DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« NCBI ROFL: Sexy ladies sexing ladies
Want Your Crocodile Removed? Strap a Magnet to Its Head »

Do Mathematicians Eat the World’s Tastiest Breakfasts?


pancake.jpgUPDATED (see below).

Thank goodness we have mathematics to solve the world’s most pressing dilemmas, such as “What’s the speed of light?” and “How do I make the world’s tastiest pancakes?” Dr. Ruth Fairclough, a mathematics professor at Wolverhampton University, set out to solve the latter problem, and has now unveiled her formula for the perfect pancake—coincidentally, just in time for International Pancake Day.

So what’s the secret to the choicest possible breakfast? With L representing the number of lumps in the batter, C the consistency, T the temperature, and a host of other variables, she calculated that perfect pancakes need only follow this simple equation:

100 – [10L - 7F + C(k - C) + T(m - T)]/(S – E).

The closer to 100 the result is, the better the pancake. The temperature of the pan (m), the consistency (C), and how long the batter sits (S) before cooking—to allow for absorption of the milk by the flour—are among the most crucial factors in making successful pancakes. The size of the pan is also important—too big and the pancakes will be hard to flip, of course.

Dr. Fairclough said she began the pancake challenge because of her two daughters’ love for the tasty breakfast treat. Lucky—and well-fed—kids!

UPDATE: A few mathematicians around the blogosphere have taken issue with the formula, calling it “unusable” and “ridiculous.” So is it bogus? Here’s a breakdown from SciencePunk:

[N]otice that although the formula uses “ideal temperature” and “ideal consistency,” there’s no clue as to what those values might be. This is kind of like saying:

Perfect pancake = ideal ingredients * ideal cooking * ideal toppings

That is to say, a total truism.

Related Content:
Disco: Is There Such a Thing as Dyslexia for Math?
Bad Astronomy: I’ll have the Silver Dollar pancakes and a probe to go, please
Bad Astronomy: Holy crepe!

Image: Flickr / mind on fire

Share

February 26th, 2009 2:09 PM Tags: algebra, breakfast, food
by Rachel Cernansky in Food, Nutrition, & More Food | 15 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • http://algebra.freehomeworkmathhelp.com Linear Equations

    When getting stuck on homework problems in math courses such as algebra, there are
    many websites online that can help. They can help with such topics as linear equations and factoring.
    Many financial courses require an excellent knowledge of algebra.

  • Sonali Noolkar

    Amazing and very interesting!
    But i wonder,how can we measure the lumps in batter and consistency?

  • http://www.mindonfire.com/2009/02/26/pictures-of-the-week/ Pictures of the Week. | Mind on Fire

    [...] Discover Magazine’s blog picked up a picture of GameBoy contemplating a good breakfast to illustrate a post (free, with attribution: this, my friends, is how Creative Commons is intended to be [...]

  • http://graspthemettle.blogspot.com/ paul coombes

    This article demeans mathematics because it is rubbish. The formula does not make sense and it encourages people who do not understand to think that mathematics is incomprehensible. For a better analysis see http://eucalculia.blogspot.com/2009/02/perfect-pancake.html.

  • Bill Miller

    Great article. As to measuring the lumps in the batter. If you apply a greater centrifigul force, over lengthy period of time, you will eliminate the need to perform lump measurement.

  • TerriLyn

    @Bill Miller: According to Alton Brown of FoodTv’s Good Eats program… Pancake batter should retain some lumps. In fact, he is of the opinion that blending the batter beyond 15-20 strokes is superfluous.

    This is something we have tested in our house, and we have found, that indeed, the pancakes do have more character and less “rubberyness” to them via this methodology.

    For more information: http://www.foodnetwork.com/good-eats/flap-jack-do-it-again/index.html

  • http://none@internet.com Mike Cederholm

    Are there no mathmaticians out there? Since when can an equation exist without and equals sign (=). The very definition of an equation, if not the name itself implies, no mandates, there must be an equals sign. To state in words that the ‘the closer to 100′ this so called equation is, the better the pancakes are says this is an inequality and not an equation!… Not to be overly critical, but I have always believed that mathmatics was one of the purest and most exact sciences. For this author of this so called equation to call herself a mathmatician is IMHO a degradation of anyone that truly is on. Therefore I say the artical is total bogus!

  • konakoffee

    I would reconsider any formula where, if you refer to the picture, the pancake looks more like a well-risen pizza with breakfast toppings…
    If you want a good pancake, buy a mix. The chemists/mathematicians have already done the hard work for you.

  • morbidwax

    Madness!
    I think Mrs Waltons’ Pancake Paradise would disagree completely. This equation does not even consider the ‘Love’ factor. Einstein would agree, things taste alot better when made with love? :)

  • Hahaha

    How can you have a formula for tastiers thing if people have different tastes? i think the formular would probably taste like crap

  • A

    Rubbish

  • Paps

    Isn’t it enough that the universe is already governed by mathematics?! We have to do that for cooking too!? jeez… what happened to cooking with tlc?

  • Duncan Campbell

    What do you expect from Wolverhampton? After all, when it was still a Polytechnic it was under threat of having its degree status withdrawn by the CNAA.

  • Mike

    Reporters fall for the stupidest things because they don’t understand math and science. Not only is this not an equation, it’s a meaningless expression.

  • http://www.mathtrench.com Math Help

    I definitely agree with posts #7 and #14…..(I’m a mathematician by the way)





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us