Comments on: How to Make People Believe in ESP: Tell Them Scientists Think It's Bogus

By: Don Salmon

Don Salmon — Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:53:00 +0000

A study of 1000 scientists showed that 67 percent accepted the possibility of ESP. Maybe the problem is not the public’s perception of science but bad reporting like this article?

By: Kylee_hanninen

Kylee_hanninen — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:53:00 +0000

What is the popultion affected by ESP?

By: Jello

Jello — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:07:16 +0000

I don’t beleive this fact because scientists beleive in it.

By: Charanjeet Singh Lamba (gnosiologist : astral`scientist)

Charanjeet Singh Lamba (gnosiologist : astral`scientist) — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:04:25 +0000

-
Indeed a good article to present an unknown stuff beyond Science… by dint of studying the extrasensory perception (ESP), the supposed paranormal phenomenon of mind-reading.

Laconically, lets ponder to ascertain the truth that “KNOWLEDGE IS NOT AT MERCY OF SOMEONE BELIEF OR FAITH ; IT HAS ITS OWN TIME : SPACE : LIGHT TO PRESENT ITSELF.” Unknowingly we misspell our Perception with Knowledge…

Knowledge and all of God is ONE, whilst Human is the source of both.
Faith or Belief is father of Knowledge, whilst the mother is Science.
Science is Knowledge of Known : Knowledge of Unknown is God.
Myth is Know of the Unknown : Unknown to be Known is Mystic.

In compendium, the relation between the Mind and the Objective-world (matter) is called as Para`Physics, whereas the relation between the Mind and the meta-subjective world (consciousness) is called as Omnijectivism. The combo of both is the arena of Astral Science.

Science has yet to surpass the bandages and barrages of meta-physics to see the dawn of a new physics “para-physics”, whereas the study as narrated herein above for the extrasensory perception (ESP), the supposed paranormal phenomenon of mind-reading is the herald of the same… Lets welcome with open hands.

Good Wishes & Greetings.
-

By: Aaron

Aaron — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:38:08 +0000

This is one of the unfortunate pitfalls of humanity, we tend to dismiss things offhand that we don’t understand. ESP has a very simple explanation ‘magic’. While science is difficult to understand. People tend to shy away from ideas that they don’t understand simply from fear of not understanding them.

By: Jon Klar

Jon Klar — Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:50:06 +0000

Actually “science” as we know it didn’t exist until the late 1400′s early 1500′s with people like Galileo and Francis Bacon, well after myths like these were dispelled. It’s not a matter of someone smart or important saying that something is true, science is based on repeatable direct observation. This is what makes it trustworthy, as opposed to a random idea that “seems cool” so it must be true.

By: Kadiya

Kadiya — Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:58:23 +0000

Or, it could be that people understand that what science knows today is less than it will know in a decade. It used to be that “science” told people the Earth was flat and that the heavens revolved around it. Now we know differently. Tomorrow, what new thing will science discover that will reshape our world view?