DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« Super Ants Attack Texas Electronics
Insect-Inspired Boat Helps Keep Your Lunch Down »

Attention Stargazers: The Universe Shines Twice as Brightly as We Think.

spaceA group of astronomers in the U.K., Germany, and Australia have determined that the universe is actually twice as bright as previously thought. The reason we’ve been kept in the dark for so long, say the scientists, is because only around half of the light generated by the stars actually reaches us, while the rest is blocked by dust.

Astronomers have long known that dust grains are floating in space, absorbing starlight and re-emiting it to create that starry glow we see in telescopes and on clear nights. They also knew that the older models of dust distribution in galaxies were incorrect, since the energy output these models calculated was greater than the total amount of energy produced by all the stars combined.

So the research team took a new model, created by Dr. Cristina Popescu of the University of Central Lancashire and Richard Tuffs of the Max Plank Institute, and plugged in data from the Millennium Galaxy Catalogue, a “state-of-the-art high resolution catalogue of 10,000 galaxies.” They found that the model’s equations were dead-on, and its accuracy enabled them to calculate the exact amount of starlight from other galaxies—as well as the corresponding energy output— that had been previously obscured by the roving dust.

Incredibly, the found that the universe is a serious nuclear energy contender, producing 5 quadrillion watts of energy per cubic light year—about 300 times the average amount of energy consumed by all humankind.

Share

May 15th, 2008 4:07 PM by Melissa Lafsky in Space & Aliens Therefrom | 2 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • Kin

    That’s a little confusing. 300 times the average amount of energy consumed by all humankind…yearly? And they don’t say the energy the universe produces. Is that by per second, per month, per year that it produces 5 quadrillion watts.

    But, still, interesting

  • Dean Pigeon

    After looking up how much electriciy mankind used in 2005, it seems this article is refering to 300 times the amount of energy consumed by mankind in one year.

    A Watt is a Joule per Second. A Joule is a unit of energy. A watt is energy produced per amount of time passed, just like velocity is a rate of distance traveled per time passed. Asking how many watts are produced per month is like asking how many miles per hour you went per month. What you really want to ask is, how many Joules are produced per month? Not how many Watts. In the same way, you would ask how many miles you went per month, not how many M.P.H. you went per month.

    A Watt is a unit of power (power is not energy, power is the RATE at which energy is being produced). 5 quadrillion Joules per Second, multiplied by any amount of time in seconds, tells you how much energy was produced by an average cubic light year of the universe in that amount of time. For example, to find the energy produced by one average cubic light year of the universe, you would take 5,000,000,000,000,000 and multiply it by 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 (which is 31,536,000 seconds). This gives you 1.5768 * 10^23 Joules of energy produced in one year by the average cubic light year of the universe.





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us