DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« Worms Are Picky Ejaculators
Freaky Shrimp Species Has Singular Sight »

R U Serious? Text Messaging Is More Expensive Than Downloading Data from Space.

Text messagingMillions of cell phone users have adopted text messaging as a regular form of communication, to the point where the informal lexicon of “text speak” is infiltrating the school system. But all those “LOL”s and “C U l8er”s may be costing consumers a hefty price. Dr. Nigel Bannister, a space expert at the University of Leicester, compared the cost of sending a text message with the cost of obtaining a megabyte (MB) of data from the Hubble Space Telescope. Sure enough, the text messages were far more expensive.

Bannister explains his calculations as follows:

The maximum size for a text message is 160 characters, which takes 140 bytes because there are only 7 bits per character in the text messaging system, and we assume the average price for a text message is 5p. There are 1,048,576 bytes in a megabyte, so that’s 1 million/140 = 7490 text messages to transmit one megabyte.

At 5 pence (10 cents) per text, that comes to £374.49 (about $734) per MB of text messages sent—around 4.4 times higher than the cost of transmitting the Hubble data, which, according to NASA, costs £8.85 (about $17) per MB to send to the first point of contact on Earth. Which might give you pause next time you go to send “LYSO M8, JK” to 35 of your closest friends.

Share

May 12th, 2008 4:44 PM by Melissa Lafsky in Technology Attacks! | 3 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • Chad

    It has always been baffling to me why text messages are so expensive compared to voice in the US (and the UK, apparently). Clearly, a text message contains far less information than voice, as well as not needing to be the highest-priority bits on the network. Yet a text typically costs ten cents, while for most people most of the time, voice is free.

    This is the complete opposite of my experiences living in Japan, where text is virtually free (~1 cent, and probably covered by your plan, so the first zillion per month cost nothing), while voice is very expensive (20+ cents per minute at night, 30+ during the day). Guess what? Over there, people text all the time and only call when necessary. It definitely makes for more pleasant public places…and makes far more sense. Why US and UK phone companies charge such mystifying prices that defy any basis in the actual cost of the service is a bit beyond me.

  • Tim

    Texts over here cost as much as they do because of pure greed! When I signed up with Alltel in June 2006 it was 8 cents to send or receive a message, now it’s 15 cents for the same thing.

  • Peter Ridgers

    Why do the networks charge so much for texts – because they can!

    The solution is in the hands of the texters – you don’t like the charge don’t use the service! If enough people stop texting prices will fall.





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us