Comments on: NCBI ROFL: That’s one miraculous conception.

By: wut

wut — Fri, 25 May 2012 03:12:00 +0000

Wikipedia “vagina” and notice that it is an entirely different orifice. How is a grown man not aware of this?

By: JJAB91

JJAB91 — Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:33:00 +0000

No vfgbh you fuck off.

By: vfgbh

vfgbh — Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:22:00 +0000

fuck off

By: Alexealuton

Alexealuton — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 04:49:00 +0000

See, I understand that women pee through the urethra, but it still comes OUT through the vaginal OPENING. So Phil and I are still wondering how they can pee if there is no opening for it to come out of. :/ You being douches and simply saying “you don’t pee through the vagina” does NOT answer the question OR make you smarter than anyone else. It seems you still can’t explain it, or else you probably would. Also I did try to Google how it would work but to no avail.

By: Fuckyou

Fuckyou — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 04:10:00 +0000

fuck you mate

By: /b/ro

/b/ro — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 04:09:00 +0000

tl;dr

By: Jeezychreezy

Jeezychreezy — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 04:01:00 +0000

shut up Ian. God, you’re such a pretentious little douchbag.

By: krumette

krumette — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:40:00 +0000

Mind = blown.

By: Gaurav

Gaurav — Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:19:00 +0000

I just found an astonishingly similar anecdote from 1874: http://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Attention_Gynaecologists!_%E2%80%94_Notes_from_the_Diary_of_a_Field_and_Hospital_Surgeon,_C._S._A.&oldid=1388279

By: Skizzlet

Skizzlet — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 09:12:00 +0000

I feel so much smarter having read the article you posted simply because the author of said article CITED REFERENCES!!! wooooow! This seems somewhat of an ancient sport anymore, proving the legitimacy of where you gained your information….hmmm

Anyone who reads anything and proselytizes their life in anyway due to what was read, without checking the validity of the material, is moronic.

By: Jess

Jess — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:44:03 +0000

BUT.. No, that’s not real, if she has inner womanly parts capable of having a child, then her… once a month present… would still happen, the lack of … a certain fundamental pant area … would result in a build up of blood giving her a condition similar to endometriosis, where her insides would fill up with blood and she’d die. BANG AND THE THEORY’S GONE.

So. Despite being seventeen with a distinct lack of medical knowledge, haven’t i just completely proved this to be bull—- ? Feel free to enlighten me.

By: Clyde

Clyde — Sat, 27 Aug 2011 16:37:25 +0000

Sounds to me that this person could be a candidate for a sump pump!

By: bet

bet — Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:10:16 +0000

come up from the 1st couple of pages in the research motor. Numerous this kind of Search engine marketing Providers are present in the net from we could

By: Andrew

Andrew — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:10:09 +0000

Lol just a pic guys chill. And before ya flame me, I luvd all the comments. So entertaining lol. Start the flame wars!

By: Ned Montecillo

Ned Montecillo — Tue, 31 May 2011 18:43:19 +0000

Beverly Hills city plastic surgeons

By: Dora the Explorer Games

Dora the Explorer Games — Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:23:13 +0000

That’s exciting news! What a nice way for learning

By: elizabeth

elizabeth — Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:09:11 +0000

Good point Otto… I was thinking the same thing..

By: Otto Brekner

Otto Brekner — Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:49:38 +0000

I know it is late comment, and it was said before, but the icon has nothing to do with the article. Suggesting some connections with religion without actually mentioning them cast a shadow of doubt over the professionalism of the author.

By: Jockaira

Jockaira — Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:56:53 +0000

@113 John

It looks like Discover has become a suburb of Rotten.com

By: cgauthier

cgauthier — Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:22:39 +0000

BP said:

Did she give birth to the son of god? who knows? Depends what you believe. Why worry about the details when it’s the end message that matters?

What, the end message that the fictional, torturous murder and zombification of a fictionalized, heretic rabbi 2000yrs ago somehow exonerates those who symbolically cannibalize him? If so, yeah, ok, that’s pretty important…

I’m surprised no brain-dead zombie eaters, frothing with fatwa envy, have challenged the blogger to post a “picture” of Muhammad yet.

Some others here have it right: If you, as a Xian (of any stripe), feel that a painting of a character, especially an ancillary one, in your fable is sacred, you are in direct violation of your second most important commandment.

p.s. I know that many Xians have a much more “sophisticated” theology than this, but it is always so very telling that they get so defensive when someone criticizes the crazies that give them a bad name.

By: staringintospace

staringintospace — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 04:13:55 +0000

Copying and pasting this story was the best idea on the internet. I have never enjoyed comments to a story better than this. But now I’m sad. I bet someone is going to tell me there is no Easter Bunny, no Santa Claus and that Elvis is really dead. I can believe a good story like immaculate conception — but a 15 year old working in a bar? That’s beyond the pale.

By: tps

tps — Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:16:44 +0000

Replace it with an image on toast. That’s much less offensive, right?

Excellent find. There must be events in human physiology and medicine that happen with extremely low frequency, like this case of oral fertilization assisted by violence, but happen often enough (once) to appear in the medical literature. I’m wondering what we’ll see next.

By: solartronenergy

solartronenergy — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 08:17:21 +0000

The story sounds like urban lore to me, however the comments were entertaining

By: solartronenergy

solartronenergy — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 08:15:54 +0000

Another excellent reason to avoid violence; you just might get somebody pregnant.

By: Free Dora Explorer Games

Free Dora Explorer Games — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:54:02 +0000

Funny, my dad always said that you can’t get a girls mouth pregnant. Guess he was way wrong.

By: luis

luis — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:34:32 +0000

Holy cow!

By: Interesting!

Interesting! — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:03:10 +0000

I feel almost bad for being the 151st comment, was such a round number at 150, paha. This has been actually really interesting? And true, ‘Mary’ probably was black, so the point about not worshipping false gods is really valid.
@fastjack , that’s hilarious!
@Otis Driftwood , WTF?
@Discordian , STFU.
@jendywo , you have far too much spare time.

By: Doctrine of Immaculate Conception

Doctrine of Immaculate Conception — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:11:14 +0000

I just thought I’d add a side not here to agree with J.L. It is nice to see that they didn’t refer to it as an immaculate conception. Although I am not Catholic I am aware that there exists a Doctrine of Immaculate Conception that clearly ideintifies Mary as the Immaculate Conception (being born free of sin and thus stopping her from passing it to jesus, [perhaps so we also accept that she conceived Jesus without having had sex?]) So good choice of words there. As to not posting images of Religious Figures…seriously lost the point of the article there…it’s focus isn’t on the image, it’s on the fact that this happened (whether you think it a hoax or not is regardless) and the choice of image was just a use of linkage for those that still believe that Jesus was “miraculously conceived”. Seriously mind boggling story though. As to Phil’s Post seriously leave the guy alone it’s not uncalled for to be unfamiliar with the workings of the female uretha (unless one’s a little twisted and enjoys the art of urinating women…) and at least he posed the question rather than saying “you can’t urinate without a vagina”. Suppose he at least knows now.

By: Alex

Alex — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:17:26 +0000

Oh and phil, I’m 12, and I know what the difference between a vagina and a urethra is…. Dumbass

By: Alex

Alex — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:08:51 +0000

I’m just kind of wondering, why don’t they do a DNA test on the “Supposed” father?