DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« I Can’t Fly! Birds Lost Their Aerial Abilities Multiple Times
Aliens Could Send Messages Through the Stars, Scientist Says »

Archaeological Surprise: Grave Site Full of Phallic Figurines

phallusArchaeologists excavating a burial site near Nazareth dating back to between 6750 and 8500 B.C. found the area littered with shells, axes, and other artifacts—no surprise there. But something else also caught their attention: a high number of phallic figurines.

It’s not unusual to find reproductive-themed artifacts in grave sites from this period, says study leader Nigel Goring-Morris of the Hebrew University. But this period of history, not so long after the agricultural revolution, typically produced more female figurines, associated with the fertility of the land. Even though most of the 65 people buried in this 10 meters by 20 meters plot were young men, he says, the finding is an odd one.

Goring-Morris speculates that these guys were trying to reclaim their manhood. With societies at the time moving from being hunter-gatherers to farmers, he says, men lost some of the macho feeling: Let’s face it, plowing a field just doesn’t get the testosterone flowing as much as killing a gazelle. There’s no real evidence that these men felt that way, but the possible alternative explanations for carving a bunch of phalluses are perhaps more unsavory.

In any case, farming—and female fertility imagery—won out in the region. But every time a group of men jump in a freezing lake or embark on a disastrous camping trip to reassert their manhood, they can rest assured that they might just be carrying on a millennia-old tradition.

Image: Nigel Goring-Morris

Share

September 8th, 2008 3:24 PM Tags: archaeology
by Andrew Moseman in The World According to Darwin | 7 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • tresmal

    “Archaeologists excavating a burial site near Nazareth dating back to between 6750 and 8500 B.C.”

    Doesn’t that make them older than the Earth? (snark, snark, snark)

  • http://wizodd.com Charles M. Barnard

    What “alternative explanations” are “unsavory?”

    Perhaps they were carving dildos…?

  • Chris Wood

    I find it insufferably Puritan that archaeologists consistently ignore one of the most sensible explanations for phallic figures – at least the larger ones – is that they were sex toys. Has anyone ever tested the surfaces of some of these “figurines” to check for bodily fluids?

  • Joan Griffith

    As a matter of fact, such objects were used in “holy” rites in which a barren wife would be ritually inseminated by the god. It makes sense that the object would then be discarded so that worshippers would get their money’s worth.

    By the way, can we relate this at all to the round stones with a hole in Britain (Scotland? Ireland? England? ) that women would crawl thru in order to get pregnant? AND, there is today an African statue made of dark wood which if one only touches it, causes women to get pregnant, or so they claim… the mythology of seeking God’s help to have a child is very old. Oops, I forgot, Nicole Kidman & friends swim in the pool down under where about 6 of them became pregnant, including Nic. So she said.

    I seriously doubt that DNA would remain after all this time.

    Rocks as sex toys? Rocks?? Leave it to a man to think of that.

  • http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2009/06/05/toil-and-trouble-scientists-analyze-17th-century-witches-brew/ Toil and Trouble: Scientists Analyze 17th Century “Witches Brew” | Discoblog | Discover Magazine

    [...] Archaeological Surprise: Grave Site Full of Phallic Figurines Discoblog: Caribbean Bowls Reveal Ancient…Drug Habit? Image: flickr / [...]

  • http://www.oversigt.com/ hottie

    ASAP

  • http://hitogether.com Eric

    Comments like “but the possible alternative explanations for carving a bunch of phalluses are perhaps more unsavory.” are the kinds of journalism that put discovermagazine firmly in the “popular” realm and clearly separate it from academic sources. Science is not savory or unsavory, it just is.

    There is a possible social / sexual comment therein. I suspect if there were vaginas, tits and ass it wouldn’t be so “unsavory”. Why is the penis and what people might do with one, or even something shaped like one so “unsavory”?





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us