DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« How to Find Aliens? Look for Pollution on Other Planets
Dolphins “Play Ball” With Jellyfish (As in, Jellyfish Is the Ball) »

NCBI ROFL: Blue is for losers.

Better to be red than blue in virtual competition.

“In the 2004 Olympic Games, opponents wearing red athletic uniforms were more likely to win against opponents wearing blue uniforms. To investigate whether this color bias extends to the world of virtual competition, we compared the performance of red and blue teams in a popular multiplayer first-person-shooter (FPS) computer game. For 3 consecutive months, we collected data from a publicly available global statistics server. Outcomes from 1,347 matches played by the top 10 players on the same virtual arena were included. Red teams won 54.9% of matches, and this effect was highly significant. Our data suggest that joining the red team may offer a slight advantage over the blue team in virtual competition, and this should be accounted for when designing FPS games. It is likely that “seeing red” may trigger a powerful psychological distractor signal in human aggressive competition that can affect the outcome of sports and virtual contests alike.”

Thanks to Anders for today’s ROFL!

Share

October 19th, 2009 3:00 PM by ncbi rofl in NCBI ROFL, rated G | 4 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • Anonymous

    Which FPS is studied? I can't find the full text of the article, so I can't tell if they controlled for map and role symmetry or not (for instance, in TF2, the defender is Red, and the attacker is Blue).

  • Mer

    From the M&M:
    "From the popular FPS games, we selected Unreal Tournament 2004 (UT2004), developed by Epic Games, Inc. (Raleigh, N.C.), and published by Atari, Inc. (New York, N.Y.). We found UT2004 particu- larly suitable for our study because each virtual “gladiator” (controlled by the player) can be cus- tomized with red or blue team colors and because it offers a publicly available anonymous statistics site (http://ut2004stats.epicgames.com). We fo- cused our attention on the simplest and oldest game type: “Team Deathmatch” in which the team that kills the most enemy players is judged the winner."

  • Julia

    It's worth noting that the all-time results of the Cal vs. Stanford football games perfectly reflect these results.

  • MNiceLady

    Does that mean Dems are losers?





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us