DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« Why Can’t All Medications Come in Ice Cream-Form?
My Name Is Topeka, Kansas, but You Can Call Me Google »

NCBI ROFL: Geese: the pack animals of the future.

2387239278_356283932e-1Load carrying during locomotion in the barnacle goose (Branta leucopsis): The effect of load placement and size.

“Load carrying has been used to study the energetics and mechanics of locomotion in a range of taxa. Here we investigated the energetic and kinematic effects of trunk and limb loading in walking barnacle geese (Branta leucopsis). A directly proportional relationship between increasing back load mass and metabolic rate was established, indicating that the barnacle goose can carry back loads (up to 20% of body mass) more economically than the majority of mammals… Sternal loads up to 15% of body mass were approximately twice as expensive to carry as back loads… Loading the distal limb with 5% extra mass incurred the greatest proportional rise in metabolism, and also caused increases in stride length, swing duration and stride frequency during locomotion. The increased work required to move the loaded limb may explain the high cost of walking.”

goose_load

Photo: flickr/Daveness_98

Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: How hard can I snuggle my penguin without waking him?
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: fun with animals

Share

March 3rd, 2010 7:00 PM by ncbi rofl in fun with animals, NCBI ROFL | 2 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • Mokele

    How is this “ROFL”-worthy? It takes about 2 brain cells to see that potential ecological relevance of this in several possible ways (cost of eggs beyond simple calories in them, cost of accumulating fat stores for migration, cost of bigger pectoral muscles).

    You want something to mock, look up anything published by Alan Feduccia

  • TheBrummell

    When they say “more economically than the majority of mammals”, what is their comparison based on? Smaller bodies can carry proportionally more of their own weight as an additional load, so are they comparing these geese to the measured load-carrying-ability of similar-sized mammals, or the much larger bodied species typically used to carry loads? As far as I know, the majority of mammals, both in species numbers and numbers of individuals, are rodents, almost all of which would be smaller than geese. Where’s the dataset of (literal) pack-rats?

    Also, I second the above sentiment that this seems a less mock-worthy study than the majority on this website.





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us