DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« Turn a Man Into Mush With a Nasal Spray of Pure Oxytocin
Army Generals Fret: Are Americans too Fat to Fight? »

NCBI ROFL: For some reason, med students don’t want to show their genitals in class.

2446536264_822f20b28cDon’t want to show fellow students my naughty bits: medical students’ anxieties about peer examination of intimate body regions at six schools across UK, Australasia and Far-East Asia.

“BACKGROUND: Although recent quantitative research suggests that medical students are reluctant to engage in peer physical examination (PPE) of intimate body regions, we do not know why. AIM: This article explores first-year medical students’ anxieties about PPE of intimate body regions at six schools. METHODS: Using the Examining Fellow Students (EFS) questionnaire, we collected qualitative data from students in five countries (UK; Australia; New Zealand; Japan; Hong Kong) between 2005 and 2007. RESULTS: Our framework analysis of 617 (78.7%) students’ qualitative comments yielded three themes: present and future benefits of PPE; possible barriers to PPE; and student stipulations for successful PPE. This article focuses on several sub-themes relating to students’ anxieties about PPE of intimate body regions and their associated sexual, gender, cultural and religious concerns. By exploring students’ euphemisms about intimate areas, our findings reveal further insights into the relationship between students’ anxieties, gender and culture. CONCLUSION: First-year students are anxious about examining intimate body regions, so a staged approach starting with manikins is recommended. Further qualitative research is needed employing interviews to explore in depth students’ anxieties about examinations of intimate body regions and how their views are shaped by interactions with peers, patients and doctors.”

med_students_naughty_bits

Image: flickr/Okko Pyykkö

Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Boys and girls, please open your textbooks to page 69…
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Girls Gone Wild: science edition!
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Education: Solved.

WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!

Share

April 30th, 2010 7:00 PM by ncbi rofl in duh, NCBI ROFL | 4 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • Sal

    Haha – reminds me of my first year in med school, when I was “volunteered”, together with 4 other boys, to produce sperm for the physiology lab so that other students could look at fresh human sperm under the microscope.

    How odd that all five “voluteers” happened to miss that lab.

  • BillWhite36

    Looks to me like the guy in the picture just got an unexpected digital prostate exam!

  • http://scienceontap.blogspot.com ARJ

    I’ll show you mine if you show me yours FIRST (…AND, it’s smaller than mine).

  • Jockaira

    Why not require all classroom attendance to be without clothing…that should take care of the bashful ones. Additionally, it might impress upon medical students the necessity of meeting all situations without pretense or concern for non-medical circumstances.

    Instructors? Wear anything they want…let the students come to appreciate the feelings of patients.





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us