DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« Why Do I Feel Woozy? I’ve Only Had One Enormous Glass of Wine
Weekly Science Blog Roundup »

Hey, That’s My Patent! Biotech Brouhaha Erupts Over Cloning Dogs

black lab.
I’m not one of a kind?!?

There can be only one dog cloning operation, or so says Lou Hawthorne, the CEO of BioArts, a biotech company based in California.

You may have heard that a South Korean company called RNL Bio announced earlier this week that they produced four cloned copies of a Labrador retriever. The original dog, Marine, was excellent at cancer-sniffing—able to pick out breast, prostate, lung, and bladder cancer cells. But she couldn’t have puppies, so her owner, canine trainer Yuji Satoh, asked RNL Bio to clone her. Two of the four new Marines have been donated to Satoh’s training center and to the Seoul National University lab; the other two are on the market for a cool half-million dollars each. And RNL Bio announced plans to venture into the pet market, cloning your deceased canine if you’ve got the cash.

All these moves have ruffled Hawthorne’s feathers. In a perturbed press release today, he says that his company, BioArts, owns the sole worldwide rights to use it the dog-cloning procedure patented by Start Licensing, another American company. “RNL has no right to offer this service, and is practicing black market cloning,” Hawthorne says. “Individuals who wish to clone a beloved dog have only one legal option, and that’s our Best Friends Again program.”

This isn’t the first time Korean scientists have cloned dogs, and it’s not clear right now how the law will sort this out—Start Licensing has repeatedly threatened legal action, but according to the English-language South Korean newspaper JoongAng Daily, patent disputes are somewhat new to Korea. Seoul National University, the largest patent holders in South Korea, has some staff members connected to RNL Bio, but didn’t have a single patent attorney as of last month, according to the same article.

If courts or trade organizations don’t step in, the marketplace may decide this matter. Early next month, BioArts plans to hold a series of online auctions with six-figure opening prices where people can bid for the few available spots to have BioArts clone their pet. So dig out the checkbook, dog lovers—bidding starts July 5.

Image: flickr/MiikaS

Share

June 19th, 2008 6:08 PM Tags: genetic engineering
by Andrew Moseman in The Wide (& Strange) World of Animals | 6 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • robert2008

    Koreans are smart. They will change a few things and patent their own cloning process.
    That’s what the dumb American gets for trying to make a fast buck!

  • tkv001

    If patent rights can’t be upheld around the world then there would truly be chaos in the market. Companies invest millions of dollars in developing new technology. The only way they can often recoup that money is to have the protection that no one else will copy the technology they paid for. This is not a question of what ‘dump American’s get for trying to make a fast buck.’ BioArts paid a significant amount of money to license the patents. Why should a Korean company (or any other company for that matter) get to take advantage of expensive technology and patents without paying for it also? Can Americans or Europeans or Chinese or anyone else just start copying technology developed by Korean companies like LG, Samsung and Hyundai? Patent rights must be protected around the world. If Korea expects to be treated like a developed nation, then it must play by the developed nations’ intellectual property laws.

  • http://www.uspatentlaw.us Utah Patent Attorney

    The US Patent and Trademark Office is 1.5 million applications behind and counting. The supervisors at the USPTO work from home (!!!). Something needs to be done. Somebody please appoint somebody who will fix this problem.

  • http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/07/02/biotech-company-selects-worlds-worthiest-dog-and-wants-to-clone-it/ Biotech Company Selects World’s Worthiest Dog, and Wants to Clone it | Discoblog | Discover Magazine

    [...] last time we wrote about BioArts, the California-based biotech company was threatening action against a South Korean competitor over what BioArts says was patent infringement on its dog-cloning [...]

  • http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2009/06/16/looking-to-immortalize-your-pet-now-you-can-turn-muffy%e2%80%99s-dna-into-a-diamond/ Looking to Immortalize Your Pet? Now You Can Turn Muffy’s DNA Into a Diamond | Discoblog | Discover Magazine

    [...] a world without Fido, Misty or Max, now there’s an alternative to getting it stuffed—or cloned. Just yank some fur from your pet’s hide and send it to DNA2Diamonds, where a team will [...]

  • http://www.batemanip.com Utah Patent Lawyers

    I’m interested to hear the follow up. Also, it seems pretty far fetched to think that BioArts paid the funds to wrap up all the patentable countries.

    Ok. Bad pun, but it was fun.





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us