DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« NASA iPhone App Lets You Drive a Lunar Rover (Just Try Not to Get Stuck)
NCBI ROFL: Binge drinking in Jewish and non-Jewish white college students. »

And the Survey Says: Google Is Not Making You Stupid

is_google_making_us_stupidIn 2008, writer Nicholas Carr worried in The Atlantic that the search engine Google and the easy availability of information on the internet is making our brains lazy–and rendering humans stupid. He wrote that the net was destroying his capacity for concentration and contemplation, adding, “Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski.”

DISCOVER’s own Carl Zimmer responded by taking the opposite stance, and declaring that Google is making us smarter. He argued that humans are “natural born cyborgs” and the internet is our “giant extended mind.” He wrote that there was “nothing unnatural about relying on the internet—Google and all—for information…. Nor is there anything bad about our brains’ being altered by these new technologies, any more than there is something bad about a monkey’s brain changing as it learns how to play with a rake.”

Now, a new survey from the Pew Internet & American Life Project agrees with Zimmer; it found that Google is indeed making us smarter by allowing us to make better choices. More than 76 percent of the 895 experts polled said Nicholas Carr was wrong in thinking that Google made us stupid.

PC Magazine reports:

“Google allows us to be more creative in approaching problems and more integrative in our thinking. We spend less time trying to recall and more time generating solutions,” said Paul Jones of ibiblio.org at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.

“For people who are readers and who are willing to explore new sources and new arguments, we can only be made better by the kinds of searches we will be able to do,” wrote Oscar Gandy, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania. “Of course, the kind of Googled future that I am concerned about is the one in which my every desire is anticipated, and my every fear avoided by my guardian Google. Even then, I might not be stupid, just not terribly interesting.”

Nicholas Carr meanwhile said he “felt compelled to agree with himself,” telling the Pew Project:

“What the Net does is shift the emphasis of our intelligence, away from what might be called a meditative or contemplative intelligence and more toward what might be called a utilitarian intelligence. The price of zipping among lots of bits of information is a loss of depth in our thinking.”

Peter Norvig, Google’s research director, argued in turn that because Google makes so much information available instantly, it’s a good strategy for a knowledge-seeker to skim through many offerings first to get an overview. Then the user can settle down with the best sources for a deeper read. He added that skimming and concentrating can and should coexist.

Related Content:
DISCOVER: How Google Is Making Us Smarter
DISCOVER: Big Picture: 5 Reasons Science [Hearts] Google
DISCOVER: Google Taught Me How to Cut My Own Hair

Image: The Atlantic

Share

February 22nd, 2010 2:30 PM Tags: google, intelligence
by Smriti Rao in Technology Attacks! | 4 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • http://www.a2q.com Jay Warner

    There is a type of thinking that prefers to ‘skim along the surface’ of information, then select a conclusion. If they do a reasonable analysis, or if we agree with the conclusion, we call this a good thing. I find that Google gives me that vastly greater access to information, but I have trouble winnowing down even what it offers, because I tend to go very deeply into details.

    The issue is not, IMHO, in whether Google stupefies us, but in how well we perform the analysis and synthesis. Google does nothing for that.

  • MSD

    How many “thinkers” used to spend hour upon hour at the library doing research? How is that much different than using Google, or any other online resource? There may be more risk of finding information that is incorrect or that may not be verified, but there is usually more of it and it’s available in an instant. And it still takes an intelligent person to wade through it all to find the relevant and accurate facts which may help them form an astute opinion.

    I completely agree that while the internet has changed the method by which we apply our intelligence, the tool itself has not robbed us of it.

    Now, reality TV on the other hand…

  • Ceci

    I think Carr is antiquated. Sure, deep thinking is important, but it can happen with or without google. Again, tools only depend on the people who use them. The worst part is that he can’t accept when he’s wrong.

  • Dash

    I have to agree with you, MSD, but there is the worry that the internet is making us stupid in that it becomes harder to develop ones own opinion about facts. This isn’t much more different then, say, a 1st grade teacher representing our government as flawless not so much by saying it but with little signals that we subconsciously pick up on. But this type of tampered information trading is unfortunately common in education and so I don’t think the internet can be held responsible. In fact, one might be able to argue all the heavily opinionated pieces help remind thinkers to do their own work.





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us