DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« “Magic” Software Can Predict What CD You’ll Be Buying
Need that Cancer-Fighting Plant? It May Soon Be Extinct. »

Is Googling Bad For the Environment?

googleIs “Don’t Be Evil” Google in fact a sinister pollution-spewing machine? A Sunday Times article cited new research by Harvard physicist Alex Wissner-Gross, claiming that every Google search emits 7 grams of CO2, about half the amount released from boiling a kettle of water (15 grams). It portrays Google as “secretive about its energy consumption and carbon footprint” and refusing to “divulge” the locations of its power-sucking data centers.

There’s more:

When you type in a Google search for, say, “energy saving tips”, your request doesn’t go to just one server. It goes to several competing against each other.

It may even be sent to servers thousands of miles apart. Google’s infrastructure sends you data from whichever produces the answer fastest. The system minimises delays but raises energy consumption. Google has servers in the US, Europe, Japan and China.

The article also implicates other online activities, like Twittering or maintaining an avatar in Second Life (by one estimate, that avatar uses almost as much electricity as the average citizen of Brazil).

Google promptly put out a response on their blog challenging Wissner-Gross’ claims and touting the company’s green credentials. Each search emits a mere 0.2 grams of CO2, says Google.  Besides, isn’t online searching greener than driving to the library?

Jason Kincaid of TechCrunch agrees and offers some perspective:

A single book runs around 2,500 grams of CO2, or more than 350 times a Google search. By some estimates, a single cheeseburger has a carbon footprint of around 3,600 grams—over 500 times larger than a Google search.

Kincaid also points out a potential conflict of interest: Turns out, Wissner-Gross is co-founder of CO2Stats.com (which the Times mentions in passing), a for-profit company that calculates and purchases “energy certificates” for energy-conscious websites (which the Times neglects to mention).

Related Content:
Discoblog: Artist Pollutes to Criticize Carbon Offsets
DISCOVER: Carbon Trading: Environmental Godsend or Giant Shell Game?
DISCOVER: Counting Carbons

Image: flickr / Mykl Roventine

Share

January 12th, 2009 8:09 PM Tags: carbon dioxide, global warming, google, pollution
by Nina Bai in Pollution Solutions (& Disasters), Technology Attacks! | 9 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ Uncle Al

    Google runs 200 million searches/day for a claimed contingent 511,000 tonnes of CO2/year. Anthropogenic CO2 emissions sum to 28 billion metric tonnes/year. Google devastates Earth with a 0.0018% increment, worst case. (Does hydroelectric power emit 7 g CO2/search? “Project 02″) We demand the Google Algaeic Fuel Fix (GAFF).

    http://www.eia.doe.gov/bookshelf/brochures/greenhouse/images/fig1.png
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_platform#Project_02
    http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal//flat.htm
    The Carbon Tax on Everything, philosophized.

  • http://scienceweblog.org scienceweblog

    haha,It is interesting!

  • http://fehlmann.net/ jf

    Wissner-Gross, says he never mentions Google in the study:
    http://www.technewsworld.com/rsstory/65794.html

  • http://www.carbonfund.org Jen Hawse

    An alternative to google, http://www.blackle.com This color swapped black on white text google powered search engine uses less power on your computers side of things, even if it pulls from the same few thousand servers.

  • Elizabeth, V.

    It is true that the google searches start to add up but what can we really do about it?? People rely on google troughtout the world.

  • http://www.sciencetastic.net scienceTASTIC

    “Besides, isn’t online searching greener than driving to the library?” True, but if there was no internet I would never drive to the library to find out the name of that rollerblading movie in the 90′s with Seth Green and Jack Black. (So you can sleep tonight… it’s Airborne.)

  • http://fatscience.wordpress.com Miriam Gordon

    Thank you for this article, its very interesting. I’m glad to see the scientific community being continually conscious about their CO2 footprints – it’s important to keep reminding ourselves, it’s the only way we as a global community will change our energy consumption ways.

    I’m not completely sure that any mega-corporation can completely circumvent evil…

    I really love the image at the header of this post and would like to use it. Would it be possible to get back to me and let me know what the copyright status is? Thanks very much.

  • Luke

    Ugh. Shut up you stupid hippies. You hurt progress, you lie, you distort. SHUT UP.

    Just for this, I’m googling “environment sucks” 100 times.

  • http://okwildkatzs.com Kory Sandell

    Of course, what a splendid website and illuminating posts, I surely will bookmark your website.All the Best!





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us