<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worst Science Article of the Week: We Can See Your Dreams!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/12/16/worst-science-article-of-the-week-we-can-see-your-dreams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/12/16/worst-science-article-of-the-week-we-can-see-your-dreams/</link>
	<description>Quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:03:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Can a Dead Fish Prove that Modern Brain Studies Are Bunk? &#124; Discoblog &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/12/16/worst-science-article-of-the-week-we-can-see-your-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-26106</link>
		<dc:creator>Can a Dead Fish Prove that Modern Brain Studies Are Bunk? &#124; Discoblog &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/12/16/worst-science-article-of-the-week-we-can-see-your-dreams/#comment-26106</guid>
		<description>[...] in the know) and it seems to be everywhere these days. Scientists are using it for everything from looking at your dreams to studying the brains of jazz musicians to IDing the part of the brain that is activated when we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the know) and it seems to be everywhere these days. Scientists are using it for everything from looking at your dreams to studying the brains of jazz musicians to IDing the part of the brain that is activated when we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/12/16/worst-science-article-of-the-week-we-can-see-your-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-22872</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/12/16/worst-science-article-of-the-week-we-can-see-your-dreams/#comment-22872</guid>
		<description>REd...are you retarded? an fMRI, if not a machine, is a what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REd&#8230;are you retarded? an fMRI, if not a machine, is a what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/12/16/worst-science-article-of-the-week-we-can-see-your-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-20535</link>
		<dc:creator>red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/12/16/worst-science-article-of-the-week-we-can-see-your-dreams/#comment-20535</guid>
		<description>Next will be mind reading computers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next will be mind reading computers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/12/16/worst-science-article-of-the-week-we-can-see-your-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-18806</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/12/16/worst-science-article-of-the-week-we-can-see-your-dreams/#comment-18806</guid>
		<description>In the first reports I read of this, the researchers were careful to talk about dreams as very much a future possibility. However 90+% of subsequent reports casts their letter-reading work directly as dream-reading.

I&#039;m going with consistently bad, sensationalist &lt;i&gt;reporting&lt;/i&gt; as the problem here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first reports I read of this, the researchers were careful to talk about dreams as very much a future possibility. However 90+% of subsequent reports casts their letter-reading work directly as dream-reading.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going with consistently bad, sensationalist <i>reporting</i> as the problem here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
