist peers. God forbid &#8212; the God that created the world in 7 days that is &#8212; that a scientist review a creationist &#8220;science&#8221; journal article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
