DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« Alarming Number of Patients Think About Killing Their Doctors
Malaysian Scientists Hope Sterilized Mosquitoes Will Wipe Themselves Out »

Giant Rat Less Giant Than Originally Thought

The skull of Josephoartigasia monesiIf one Canadian researcher is right, the largest rodent ever found just lost about 1,300 pounds.

A biological brouhaha started this week over the fossils of the Josephoartigasia monesi, a giant rat that made its home a couple million years ago in what is now Uruguay. Unfortunately, only the fossilized skull survived — scientists never unearthed any of the remainder of the skeleton, so they had had to do a little guessing as to the rest of the creature’s proportions. Using the ratio of the size of a modern rat’s head to its body, the Uruguayan scientists who dug up the bones in January said the creature would have weighed a full ton — about 2,200 pounds, or 15 times heavier than the largest rodent roaming the earth today.

But their calculations may have been inaccurate, says Virginie Millien of McGill University in Montreal. By taking a wider sample of modern rodents, she now predicts that the rat could have been much smaller — as light as 770 pounds. But modern rats aside, you can still only tell so much from looking at a skull. Millien’s calculations have a range of possibilities extending as high as 3,300 pounds, though that size is rather unlikely. The Uruguay team was quick to point out that her mean figure — about 2,000 pounds — was only slightly lower than theirs.

If these details sound trivial, remember that the giant rat broke the previous rodent record, held by a 1,500 pound guinea pig discovered in Venezuela, so any weight reduction could knock the new find off its pedestal. Fortunately for J. monesi‘s pride, even at 770 pounds it would weigh in far heavier than its largest living relative. And, fortunately for those of us who are easily disgusted, it’s not coming back into existence anytime soon.

Image: Andres Rinderknecht & Ernesto Blanco © 2008

Share

May 22nd, 2008 9:13 AM Tags: extinction, unusual organisms
by Andrew Moseman in The Wide (& Strange) World of Animals | 3 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • http://www.wowgoldkaufen.info/ WoW Gold

    WoW Gold kaufen…

    [...]we strongly recommend the websites below this line that will help[...]……

  • http://www.responsiva.biz/data-services/b2b-data-lists.php b2b data

    b2b data…

    [...]will always help you get the right prospects for your b2b mailing lists so[...]……

  • http://www.reggiadicaserta.org/ advertising

    seo…

    [...]Do check out these internet sites below for great offers and informations[...]……





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us