DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« Cell Phone Kisses: New Phone Will Send Your Smooch Through the Airwaves
Twitter Surpasses Continental Drift in Congressional Awareness »

Scrawny? Buff? You May Hear Sounds Differently

skinny.jpgPeople may perceive sound differently, depending on how in shape they are. Researchers have previously shown that women respond to oncoming noise sooner than men, supporting the view that stronger people require less time to react to impending danger. In the latest study from Ohio, scientists say that response time is not based on someone’s gender, height, or weight, but instead, relies on how fit a person is.

“This is the first evidence that our motor system and the perception of looming sounds evolved together,” John Neuhoff, an evolutionary psychologist at the College of Wooster and lead researcher on the study, told DISCOVER. Neuhoff tested 50 people, ranging from college students to 43-year-old couch potatoes, for strength and cardiovascular fitness. He categorized his subjects based on their fitness level, measuring their pulse rate for 60 seconds after they marched for three minutes.

The subjects were then put into an isolated room and asked to push a button when they thought a sound was in front of them. The tests sounds were emitted from 300 feet away and approached the participants at 50 feet per second—so they took about 6 seconds to reach the subjects’ ears. (Emitted at 400 hertz, the noises sounded like the middle tone of a piano rather than a fire alarm).

Almost everyone in the study pushed the button before they should have, but the people who performed poorly on the fitness test pressed the button tens of milliseconds sooner than the ones who performed well.

The not-so-fit people responded more quickly to approaching sounds because they would need more time to flee an approaching predator, Neuhoff hypothesized. But the theory leaves plenty of holes: What about people who are predisposed to physical weakness but become very physically fit? Does their hearing change along with their benchpress numbers?

Related Content:
DISCOVER: Vital Signs
DISCOVER: Noise and Senses

Image: flickr/ Bobshaw Pete

Share

April 27th, 2009 6:24 PM Tags: evolution, fitness, noise
by Boonsri Dickinson in What’s Inside Your Brain?, Where We Came From & Where We're Going | 8 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • scott

    um, was this room filled with something other than air? ’cause last i checked, the normal speed of sound in air was about 340 m/s…

    (also, mixing feet and meters, in the same sentence no less… kinda weird…)

  • http://jonofscience.wordpress.com JonP

    I’m pretty sure the source of the sound (virtual, I’m assuming) was moving towards them at 50 ft/s rather than the actual waves themselves. Simply emitting a sound from a stationary source 300 ft away wouldn’t have accomplished much.

  • http://www.swmm2000.com red

    In the original article the sound was moving 50 ft/s towards the participants

    “In the study, participants were made to listen to a tone moving toward them and they had to press a button when they thought the sound had arrived directly in front of them.”

    It was a moving sound source.

  • http://www.threeaunties.org/ Maria Minno

    Very cool.

    Here’s an idea: People who are unhealthy often have depleted adrenal glands. This causes hyper vigilance, which results in hitting the button sooner.

  • Paul

    Typical neo-Darwinian BS. I hypothesize Neuhoff designed this study to achieve the results he “discovered”, thus hoping to secure a grant from some like-minded organization. The most LIKELY conclusion from the results is that the human body/mind is DESIGNED to be more efficient when it is properly nourished and maintained — all systems work better when you’re healthy. DUH.

  • Shane M

    “tens of milliseconds?”

    is this significant enough time to even draw a conclusion?

  • http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2009/05/29/seeing-sounds-and-hearing-food-the-science-of-synesthesia/ “Seeing” Sounds and “Hearing” Food: The Science of Synesthesia | Discoblog | Discover Magazine

    [...] Content: Discoblog: Scrawny and Buff People Hear Things Differently DISCOVER: Are We All [...]

  • Cheslea

    I would have guessed otherwise before I read this article. You would think that people that are more physically fit would have a faster reaction time. But, it makes sense.





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us