DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« Scientists Build Fake Burping Cows to Study Methane Emissions
Enough of This S#%t! Dung Beetles Morph into Millipede-Eaters »

Could the Hero of “Lie to Me” Really Sniff Out Any Lie?

lie to me stillLie detection is all the rage on TV these days, with newcomer “The Mentalist” drawing viewers like flies to honey and “The Closer” and “Psych” burning up the Nielsens. And now a new show has joined the mix, called “Lie to Me,” about a man with a near-preternatural ability to tell when someone is lying.

The show stars Tim Roth (forever Mr. Orange) as Dr. Cal Lightman, a behavioral science expert who makes bank as a consultant for clients who want him to catch liars. His near-perfect skills supposedly come from interpretation of body language and facial expressions that let him in on whether this week’s murder suspect or shifty spouse is spinning a big one.

Both the main character and his skills are reportedly based on the persona and work of Dr. Paul Ekman, the facial expression expert who advises the Department of Defense on lie detection. Ekman’s method is based on what he calls “microexpressions,” small facial movements that he says present evidence of what you’re really feeling. We don’t necessarily know we’re doing them, so we can’t necessarily control them—say “I am saddened by my wife’s death” but flash a happy or disgusted microexpression, and a detective should take note.

As DISCOVER reported in 2005, Ekman’s colleague Maureen O’Sullivan found that a tiny group of people can become nearly 100 percent accurate at lie-catching. These mendacity savant, known as “wizards,” can not only recognize every microexpression, but can also read the “whole picture” of the situation—a necessary task, since not every liar shows anything on their faces, meaning that microexpressions aren’t a perfect method. Granted, exceptions and nuance don’t make for the best network TV, so Lightman romps through each episode pointing out blatant facial cues that not even a blind cockatiel could miss.

It’s true that, when it comes to lie-detection science, reading behavioral cues is still the best technique we have. Still, it’s hardly an exact science. But then, what’s a network TV series that doesn’t bend the truth a little?

Related:
DISCOVER: The Physiology of . . . Facial Expressions
DISCOVER: The Science of Sniffing Out Liars

Image: Courtesy of FOX

Share

January 21st, 2009 1:25 PM Tags: lying, psychology, TV
by Melissa Lafsky in Crime & Punishment | 3 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • j

    It also depends on the liar’s subjective belief of whether or not they are lying. Many sociopaths are good at masking lies and have almost no physiological or behavioral response when they lie. It is now widely established that polygraphs are grossly inaccurate and mostly inadmissible in court. Although the reading of microexpressions may be more accurate, if it’s impossible to demonstrate or reproduce in court it’s not a viable piece of evidence. I imagine on the show they are using his abilities to get suspects to confess, which is really the only way this “technique” can be used effectively.

    Don’t even get me started on the fact that most crime shows end the story at a confession. I respect Law and Order more than other shows because it addresses many issues that come up in trial proceedings (some incorrectly, albeit). Shows like CSI and presumably Lie to Me end the story at the solution of the crime, leading the viewer to assume that the perp is convicted and gets what he or she deserves.

  • http://artofscience.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/tv-science-lying/ TV Science: Lying « The Art of Science

    [...] excerpts from the Discover Magazine Discoblog (all other links in the excerpts go to other Discover Magazine [...]

  • http://nemski.com/blog/2009/01/a-tv-show-filled-with-lies/ a tv show filled with lies › nemski

    [...] Lie To Me, — I guess it is Fox — is actually based on a real person, Dr. Paul Eckman writes Melissa Lafsky on Discoblogs at Discover Magazine. Both the main character and his skills are reportedly based on the persona and work of Dr. Paul [...]





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us